Drug-drug pharmacodynamic interaction detection by a nonparametric population approach. Influence of design and of interindividual variability.

Y Merlé, A Mallet, E Schmautz
{"title":"Drug-drug pharmacodynamic interaction detection by a nonparametric population approach. Influence of design and of interindividual variability.","authors":"Y Merlé,&nbsp;A Mallet,&nbsp;E Schmautz","doi":"10.1023/a:1023290530853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Population approaches are appealing methods for detecting then assessing drug-drug interactions mainly because they can cope with sparse data and quantify the interindividual pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability. Unfortunately these methods sometime fail to detect interactions expected on biochemical and/or pharmacological basis and the reasons of these false negatives are somewhat unclear. The aim of this paper is firstly to propose a strategy to detect and assess PD drug-drug interactions when performing the analysis with a nonparametric population approach, then to evaluate the influence of some design variates (i.e., number of subjects, individual measurements) and of the PD interindividual variability level on the performances of the suggested strategy. Two interacting drugs A and B are considered, the drug B being supposed to exhibit by itself a pharmacological action of no interest in this work but increasing the A effect. Concentrations of A and B after concomitant administration are simulated as well as the effect under various combinations of design variates and PD variability levels in the context of a controlled trial. Replications of simulated data are then analyzed by the NPML method, the concentration of the drug B being included as a covariate. In a first step, no model relating the latter to each PD parameter is specified and the NPML results are then proceeded graphically, and also by examining the expected reductions of variance and entropy of the estimated PD parameter distribution provided by the covariate. In a further step, a simple second stage model suggested by the graphic approach is introduced, the fixed effect and its associated variance are estimated and a statistical test is then performed to compare this fixed effect to a given value. The performances of our strategy are also compared to those of a non-population-based approach method commonly used for detecting interactions. Our results illustrate the relevance of our strategy in a case where the concentration of one of the two drugs can be included as a covariate and show that an existing interaction can be detected more often than with a usual approach. The prominent role of the interindividual PD variability level and of the two controlled factors is also shown.</p>","PeriodicalId":16765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics","volume":"27 5","pages":"531-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1023290530853","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023290530853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Population approaches are appealing methods for detecting then assessing drug-drug interactions mainly because they can cope with sparse data and quantify the interindividual pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability. Unfortunately these methods sometime fail to detect interactions expected on biochemical and/or pharmacological basis and the reasons of these false negatives are somewhat unclear. The aim of this paper is firstly to propose a strategy to detect and assess PD drug-drug interactions when performing the analysis with a nonparametric population approach, then to evaluate the influence of some design variates (i.e., number of subjects, individual measurements) and of the PD interindividual variability level on the performances of the suggested strategy. Two interacting drugs A and B are considered, the drug B being supposed to exhibit by itself a pharmacological action of no interest in this work but increasing the A effect. Concentrations of A and B after concomitant administration are simulated as well as the effect under various combinations of design variates and PD variability levels in the context of a controlled trial. Replications of simulated data are then analyzed by the NPML method, the concentration of the drug B being included as a covariate. In a first step, no model relating the latter to each PD parameter is specified and the NPML results are then proceeded graphically, and also by examining the expected reductions of variance and entropy of the estimated PD parameter distribution provided by the covariate. In a further step, a simple second stage model suggested by the graphic approach is introduced, the fixed effect and its associated variance are estimated and a statistical test is then performed to compare this fixed effect to a given value. The performances of our strategy are also compared to those of a non-population-based approach method commonly used for detecting interactions. Our results illustrate the relevance of our strategy in a case where the concentration of one of the two drugs can be included as a covariate and show that an existing interaction can be detected more often than with a usual approach. The prominent role of the interindividual PD variability level and of the two controlled factors is also shown.

非参数群体方法的药物-药物药效相互作用检测。设计和个体间变异的影响。
群体方法是检测和评估药物-药物相互作用的有吸引力的方法,主要是因为它们可以处理稀疏的数据并量化个体间药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)的可变性。不幸的是,这些方法有时不能检测到生物化学和/或药理学基础上预期的相互作用,这些假阴性的原因有些不清楚。本文的目的是首先提出一种策略,在使用非参数总体方法进行分析时检测和评估PD药物-药物相互作用,然后评估一些设计变量(即受试者数量,个体测量值)和PD个体间变异性水平对所建议策略性能的影响。考虑两种相互作用的药物A和B,药物B本身应该表现出本研究不感兴趣的药理作用,但增加了A的作用。在对照试验的背景下,模拟了同时给药后A和B的浓度,以及在不同设计变量和PD变异性水平组合下的效果。然后用NPML方法分析模拟数据的重复,将药物B的浓度作为协变量。在第一步中,没有指定将后者与每个PD参数相关的模型,然后通过图形化处理NPML结果,并通过检查协变量提供的估计PD参数分布的方差和熵的预期减少。在进一步的步骤中,引入了一个简单的第二阶段模型,通过图形方法估计固定效应及其相关方差,然后进行统计检验,将该固定效应与给定值进行比较。我们的策略的性能还与通常用于检测相互作用的非基于群体的方法进行了比较。我们的结果说明了我们的策略在两种药物之一的浓度可以作为协变量包括的情况下的相关性,并表明现有的相互作用可以比通常的方法更经常地被检测到。个体间PD变异水平和两种控制因素的显著作用也被显示出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信