Assessment of nutritional status in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: a comparison of bioelectric impedance and conventional methods.

C H Cheng, M Y Chen, Y J Lee, M C Lee, K H Shu, M Y Wu, J D Lian
{"title":"Assessment of nutritional status in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: a comparison of bioelectric impedance and conventional methods.","authors":"C H Cheng,&nbsp;M Y Chen,&nbsp;Y J Lee,&nbsp;M C Lee,&nbsp;K H Shu,&nbsp;M Y Wu,&nbsp;J D Lian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nutritional status is an important factor in long term continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) prognoses. Conventionally, serum albumin is an indicator of nutritional status. More recently, protein catabolic rate and lean body mass have been calculated during peritoneal equilibrium testing to assess nutritional status. These have the advantage of providing an early indication of malnutrition before the serum albumin decreases. Bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) of nutrition has the advantage of being the simplest procedure among all nutritional assessments. Standard nutritional assessments was compared with the BIA method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protein catabolic rate and lean body mass was measured by the Keshaviah method. At the same time BIA was used to assess lean body mass, fat mass and fixed percentage of fat in 27 long-term CAPD patients, with and without peritoneal fluids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 27 patients, the protein catabolic rate was 0.95+/-0.5 g/kg/day and lean body mass was 37.4+/-0.5 kg measured by the conventional method. Using BIA, the lean body mass was 37.8+/-11.0 kg with peritoneal dialysate, which was strongly correlated with the conventional method (p<0.001). BIA of lean body mass was 37.4+/-9.2 kg without peritoneal dialysate, which was also significantly correlated to the conventional method (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BIA nutritional assessment of lean body mass was comparable to the conventional method of nutritional assessment. The presence or absence of peritoneal dialysate did not influence the BIA method for detection of lean body mass. BIA has the advantage of being a more simple procedure and can be used for the long-term assessment of nutritional status in CAPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":24073,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nutritional status is an important factor in long term continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) prognoses. Conventionally, serum albumin is an indicator of nutritional status. More recently, protein catabolic rate and lean body mass have been calculated during peritoneal equilibrium testing to assess nutritional status. These have the advantage of providing an early indication of malnutrition before the serum albumin decreases. Bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) of nutrition has the advantage of being the simplest procedure among all nutritional assessments. Standard nutritional assessments was compared with the BIA method.

Methods: The protein catabolic rate and lean body mass was measured by the Keshaviah method. At the same time BIA was used to assess lean body mass, fat mass and fixed percentage of fat in 27 long-term CAPD patients, with and without peritoneal fluids.

Results: Among the 27 patients, the protein catabolic rate was 0.95+/-0.5 g/kg/day and lean body mass was 37.4+/-0.5 kg measured by the conventional method. Using BIA, the lean body mass was 37.8+/-11.0 kg with peritoneal dialysate, which was strongly correlated with the conventional method (p<0.001). BIA of lean body mass was 37.4+/-9.2 kg without peritoneal dialysate, which was also significantly correlated to the conventional method (p<0.001).

Conclusions: BIA nutritional assessment of lean body mass was comparable to the conventional method of nutritional assessment. The presence or absence of peritoneal dialysate did not influence the BIA method for detection of lean body mass. BIA has the advantage of being a more simple procedure and can be used for the long-term assessment of nutritional status in CAPD patients.

评估连续非卧床腹膜透析患者的营养状况:生物电阻抗与常规方法的比较。
背景:营养状况是长期连续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)预后的重要因素。传统上,血清白蛋白是营养状况的指标。最近,在腹膜平衡测试中计算蛋白质分解代谢率和瘦体重来评估营养状况。这些方法的优点是在血清白蛋白减少之前提供营养不良的早期指示。营养的生物电阻抗分析(BIA)是所有营养评价中最简单的方法。将标准营养评价与BIA法进行比较。方法:采用Keshaviah法测定蛋白质分解代谢率和瘦体重。同时,应用BIA评估27例有或无腹膜液体的长期CAPD患者的瘦体重、脂肪质量和固定脂肪百分比。结果:27例患者中,常规方法测得蛋白质分解代谢率为0.95+/-0.5 g/kg/d,瘦体重为37.4+/-0.5 kg。经腹膜透析后,BIA的瘦体重为37.8+/-11.0 kg,与常规方法有很强的相关性(结论:BIA对瘦体重的营养评价与常规方法的营养评价相当)。腹膜透析液的存在与否不影响BIA法检测瘦体重。BIA的优点是操作更简单,可用于长期评估CAPD患者的营养状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信