Visit-specific expectations and patient-centered outcomes: a literature review.

J K Rao, M Weinberger, K Kroenke
{"title":"Visit-specific expectations and patient-centered outcomes: a literature review.","authors":"J K Rao,&nbsp;M Weinberger,&nbsp;K Kroenke","doi":"10.1001/archfami.9.10.1148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care patients often have certain expectations when visiting physicians, many of which may be undetected. These unmet expectations can affect outcomes such as satisfaction with care. We performed a formal literature review to examine the effect of fulfillment of patients' visit-specific expectations on their satisfaction as well as on health status and compliance.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Included studies were conducted in primary care settings, systematically recruited patients, elicited previsit and/or postvisit expectations relative to specific visits, and measured patient-centered outcomes. Two reviewers abstracted information on study characteristics; types, timing, and method of expectation ascertainment; and outcomes. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies were reviewed including 7 trials, 4 cohort studies, and 12 cross-sectional studies. Patients frequently expected information rather than specific physician actions, but physicians often did not accurately perceive patients' visit-specific expectations. In 19 studies that assessed postvisit patient satisfaction, a positive association between meeting patient expectations and overall satisfaction was demonstrated in 11 studies, inconclusive in 3, and not established in 5. In 2 studies assessing physician satisfaction, physicians with access to patients' expectations were more satisfied than those without access. Other outcomes (symptom or disease improvement, health status, test ordering, health care costs, psychological symptoms) were measured in only a few studies, and the results were inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Addressing patients' visit-specific expectations appears to affect satisfaction to a modest degree. Future studies should evaluate methods that efficiently elicit, prioritize, and provide patients' previsit expectations for physicians and should examine the longitudinal effect of expectation fulfillment on patient outcomes. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1148-1155</p>","PeriodicalId":8295,"journal":{"name":"Archives of family medicine","volume":"9 10","pages":"1148-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"217","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 217

Abstract

Background: Primary care patients often have certain expectations when visiting physicians, many of which may be undetected. These unmet expectations can affect outcomes such as satisfaction with care. We performed a formal literature review to examine the effect of fulfillment of patients' visit-specific expectations on their satisfaction as well as on health status and compliance.

Patients and methods: Included studies were conducted in primary care settings, systematically recruited patients, elicited previsit and/or postvisit expectations relative to specific visits, and measured patient-centered outcomes. Two reviewers abstracted information on study characteristics; types, timing, and method of expectation ascertainment; and outcomes. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

Results: Twenty-three studies were reviewed including 7 trials, 4 cohort studies, and 12 cross-sectional studies. Patients frequently expected information rather than specific physician actions, but physicians often did not accurately perceive patients' visit-specific expectations. In 19 studies that assessed postvisit patient satisfaction, a positive association between meeting patient expectations and overall satisfaction was demonstrated in 11 studies, inconclusive in 3, and not established in 5. In 2 studies assessing physician satisfaction, physicians with access to patients' expectations were more satisfied than those without access. Other outcomes (symptom or disease improvement, health status, test ordering, health care costs, psychological symptoms) were measured in only a few studies, and the results were inconclusive.

Conclusions: Addressing patients' visit-specific expectations appears to affect satisfaction to a modest degree. Future studies should evaluate methods that efficiently elicit, prioritize, and provide patients' previsit expectations for physicians and should examine the longitudinal effect of expectation fulfillment on patient outcomes. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1148-1155

特定访问期望和以患者为中心的结果:文献综述。
背景:初级保健患者在拜访医生时往往有一定的期望,其中许多可能未被发现。这些未满足的期望会影响护理满意度等结果。我们进行了一项正式的文献综述,以检查患者对其满意度以及健康状况和依从性的特定访问期望的实现的影响。患者和方法:纳入的研究在初级保健机构进行,系统地招募患者,引出与特定访问相关的访前和/或访后期望,并测量以患者为中心的结果。两位审稿人对研究特征的信息进行了摘要;期望确定的类型、时间和方法;和结果。分歧通过协商一致得到解决。结果:共回顾了23项研究,包括7项试验、4项队列研究和12项横断面研究。患者通常期待的是信息而不是医生的具体行动,但医生往往不能准确地感知患者对就诊的具体期望。在19项评估患者术后满意度的研究中,11项研究证明满足患者期望与总体满意度之间存在正相关,3项研究不确定,5项研究未确定。在两项评估医生满意度的研究中,能够达到患者期望的医生比无法达到患者期望的医生更满意。其他结果(症状或疾病改善、健康状况、检查顺序、医疗保健费用、心理症状)仅在少数研究中进行了测量,结果尚无定论。结论:解决患者特定的访问期望似乎在一定程度上影响满意度。未来的研究应评估有效地引出、优先考虑和提供患者对医生的就诊前期望的方法,并应检查期望实现对患者结果的纵向影响。中华医学杂志。2000;9:1148-1155
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信