{"title":"1-Day Acuvue vs. Focus Dailies: a comparison of comfort, user preference, and incidence of corneal complications.","authors":"M Inaba","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Two types of daily disposable soft contact lenses, 1-Day Acuvue (Johnson & Johnson K.K., Japan) and Focus Dailies (CIBA Vision Corp.), were compared for comfort, user preference, and any associated incidence of corneal complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1-Day Acuvue and Focus Dailies were randomly prescribed for one eye each of 127 contact lens wearers. After 1 week of lens wear, user preference, anterior segment health, and tear film stability on the contact lenses were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A consisted of 45 subjects who had been wearing 1-Day Acuvue prior to the study and group B consisted of 82 subjects who had been wearing other types of soft contact lenses prior to the study. A statistically significant number of subjects in both group A and group B preferred 1-Day Acuvue. In group A there were significantly fewer corneal complications in the eyes with 1-Day Acuvue than in the eyes with Dailies. However, there was no difference in the incidence of corneal complications in group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If Dailies are prescribed for current 1-Day Acuvue wearers, extra care may be required. 1-Day Acuvue lenses could be prescribed successfully for those who previously wore soft contact lenses other than 1-Day Acuvue.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"26 3","pages":"141-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Two types of daily disposable soft contact lenses, 1-Day Acuvue (Johnson & Johnson K.K., Japan) and Focus Dailies (CIBA Vision Corp.), were compared for comfort, user preference, and any associated incidence of corneal complications.
Methods: 1-Day Acuvue and Focus Dailies were randomly prescribed for one eye each of 127 contact lens wearers. After 1 week of lens wear, user preference, anterior segment health, and tear film stability on the contact lenses were evaluated.
Results: Group A consisted of 45 subjects who had been wearing 1-Day Acuvue prior to the study and group B consisted of 82 subjects who had been wearing other types of soft contact lenses prior to the study. A statistically significant number of subjects in both group A and group B preferred 1-Day Acuvue. In group A there were significantly fewer corneal complications in the eyes with 1-Day Acuvue than in the eyes with Dailies. However, there was no difference in the incidence of corneal complications in group B.
Conclusions: If Dailies are prescribed for current 1-Day Acuvue wearers, extra care may be required. 1-Day Acuvue lenses could be prescribed successfully for those who previously wore soft contact lenses other than 1-Day Acuvue.