Interlibrary loan in primary access libraries: challenging the traditional view.

R F Dudden, S Coldren, J E Condon, S Katsh, C M Reiter, P L Roth
{"title":"Interlibrary loan in primary access libraries: challenging the traditional view.","authors":"R F Dudden,&nbsp;S Coldren,&nbsp;J E Condon,&nbsp;S Katsh,&nbsp;C M Reiter,&nbsp;P L Roth","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary access libraries serve as the foundation of the National Network of Libraries of Medicine (NN/LM) interlibrary loan (ILL) hierarchy, yet few published reports directly address the important role these libraries play in the ILL system. This may reflect the traditional view that small, primary access libraries are largely users of ILL, rather than important contributors to the effectiveness and efficiency of the national ILL system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was undertaken to test several commonly held beliefs regarding ILL system use by primary access libraries.</p><p><strong>Hypotheses: </strong>Three hypotheses were developed. HI: Colorado and Wyoming primary access libraries comply with the recommended ILL guideline of adhering to a hierarchical structure, emphasizing local borrowing. H2: The closures of two Colorado Council of Medical Librarians (CCML) primary access libraries in 1996 resulted in twenty-three Colorado primary access libraries' borrowing more from their state resource library in 1997. H3: The number of subscriptions held by Colorado and Wyoming primary access libraries is positively correlated with the number of items they loan and negatively correlated with the number of items they borrow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The hypotheses were tested using the 1992 and 1997 DOCLINE and OCLC data of fifty-four health sciences libraries, including fifty primary access libraries, two state resource libraries, and two general academic libraries in Colorado and Wyoming. The ILL data were obtained electronically and analyzed using Microsoft Word 98, Microsoft Excel 98, and JMP 3.2.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CCML primary access libraries comply with the recommended guideline to emphasize local borrowing by supplying each other with the majority of their ILLs, instead of overburdening libraries located at higher levels in the ILL hierarchy (H1). The closures of two CCML primary access libraries appear to have affected the entire ILL system, resulting in a greater volume of ILL activity for the state resource library and other DOCLINE libraries higher up in the ILL hierarchy and highlighting the contribution made by CCML primary access libraries (H2). CCML primary access libraries borrow and lend in amounts that are proportional to their collection size, rather than overtaxing libraries at higher levels in the ILL hierarchy with large numbers of requests (H3).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The main limitations of this study were the small sample size and the use of data collected for another purpose, the CCML ILL survey.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that there is little evidence to support several commonly held beliefs regarding ILL system use by primary access libraries. In addition to validating the important contributions made by primary access libraries to the national ILL system, baseline data that can be used to benchmark current practice performance are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":72483,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Medical Library Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC35251/pdf/i0025-7338-088-04-0303.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Primary access libraries serve as the foundation of the National Network of Libraries of Medicine (NN/LM) interlibrary loan (ILL) hierarchy, yet few published reports directly address the important role these libraries play in the ILL system. This may reflect the traditional view that small, primary access libraries are largely users of ILL, rather than important contributors to the effectiveness and efficiency of the national ILL system.

Objective: This study was undertaken to test several commonly held beliefs regarding ILL system use by primary access libraries.

Hypotheses: Three hypotheses were developed. HI: Colorado and Wyoming primary access libraries comply with the recommended ILL guideline of adhering to a hierarchical structure, emphasizing local borrowing. H2: The closures of two Colorado Council of Medical Librarians (CCML) primary access libraries in 1996 resulted in twenty-three Colorado primary access libraries' borrowing more from their state resource library in 1997. H3: The number of subscriptions held by Colorado and Wyoming primary access libraries is positively correlated with the number of items they loan and negatively correlated with the number of items they borrow.

Methods: The hypotheses were tested using the 1992 and 1997 DOCLINE and OCLC data of fifty-four health sciences libraries, including fifty primary access libraries, two state resource libraries, and two general academic libraries in Colorado and Wyoming. The ILL data were obtained electronically and analyzed using Microsoft Word 98, Microsoft Excel 98, and JMP 3.2.2.

Results: CCML primary access libraries comply with the recommended guideline to emphasize local borrowing by supplying each other with the majority of their ILLs, instead of overburdening libraries located at higher levels in the ILL hierarchy (H1). The closures of two CCML primary access libraries appear to have affected the entire ILL system, resulting in a greater volume of ILL activity for the state resource library and other DOCLINE libraries higher up in the ILL hierarchy and highlighting the contribution made by CCML primary access libraries (H2). CCML primary access libraries borrow and lend in amounts that are proportional to their collection size, rather than overtaxing libraries at higher levels in the ILL hierarchy with large numbers of requests (H3).

Limitations: The main limitations of this study were the small sample size and the use of data collected for another purpose, the CCML ILL survey.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that there is little evidence to support several commonly held beliefs regarding ILL system use by primary access libraries. In addition to validating the important contributions made by primary access libraries to the national ILL system, baseline data that can be used to benchmark current practice performance are provided.

初级接入图书馆馆际互借:对传统观念的挑战。
主要访问图书馆是国家医学图书馆网络(NN/LM)馆际互借(ILL)层次结构的基础,然而很少有发表的报告直接解决这些图书馆在ILL系统中发挥的重要作用。这可能反映了传统的观点,即小型的主要访问图书馆主要是图书馆的用户,而不是国家图书馆系统的有效性和效率的重要贡献者。目的:本研究旨在测试主要访问图书馆使用ILL系统的几个普遍观点。假设:提出了三个假设。HI:科罗拉多州和怀俄明州的主要访问图书馆遵循了美国图书馆协会的建议,即坚持分层结构,强调当地借阅。H2: 1996年科罗拉多州医学图书馆员委员会(CCML)关闭了两家初级访问图书馆,导致1997年23家科罗拉多州初级访问图书馆从其国家资源图书馆借阅更多。H3:科罗拉多州和怀俄明州初级访问图书馆的订阅量与借阅的数量正相关,与借阅的数量负相关。方法:采用1992年和1997年美国科罗拉多州和怀俄明州54家卫生科学图书馆的DOCLINE和OCLC数据对假设进行检验,其中包括50家初级存取图书馆、2家州立资源图书馆和2家普通学术图书馆。以电子方式获取ILL数据,并使用Microsoft Word 98、Microsoft Excel 98和JMP 3.2.2进行分析。结果:CCML主要访问图书馆遵循推荐的指导方针,通过相互提供他们的大部分疾病来强调本地借阅,而不是使位于疾病层次较高的图书馆负担过重(H1)。两个CCML主访问库的关闭似乎影响了整个ILL系统,导致状态资源库和其他在ILL层次结构中较高的DOCLINE库的ILL活动量增加,并突出了CCML主访问库的贡献(H2)。CCML主访问图书馆的借阅数量与其藏书规模成正比,而不是对ILL层次结构中较高级别的图书馆造成过多的请求(H3)。局限性:本研究的主要局限性是样本量小,收集的数据用于另一个目的,CCML ILL调查。结论:研究结果表明,很少有证据支持一些关于主要访问图书馆使用ILL系统的普遍看法。除了验证主要访问库对国家ILL系统的重要贡献之外,还提供了可用于对当前实践绩效进行基准测试的基线数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信