1-Day Acuvue vs. Focus Dailies: a comparison of comfort, user preference, and incidence of corneal complications.

M Inaba
{"title":"1-Day Acuvue vs. Focus Dailies: a comparison of comfort, user preference, and incidence of corneal complications.","authors":"M Inaba","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Two types of daily disposable soft contact lenses, 1-Day Acuvue (Johnson & Johnson K.K., Japan) and Focus Dailies (CIBA Vision Corp.), were compared for comfort, user preference, and any associated incidence of corneal complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1-Day Acuvue and Focus Dailies were randomly prescribed for one eye each of 127 contact lens wearers. After 1 week of lens wear, user preference, anterior segment health, and tear film stability on the contact lenses were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A consisted of 45 subjects who had been wearing 1-Day Acuvue prior to the study and group B consisted of 82 subjects who had been wearing other types of soft contact lenses prior to the study. A statistically significant number of subjects in both group A and group B preferred 1-Day Acuvue. In group A there were significantly fewer corneal complications in the eyes with 1-Day Acuvue than in the eyes with Dailies. However, there was no difference in the incidence of corneal complications in group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If Dailies are prescribed for current 1-Day Acuvue wearers, extra care may be required. 1-Day Acuvue lenses could be prescribed successfully for those who previously wore soft contact lenses other than 1-Day Acuvue.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"26 3","pages":"141-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Two types of daily disposable soft contact lenses, 1-Day Acuvue (Johnson & Johnson K.K., Japan) and Focus Dailies (CIBA Vision Corp.), were compared for comfort, user preference, and any associated incidence of corneal complications.

Methods: 1-Day Acuvue and Focus Dailies were randomly prescribed for one eye each of 127 contact lens wearers. After 1 week of lens wear, user preference, anterior segment health, and tear film stability on the contact lenses were evaluated.

Results: Group A consisted of 45 subjects who had been wearing 1-Day Acuvue prior to the study and group B consisted of 82 subjects who had been wearing other types of soft contact lenses prior to the study. A statistically significant number of subjects in both group A and group B preferred 1-Day Acuvue. In group A there were significantly fewer corneal complications in the eyes with 1-Day Acuvue than in the eyes with Dailies. However, there was no difference in the incidence of corneal complications in group B.

Conclusions: If Dailies are prescribed for current 1-Day Acuvue wearers, extra care may be required. 1-Day Acuvue lenses could be prescribed successfully for those who previously wore soft contact lenses other than 1-Day Acuvue.

1-Day Acuvue与Focus daily:舒适度、用户偏好和角膜并发症发生率的比较。
目的:比较两种日常使用的一次性软性隐形眼镜,1-Day Acuvue(强生公司,日本)和Focus Dailies (CIBA Vision Corp.)的舒适度、使用者偏好和任何相关的角膜并发症发生率。方法:对127名隐形眼镜佩戴者随机开具1天锐度和焦点每日处方。佩戴1周后,评估使用者偏好、前节健康状况和隐形眼镜泪膜稳定性。结果:A组45名受试者在研究前一直佩戴1-Day Acuvue, B组82名受试者在研究前一直佩戴其他类型的软性隐形眼镜。A组和B组均有统计学意义的受试者选择1-Day Acuvue。A组1 d acacuvue组的角膜并发症明显少于ddailies组。然而,b组在角膜并发症的发生率上没有差异。结论:如果目前1天的Acuvue佩戴者使用daily,可能需要额外的注意。对于那些以前佩戴过除1-Day Acuvue以外的软性隐形眼镜的人,可以成功处方1-Day Acuvue镜片。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信