Perinatal management of congenital complete heart block.

J J Tseng, M M Chou, E S Ho
{"title":"Perinatal management of congenital complete heart block.","authors":"J J Tseng,&nbsp;M M Chou,&nbsp;E S Ho","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The perinatal management of congenital complete heart block (CCHB) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to present a therapeutic modality for CCHB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected retrospective cases of all pregnant women admitted to our hospital between January 1992 and June 1999 whose babies developed CCHB antenatally. After a series of examinations, maternal, fetal and neonatal data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine fetuses from six mothers (cases 1-6) in nine different pregnancies were studied. In case 1, both consecutive fetuses had CCHB and in case 2, all three consecutive fetuses had CCHB. The other mothers (cases 3-6) had only one fetus each with CCHB. Of the seven fetuses with isolated CCHB, four underwent observation only due to late-onset, or nonimmunologic CCHB, two received dexamethasone and/or intravenous immunoglobulin therapy because of the presence of hydropic signs, and one received dexamethasone at 23 weeks' gestation due to early-onset CCHB. Shortening fractions of the right ventricle had good compensation in four fetuses, without any treatment, and improving compensation in two of three fetuses receiving dexamethasone therapy. All seven fetuses were delivered smoothly and pacemakers were implanted shortly after birth. Two other fetuses had a poor outcome due to associated ventricular septal defect or hemoglobin Bart's disease. Furthermore, we gave dexamethasone (2 mg/day) instead of prednisolone (10 mg/day) for the next pregnancies of patients 3 to 5, beginning at 12 weeks of gestation. No fetal CCHB developed again.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For pregnant women with previous fetal immunologic CCHB, early initiation of dexamethasone instead of prednisolone might be effective to cross the placenta and avoid recurrences. Dexamethasone is also effective for fetal CCHB of early onset, fetal hydrops or heart failure. Observation only is suggested for nonimmunologic CCHB and remote or late-onset immunologic CCHB. Other modalities were tried for very sick fetuses, but their effectiveness was not predictable.</p>","PeriodicalId":24073,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The perinatal management of congenital complete heart block (CCHB) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to present a therapeutic modality for CCHB.

Methods: We collected retrospective cases of all pregnant women admitted to our hospital between January 1992 and June 1999 whose babies developed CCHB antenatally. After a series of examinations, maternal, fetal and neonatal data were analyzed.

Results: Nine fetuses from six mothers (cases 1-6) in nine different pregnancies were studied. In case 1, both consecutive fetuses had CCHB and in case 2, all three consecutive fetuses had CCHB. The other mothers (cases 3-6) had only one fetus each with CCHB. Of the seven fetuses with isolated CCHB, four underwent observation only due to late-onset, or nonimmunologic CCHB, two received dexamethasone and/or intravenous immunoglobulin therapy because of the presence of hydropic signs, and one received dexamethasone at 23 weeks' gestation due to early-onset CCHB. Shortening fractions of the right ventricle had good compensation in four fetuses, without any treatment, and improving compensation in two of three fetuses receiving dexamethasone therapy. All seven fetuses were delivered smoothly and pacemakers were implanted shortly after birth. Two other fetuses had a poor outcome due to associated ventricular septal defect or hemoglobin Bart's disease. Furthermore, we gave dexamethasone (2 mg/day) instead of prednisolone (10 mg/day) for the next pregnancies of patients 3 to 5, beginning at 12 weeks of gestation. No fetal CCHB developed again.

Conclusions: For pregnant women with previous fetal immunologic CCHB, early initiation of dexamethasone instead of prednisolone might be effective to cross the placenta and avoid recurrences. Dexamethasone is also effective for fetal CCHB of early onset, fetal hydrops or heart failure. Observation only is suggested for nonimmunologic CCHB and remote or late-onset immunologic CCHB. Other modalities were tried for very sick fetuses, but their effectiveness was not predictable.

先天性完全性心脏传导阻滞的围产期处理。
背景:先天性完全性心脏传导阻滞(CCHB)的围产期处理仍存在争议。本研究的目的是提出一种治疗慢性乙型肝炎的方法。方法:回顾性收集1992年1月至1999年6月间在本院就诊的所有产前发生CCHB的孕妇病例。经过一系列的检查,分析了母体、胎儿和新生儿的数据。结果:研究了6位母亲(病例1-6)9个不同妊娠期的9个胎儿。在病例1中,两个连续的胎儿都患有CCHB,在病例2中,三个连续的胎儿都患有CCHB。其他母亲(病例3-6)只有1个胎儿患有CCHB。在7例分离性CCHB胎儿中,4例仅因迟发性或非免疫性CCHB而接受观察,2例因存在积水体征而接受地塞米松和/或静脉注射免疫球蛋白治疗,1例因早发性CCHB而在妊娠23周时接受地塞米松治疗。在没有任何治疗的情况下,4个胎儿右心室缩短部分具有良好的代偿性,在接受地塞米松治疗的3个胎儿中,2个胎儿的代偿性得到改善。所有七个胎儿都顺利分娩,并在出生后不久植入了起搏器。另外两个胎儿由于相关的室间隔缺损或血红蛋白Bart病而预后不佳。此外,我们给予地塞米松(2毫克/天)代替强的松龙(10毫克/天)在患者3至5次妊娠,从妊娠12周开始。无再次发生胎儿CCHB。结论:对于既往有胎儿免疫性CCHB的孕妇,早期开始使用地塞米松代替强的松龙可能有效地穿过胎盘,避免复发。地塞米松对早发性胎儿CCHB、胎儿水肿或心力衰竭也有效。仅建议对非免疫性CCHB和远端或晚发性免疫性CCHB进行观察。其他的治疗方式也被尝试用于病情严重的胎儿,但它们的效果是不可预测的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信