A comparison of primary and proxy respondent reports of habitual physical activity, using kappa statistics and log-linear models.

Abstract

Background: Many epidemiological studies rely in part on proxy informants. There is little published information on the reliability of proxy-respondent reports of physical activity.

Methods: Self-reported data on vigorous and moderate physical activity, from a representative sub-sample of participants in a community-based case-control study of coronary heart disease, were compared with information collected from their next-of-kin.

Results: Relative to primary respondents, proxy respondents under-reported activity by approximately 10 percentage points, for both leisure and work-time activity. On a simple three point scale (inactivity/moderate activity/physical activity), 70% of primary-proxy pairs were in exact agreement with regard to leisure time activity and 67% of pairs were in exact agreement on work-time activity. The corresponding values for the weighted kappa statistic were 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.72] and 0.62 (0.54-0.72). Log-linear modelling provided evidence for superior agreement on worktime activity when the proxy was not the primary respondent's spouse.

Discussion: Overall levels of primary-proxy respondent agreement on physical activity seem somewhat lower than has been reported for smoking and alcohol-drinking frequency. There seems little reason to prefer spouse proxies when endeavouring to elicit information on work-time physical activity. Log-linear modelling provides an efficient means of exploring covariate effects in observer-agreement studies.