Intra-arterial continuous infusion for treatment of pancreatic and biliary tract cancer.

C Zanon, O Alabiso, M Grosso, R Buosi, I Chiappino, R Clara, A Satolli, S Zai, M Bortolini, M Botta, A Mussa
{"title":"Intra-arterial continuous infusion for treatment of pancreatic and biliary tract cancer.","authors":"C Zanon,&nbsp;O Alabiso,&nbsp;M Grosso,&nbsp;R Buosi,&nbsp;I Chiappino,&nbsp;R Clara,&nbsp;A Satolli,&nbsp;S Zai,&nbsp;M Bortolini,&nbsp;M Botta,&nbsp;A Mussa","doi":"10.1385/ijgc:27:3:225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic chemotherapy does not satisfactorily improve the poor prognosis of pancreas and biliary tract cancer unresectable or metastatic to the liver. Intra-arterial infusion of antineoplastic agents can give higher concentrations to the tumor and slighter concentrations to the whole body, with a potential of efficacy and lower toxicity, due to the hepatic clearance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on a safe and ambulatorial technique of transcutaneous arterial port implantation, this study was designed to evaluate feasibility and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) intra-arterial continuous infusion combined with systemic gemcitabine with dose escalation. Seventeen patients affected by pancreatic (14) or biliary tract (3) cancer received up to six cycles of treatment. Treatment consisted of intravenous gemcitabine on d 1 and 8 and intra-arterial 5-FU continuous infusion on d 1-14 every 21 d. Dose-escalation levels were 900 and 1000 mg/m2 for gemcitabine and 8, 10, 12, 15, and 17 mg/kg/d for 5-FU. Consecutive cohorts of three patients were planned at each dose level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gastrointestinal toxicity (vomiting and diarrhea [3rd-4th degree] and gastritis), constituted the dose-limiting toxicity, with a maximum-tolerated dose of 1000 mg/m2 for gemcitabine and 15 mg/kg/d for 5-FU. Hematological toxicity was present in a minority of patients. No patient had acute or later complications such as arterial thrombosis related to the implanted arterial port, sclerosis cholangitis, or chemical cholecistitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>5-Fluorouracil intra-arterial continuous infusion, combined with systemic gemcitabine, seems to be a feasible and safe regimen that could give interesting results in pancreatic cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":73464,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1385/ijgc:27:3:225","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1385/ijgc:27:3:225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: Systemic chemotherapy does not satisfactorily improve the poor prognosis of pancreas and biliary tract cancer unresectable or metastatic to the liver. Intra-arterial infusion of antineoplastic agents can give higher concentrations to the tumor and slighter concentrations to the whole body, with a potential of efficacy and lower toxicity, due to the hepatic clearance.

Methods: Based on a safe and ambulatorial technique of transcutaneous arterial port implantation, this study was designed to evaluate feasibility and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) intra-arterial continuous infusion combined with systemic gemcitabine with dose escalation. Seventeen patients affected by pancreatic (14) or biliary tract (3) cancer received up to six cycles of treatment. Treatment consisted of intravenous gemcitabine on d 1 and 8 and intra-arterial 5-FU continuous infusion on d 1-14 every 21 d. Dose-escalation levels were 900 and 1000 mg/m2 for gemcitabine and 8, 10, 12, 15, and 17 mg/kg/d for 5-FU. Consecutive cohorts of three patients were planned at each dose level.

Results: Gastrointestinal toxicity (vomiting and diarrhea [3rd-4th degree] and gastritis), constituted the dose-limiting toxicity, with a maximum-tolerated dose of 1000 mg/m2 for gemcitabine and 15 mg/kg/d for 5-FU. Hematological toxicity was present in a minority of patients. No patient had acute or later complications such as arterial thrombosis related to the implanted arterial port, sclerosis cholangitis, or chemical cholecistitis.

Conclusion: 5-Fluorouracil intra-arterial continuous infusion, combined with systemic gemcitabine, seems to be a feasible and safe regimen that could give interesting results in pancreatic cancer.

动脉内持续输注治疗胰腺癌和胆道癌。
背景:对于不能切除或转移到肝脏的胰腺和胆道肿瘤,全身化疗不能令人满意地改善其不良预后。动脉内输注抗肿瘤药物可使肿瘤得到较高的浓度,全身得到较低的浓度,由于肝脏清除,具有潜在的疗效和较低的毒性。方法:基于安全、动态的经皮动脉移植技术,评价5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)动脉持续输注联合全身吉西他滨剂量递增的可行性和毒性。17例胰腺癌(14例)或胆道癌(3例)患者接受了长达6个周期的治疗。治疗包括在第1和第8天静脉注射吉西他滨,在第1-14天动脉内连续输注5-FU,每21天一次。吉西他滨的剂量递增水平为900和1000 mg/m2, 5-FU的剂量递增水平为8、10、12、15和17 mg/kg/d。计划在每个剂量水平下连续队列3名患者。结果:胃肠道毒性(呕吐、腹泻[3 ~ 4度]和胃炎)构成剂量限制性毒性,吉西他滨最大耐受剂量为1000 mg/m2, 5-FU最大耐受剂量为15 mg/kg/d。少数患者出现血液学毒性。没有患者出现与植入动脉端口相关的动脉血栓形成、硬化性胆管炎或化学性胆囊炎等急性或晚期并发症。结论:5-氟尿嘧啶动脉持续输注联合全身吉西他滨似乎是一种可行且安全的治疗胰腺癌的方案,可能会产生有趣的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信