Approach to communication, speech perception and intelligibility after paediatric cochlear implantation.

S M Archbold, T P Nikolopoulos, M Tait, G M O'Donoghue, M E Lutman, S Gregory
{"title":"Approach to communication, speech perception and intelligibility after paediatric cochlear implantation.","authors":"S M Archbold,&nbsp;T P Nikolopoulos,&nbsp;M Tait,&nbsp;G M O'Donoghue,&nbsp;M E Lutman,&nbsp;S Gregory","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between approach to communication, speech perception and speech intelligibility after cochlear implantation of young children with profound early deafness. A prospective speech perception and speech intelligibility assessment was undertaken on a consecutive group of implanted children. There were 46 children at the three-year, 26 at the four-year and 20 at the five-year intervals. All had been born deaf or deafened before the age of three and received cochlear implants before the age of seven. Their speech perception ability and the intelligibility of their speech were measured before cochlear implantation and annually thereafter. The children's communication had been classified by their teachers of the deaf at each interval into one of two categories: those using an oral approach and those using a signing approach. Results revealed that at all intervals, those children classified as using oral communication significantly exceeded those using signed communication on measures of speech perception and intelligibility (p<0.05). When those children who had changed from signed to oral communication were compared at the three-year interval with those who used oral communication throughout, there was no significant difference in their results. However, it remains to be explored whether children use oral communication after cochlear implantation because they are doing well, or whether they do well because they are using oral communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"34 4","pages":"257-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000135","citationCount":"83","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between approach to communication, speech perception and speech intelligibility after cochlear implantation of young children with profound early deafness. A prospective speech perception and speech intelligibility assessment was undertaken on a consecutive group of implanted children. There were 46 children at the three-year, 26 at the four-year and 20 at the five-year intervals. All had been born deaf or deafened before the age of three and received cochlear implants before the age of seven. Their speech perception ability and the intelligibility of their speech were measured before cochlear implantation and annually thereafter. The children's communication had been classified by their teachers of the deaf at each interval into one of two categories: those using an oral approach and those using a signing approach. Results revealed that at all intervals, those children classified as using oral communication significantly exceeded those using signed communication on measures of speech perception and intelligibility (p<0.05). When those children who had changed from signed to oral communication were compared at the three-year interval with those who used oral communication throughout, there was no significant difference in their results. However, it remains to be explored whether children use oral communication after cochlear implantation because they are doing well, or whether they do well because they are using oral communication.

儿童人工耳蜗植入后的沟通、言语感知和可理解性的探讨。
本研究旨在探讨深度早期耳聋儿童人工耳蜗植入术后的沟通方式、言语感知和言语可理解性之间的关系。对一组连续植入的儿童进行前瞻性语音感知和语音清晰度评估。三年级有46名,四年级有26名,五年级有20名。所有人在三岁之前都是先天性失聪或耳聋,并在七岁之前接受了人工耳蜗植入。在人工耳蜗植入术前及植入术后每年对其语音感知能力和可理解性进行测量。聋哑人的老师在每个课间将孩子们的交流分为两类:使用口头方式的和使用手语方式的。结果显示,在所有时间间隔内,那些被归类为使用口头交流的儿童在言语感知和可理解性方面明显超过使用手语交流的儿童
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信