First-line management of menorrhagia: findings from a survey of general practitioners in Forth Valley.

E Turner, P Bowie, K W McMullen, C Kellock
{"title":"First-line management of menorrhagia: findings from a survey of general practitioners in Forth Valley.","authors":"E Turner,&nbsp;P Bowie,&nbsp;K W McMullen,&nbsp;C Kellock","doi":"10.1783/147118900101194643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was undertaken to determine local GPs' current management of menorrhagia, prior to the release of the Royal College of Obs tetricians and Gynaecologists' (RCOG) guideline on the initial management of menorrhagia. A postal questionnaire was sent to 204 GPs in the Forth Valley area. An 84% (n = 173) response rate was recorded. Responses were compared with RCOG guideline recommendations after its release. Fifty-two percent of respondents measured a full blood count and 56% performed a pelvic examination. Two thirds of GPs chose the recommended treatments (mefenamic acid or tranexamic acid) as their first or second choice of treatment in women not requiring contraception. One third chose cyclical progestogens. Only 10% of GPs selected an ineffective treatment (cyclical progestogens) as their first or second choice of treatment in women requiring contraception. This survey demonstrates that the majority of GPs are already prescribing the treatments recommended in the RCOG guidelines. There is a need for education amongst a minority to improve their practice. Half of the GPs reported compliance with the recommended investigations of full blood count and pelvic examination. The point at which these investigations are performed in the initial management of menorrhagia may need further discussion between primary and secondary care clinicians to clarify their purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":22378,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of family planning","volume":"26 4","pages":"227-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1783/147118900101194643","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of family planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1783/147118900101194643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine local GPs' current management of menorrhagia, prior to the release of the Royal College of Obs tetricians and Gynaecologists' (RCOG) guideline on the initial management of menorrhagia. A postal questionnaire was sent to 204 GPs in the Forth Valley area. An 84% (n = 173) response rate was recorded. Responses were compared with RCOG guideline recommendations after its release. Fifty-two percent of respondents measured a full blood count and 56% performed a pelvic examination. Two thirds of GPs chose the recommended treatments (mefenamic acid or tranexamic acid) as their first or second choice of treatment in women not requiring contraception. One third chose cyclical progestogens. Only 10% of GPs selected an ineffective treatment (cyclical progestogens) as their first or second choice of treatment in women requiring contraception. This survey demonstrates that the majority of GPs are already prescribing the treatments recommended in the RCOG guidelines. There is a need for education amongst a minority to improve their practice. Half of the GPs reported compliance with the recommended investigations of full blood count and pelvic examination. The point at which these investigations are performed in the initial management of menorrhagia may need further discussion between primary and secondary care clinicians to clarify their purpose.

月经过多的一线管理:来自福斯谷全科医生调查的结果。
在皇家妇产科学院(RCOG)关于月经过多初始管理的指南发布之前,本研究旨在确定当地全科医生对月经过多的当前管理。向福斯谷地区204名全科医生邮寄了一份问卷。记录到84% (n = 173)的应答率。在RCOG指南发布后,对反馈进行比较。52%的受访者进行了全血细胞计数,56%进行了盆腔检查。三分之二的全科医生选择推荐的治疗方法(甲氧胺酸或氨甲环酸)作为不需要避孕的妇女的第一或第二选择。三分之一的人选择了周期孕激素。只有10%的全科医生选择无效的治疗方法(周期孕激素)作为需要避孕的妇女的第一或第二选择。这项调查表明,大多数全科医生已经在使用RCOG指南中推荐的治疗方法。有必要对少数人进行教育,以改进他们的做法。一半的全科医生报告了全血细胞计数和盆腔检查的依从性。在月经过多的初始管理中进行这些调查的点可能需要初级和二级护理临床医生进一步讨论以澄清其目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信