Use of fluorescence genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) to detect the presence of alien chromatin in wheat lines differing in nuclear DNA content.

Cytometry Pub Date : 2000-09-01
J B Wetzel, A L Rayburn
{"title":"Use of fluorescence genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) to detect the presence of alien chromatin in wheat lines differing in nuclear DNA content.","authors":"J B Wetzel,&nbsp;A L Rayburn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many times small differences in genome size are reported between or within plant species in which no cytologic confirmation is made. Attempts to repeat these studies have met with limited success. The controversy then becomes whether or not these small differences that were not confirmed cytologically are real. The present study was undertaken to determine if the approximately 1% nuclear variation seen by flow cytometry among wheat lines selected for aluminum response was due to actual chromatin differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The three parental wheat cultivars used in the aluminum selection along with the isolines resulting from the selection were analyzed. One parental line had previously been reported to have alien chromatin substituted for the corresponding wheat homologous chromatin. Genomic in situ hybridization was used to determine the presence or absence of rye chromatin in three cultivars and six near-isolines of wheat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upon observing metaphase chromosomes of the Century parent and its isolines, two of the chromosomes were observed to be one-half yellow-orange, indicating rye chromatin with the remaining portion of the chromosomes and the other 40 wheat chromosomes having no label indicating wheat chromatin. In the Chisholm parent and its isolines, none of the chromosomes were labeled, indicating the absence of rye chromatin. In addition, none of the third parents' chromosomes had the rye yellow-orange signal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The wheat lines with the larger DNA contents were observed to have alien DNA present. DNA differences between the normal wheat chromosomes and the substituting alien chromatin were calculated based on total chromosome length. The increase in genome size of the wheat lines containing the alien chromatin appears to be the result of the alien chromatin having approximately 43% more DNA than the wheat chromatin it is replacing. Thus, the small DNA difference previously reported by flow cytometry was demonstrated to be a real DNA variation due to the presence of small fragments of alien chromosomes added to the wheat genome.</p>","PeriodicalId":10947,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry","volume":"41 1","pages":"36-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many times small differences in genome size are reported between or within plant species in which no cytologic confirmation is made. Attempts to repeat these studies have met with limited success. The controversy then becomes whether or not these small differences that were not confirmed cytologically are real. The present study was undertaken to determine if the approximately 1% nuclear variation seen by flow cytometry among wheat lines selected for aluminum response was due to actual chromatin differences.

Methods: The three parental wheat cultivars used in the aluminum selection along with the isolines resulting from the selection were analyzed. One parental line had previously been reported to have alien chromatin substituted for the corresponding wheat homologous chromatin. Genomic in situ hybridization was used to determine the presence or absence of rye chromatin in three cultivars and six near-isolines of wheat.

Results: Upon observing metaphase chromosomes of the Century parent and its isolines, two of the chromosomes were observed to be one-half yellow-orange, indicating rye chromatin with the remaining portion of the chromosomes and the other 40 wheat chromosomes having no label indicating wheat chromatin. In the Chisholm parent and its isolines, none of the chromosomes were labeled, indicating the absence of rye chromatin. In addition, none of the third parents' chromosomes had the rye yellow-orange signal.

Conclusions: The wheat lines with the larger DNA contents were observed to have alien DNA present. DNA differences between the normal wheat chromosomes and the substituting alien chromatin were calculated based on total chromosome length. The increase in genome size of the wheat lines containing the alien chromatin appears to be the result of the alien chromatin having approximately 43% more DNA than the wheat chromatin it is replacing. Thus, the small DNA difference previously reported by flow cytometry was demonstrated to be a real DNA variation due to the presence of small fragments of alien chromosomes added to the wheat genome.

利用荧光基因组原位杂交(GISH)检测核DNA含量不同的小麦系中外来染色质的存在。
背景:很多时候,在没有细胞学证实的植物物种之间或物种内部,基因组大小的微小差异被报道。重复这些研究的尝试取得了有限的成功。争论就变成了这些没有被细胞学证实的小差异是否真实。本研究的目的是确定在选择用于铝反应的小麦系中,流式细胞术观察到的大约1%的核变异是否由于实际的染色质差异。方法:对3个用于铝选育的亲本小麦品种及其选育结果进行分析。一个亲本系以前曾报道用外来染色质取代了相应的小麦同源染色质。用基因组原位杂交技术测定了3个品种和6个近等值系小麦中黑麦染色质的存在与否。结果:对世纪亲本及其同染色体的中期染色体进行观察,发现其中两条染色体呈半黄橙色,为黑麦染色质,其余部分为黑麦染色质,其余40条小麦染色体无小麦染色质标记。在Chisholm亲本及其同系中,没有一条染色体被标记,表明没有黑麦染色质。此外,第三对亲本的染色体都没有黑麦黄橙色信号。结论:DNA含量较高的小麦品系存在外源DNA。根据染色体总长度计算正常小麦染色体与替代的外来染色质之间的DNA差异。含有外源染色质的小麦品系基因组大小的增加似乎是由于外源染色质比它所取代的小麦染色质拥有大约43%的DNA。因此,流式细胞术先前报道的微小DNA差异被证明是由于添加到小麦基因组中的外来染色体小片段的存在而导致的真正的DNA变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信