Proposed flow cytometric reference method for the determination of erythroid F-cell counts.

Cytometry Pub Date : 2000-08-15
J C Chen, N Bigelow, B H Davis
{"title":"Proposed flow cytometric reference method for the determination of erythroid F-cell counts.","authors":"J C Chen,&nbsp;N Bigelow,&nbsp;B H Davis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitation of adult erythrocytes (RBC) containing fetal hemoglobin (F cells) is of potential clinical utility in evaluating erythropoietic disorders, such as myelodysplasia and hemoglobinopathies, and in monitoring F-cell augmenting therapy. F-cell counting methodologies include fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Previous flow cytometric methods have employed an isotype antibody control to distinguish F cells from non-F cells. We investigated the feasibility of using the orange autofluorescence signal (FL2) in glutaraldehyde-fixed RBC to substitute for fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled isotype control antibody use in F-cell quantitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our previously published method for fetal red cell detection in fetomaternal hemorrhage was used, employing a FITC-labeled anti-hemoglobin F (HbF) monoclonal antibody reagent. Blood samples with varying F-cell counts were quantitated for F cells using both immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry comparing FITC-labeled isotype to FL1 thresholding defined by FL2 autofluorescence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>F cell percentages obtained by using an FL2 defined threshold for FL1 gating correlated well with expected values in diluted blood samples (r(2) = 0.994, slope = 1. 019, intercept = 0.24), values obtained using an isotype control (r(2) = 0.996, slope = 1.012, intercept = -0.17), and microscopic immunofluorescence counts (r(2) = 0.989, slope = 0.999, intercept = -0.72). F-cell quantitation by the isotype control and FL2 autofluorescence methods was also comparable in 40 blood samples (r(2) = 0.994, slope = 1.014, intercept = 0.03). Intra-assay, interobserver, and interinstrument precision with this autofluorescence gating method exhibited low imprecision (coefficient of variation <14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This novel method is a more objective and less laborious alternative for F-cell quantitation by flow cytometry compared to using an isotype control or microscopy, thereby providing a more robust methodology for clinical studies and consideration as a laboratory reference method for F-cell counting.</p>","PeriodicalId":10947,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry","volume":"42 4","pages":"239-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quantitation of adult erythrocytes (RBC) containing fetal hemoglobin (F cells) is of potential clinical utility in evaluating erythropoietic disorders, such as myelodysplasia and hemoglobinopathies, and in monitoring F-cell augmenting therapy. F-cell counting methodologies include fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Previous flow cytometric methods have employed an isotype antibody control to distinguish F cells from non-F cells. We investigated the feasibility of using the orange autofluorescence signal (FL2) in glutaraldehyde-fixed RBC to substitute for fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled isotype control antibody use in F-cell quantitation.

Methods: Our previously published method for fetal red cell detection in fetomaternal hemorrhage was used, employing a FITC-labeled anti-hemoglobin F (HbF) monoclonal antibody reagent. Blood samples with varying F-cell counts were quantitated for F cells using both immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry comparing FITC-labeled isotype to FL1 thresholding defined by FL2 autofluorescence.

Results: F cell percentages obtained by using an FL2 defined threshold for FL1 gating correlated well with expected values in diluted blood samples (r(2) = 0.994, slope = 1. 019, intercept = 0.24), values obtained using an isotype control (r(2) = 0.996, slope = 1.012, intercept = -0.17), and microscopic immunofluorescence counts (r(2) = 0.989, slope = 0.999, intercept = -0.72). F-cell quantitation by the isotype control and FL2 autofluorescence methods was also comparable in 40 blood samples (r(2) = 0.994, slope = 1.014, intercept = 0.03). Intra-assay, interobserver, and interinstrument precision with this autofluorescence gating method exhibited low imprecision (coefficient of variation <14%).

Conclusion: This novel method is a more objective and less laborious alternative for F-cell quantitation by flow cytometry compared to using an isotype control or microscopy, thereby providing a more robust methodology for clinical studies and consideration as a laboratory reference method for F-cell counting.

提出了流式细胞法测定红细胞f细胞计数的参考方法。
背景:对含有胎儿血红蛋白(F细胞)的成人红细胞(RBC)进行定量检测,在评估红细胞生成障碍(如骨髓发育不良和血红蛋白病)和监测F细胞增强治疗方面具有潜在的临床应用价值。f细胞计数方法包括荧光显微镜和流式细胞术。以前的流式细胞术方法采用同型抗体对照来区分F细胞和非F细胞。我们研究了在戊二醛固定红细胞中使用橙色自身荧光信号(FL2)来替代荧光素异硫氰酸酯(FITC)标记的同型对照抗体用于f细胞定量的可行性。方法:采用我们之前发表的胎母出血胎儿红细胞检测方法,采用fitc标记的抗血红蛋白F (HbF)单克隆抗体试剂。使用免疫荧光显微镜和流式细胞术对具有不同F细胞计数的血液样本进行F细胞定量,比较fitc标记的同型和FL2自身荧光定义的FL1阈值。结果:使用FL2定义的FL1门控阈值获得的F细胞百分比与稀释后血液样本的期望值相关良好(r(2) = 0.994,斜率= 1)。019,截距= 0.24),使用同型对照获得的值(r(2) = 0.996,斜率= 1.012,截距= -0.17),以及显微镜下免疫荧光计数(r(2) = 0.989,斜率= 0.999,截距= -0.72)。同型对照法和FL2自体荧光法在40份血样中的f细胞定量也具有可比性(r(2) = 0.994,斜率= 1.014,截距= 0.03)。结论:与使用同型对照或显微镜相比,这种新方法是流式细胞术中f细胞定量的更客观、更省力的替代方法,因此为临床研究提供了更可靠的方法,并考虑作为f细胞计数的实验室参考方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信