Palliative care: community nurses' perceptions of quality.

L Austin, K Luker, A Caress, C Hallett
{"title":"Palliative care: community nurses' perceptions of quality.","authors":"L Austin,&nbsp;K Luker,&nbsp;A Caress,&nbsp;C Hallett","doi":"10.1136/qhc.9.3.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify community nurses' perceptions of quality care provision for patients requiring palliative care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with community nurses working within the district nursing service. An adaptation of Flanagan's critical incident technique was employed to elicit factors associated with high or poor quality palliative care. Interviews were tape recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis, recurrent themes being agreed by the research team.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>One community healthcare trust.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>62 members of the district nursing team (grades B-H).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents recounted the context in which high quality palliative care could be provided, the actions required, and the indicators that suggested the desired level of care had been achieved. Key factors identified were: the early referral of patients to the district nursing service, family circumstances, the availability of time, the accessibility of services and equipment, and the relationship with other healthcare professionals and informal carers. There was a general view that a positive outcome had been achieved when patients retained control over their circumstances and died a peaceful death, in the place of their choice, supported by their family.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community nurses were able to articulate clearly the essential components of high quality care. Whilst these factors do not represent a comprehensive list, they are put forward as a useful starting point for standard setting and subsequent audit.</p>","PeriodicalId":20773,"journal":{"name":"Quality in health care : QHC","volume":"9 3","pages":"151-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/qhc.9.3.151","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in health care : QHC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.9.3.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Objectives: To identify community nurses' perceptions of quality care provision for patients requiring palliative care.

Design: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with community nurses working within the district nursing service. An adaptation of Flanagan's critical incident technique was employed to elicit factors associated with high or poor quality palliative care. Interviews were tape recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis, recurrent themes being agreed by the research team.

Setting: One community healthcare trust.

Subjects: 62 members of the district nursing team (grades B-H).

Results: Respondents recounted the context in which high quality palliative care could be provided, the actions required, and the indicators that suggested the desired level of care had been achieved. Key factors identified were: the early referral of patients to the district nursing service, family circumstances, the availability of time, the accessibility of services and equipment, and the relationship with other healthcare professionals and informal carers. There was a general view that a positive outcome had been achieved when patients retained control over their circumstances and died a peaceful death, in the place of their choice, supported by their family.

Conclusions: Community nurses were able to articulate clearly the essential components of high quality care. Whilst these factors do not represent a comprehensive list, they are put forward as a useful starting point for standard setting and subsequent audit.

姑息治疗:社区护士对质量的看法。
目的:了解社区护士对为需要姑息治疗的患者提供优质护理的看法。设计:对在地区护理服务机构工作的社区护士进行半结构化访谈。对Flanagan的关键事件技术进行了改编,以引出与高质量或低质量姑息治疗相关的因素。采访被录音并记录下来。数据分析采用专题内容分析,反复出现的主题由研究小组商定。环境:一个社区医疗保健信托。研究对象:62名区护理团队成员(B-H级)。结果:受访者叙述了可以提供高质量姑息治疗的背景,所需的行动,以及表明已达到预期护理水平的指标。确定的关键因素是:患者早期转介到地区护理服务、家庭情况、时间的可用性、服务和设备的可及性以及与其他保健专业人员和非正式护理人员的关系。人们普遍认为,如果病人能够控制自己的情况,并在家人的支持下,在自己选择的地点平静地死去,就取得了积极的结果。结论:社区护士能够清楚地表达高质量护理的基本组成部分。虽然这些因素并不代表一个全面的清单,但它们被提出作为标准制定和后续审计的有用起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信