E M Hunkeler, J F Meresman, W A Hargreaves, B Fireman, W H Berman, A J Kirsch, J Groebe, S W Hurt, P Braden, M Getzell, P A Feigenbaum, T Peng, M Salzer
{"title":"Efficacy of nurse telehealth care and peer support in augmenting treatment of depression in primary care.","authors":"E M Hunkeler, J F Meresman, W A Hargreaves, B Fireman, W H Berman, A J Kirsch, J Groebe, S W Hurt, P Braden, M Getzell, P A Feigenbaum, T Peng, M Salzer","doi":"10.1001/archfami.9.8.700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care treatment of depression needs improvement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of 2 augmentations to antidepressant drug treatment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized trial comparing usual care, telehealth care, and telehealth care plus peer support; assessments were conducted at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two managed care adult primary care clinics.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 302 patients starting antidepressant drug therapy.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>For telehealth care: emotional support and focused behavioral interventions in ten 6-minute calls during 4 months by primary care nurses; and for peer support: telephone and in-person supportive contacts by trained health plan members recovered from depression.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>For depression: the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory; and for mental and physical functioning: the SF-12 Mental and Physical Composite Scales and treatment satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nurse-based telehealth patients with or without peer support more often experienced 50% improvement on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 6 weeks (50% vs 37%; P =.01) and 6 months (57% vs 38%; P =.003) and on the Beck Depression Inventory at 6 months (48% vs 37%; P =. 05) and greater quantitative reduction in symptom scores on the Hamilton scale at 6 months (10.38 vs 8.12; P =.006). Telehealth care improved mental functioning at 6 weeks (47.07 vs 42.64; P =.004) and treatment satisfaction at 6 weeks (4.41 vs 4.17; P =.004) and 6 months (4.20 vs 3.94; P =.001). Adding peer support to telehealth care did not improve the primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse telehealth care improves clinical outcomes of antidepressant drug treatment and patient satisfaction and fits well within busy primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8295,"journal":{"name":"Archives of family medicine","volume":"9 8","pages":"700-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"483","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.8.700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 483
Abstract
Background: Primary care treatment of depression needs improvement.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of 2 augmentations to antidepressant drug treatment.
Design: Randomized trial comparing usual care, telehealth care, and telehealth care plus peer support; assessments were conducted at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months.
Setting: Two managed care adult primary care clinics.
Participants: A total of 302 patients starting antidepressant drug therapy.
Interventions: For telehealth care: emotional support and focused behavioral interventions in ten 6-minute calls during 4 months by primary care nurses; and for peer support: telephone and in-person supportive contacts by trained health plan members recovered from depression.
Main outcome measures: For depression: the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory; and for mental and physical functioning: the SF-12 Mental and Physical Composite Scales and treatment satisfaction.
Results: Nurse-based telehealth patients with or without peer support more often experienced 50% improvement on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 6 weeks (50% vs 37%; P =.01) and 6 months (57% vs 38%; P =.003) and on the Beck Depression Inventory at 6 months (48% vs 37%; P =. 05) and greater quantitative reduction in symptom scores on the Hamilton scale at 6 months (10.38 vs 8.12; P =.006). Telehealth care improved mental functioning at 6 weeks (47.07 vs 42.64; P =.004) and treatment satisfaction at 6 weeks (4.41 vs 4.17; P =.004) and 6 months (4.20 vs 3.94; P =.001). Adding peer support to telehealth care did not improve the primary outcomes.
Conclusion: Nurse telehealth care improves clinical outcomes of antidepressant drug treatment and patient satisfaction and fits well within busy primary care settings.
背景:抑郁症的初级保健治疗需要改进。目的:评价两种强化治疗抗抑郁药物的疗效。设计:随机试验,比较常规护理、远程医疗和远程医疗加同伴支持;在基线、6周和6个月时进行评估。环境:两个管理式护理成人初级保健诊所。参与者:共有302名患者开始抗抑郁药物治疗。干预措施:远程保健:由初级保健护士在4个月内进行10次6分钟电话的情感支持和重点行为干预;同伴支持:由从抑郁症中康复的健康计划成员进行电话和面对面的支持联系。主要观察指标:抑郁症:汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表和贝克抑郁量表;精神和身体功能方面:SF-12精神和身体综合量表和治疗满意度。结果:以护士为基础的远程医疗患者在有或没有同伴支持的情况下,在6周时汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(Hamilton Depression Rating Scale)上往往有50%的改善(50% vs 37%;P = 0.01)和6个月(57% vs 38%;P = 0.003)和6个月的贝克抑郁量表(48% vs 37%;P =。在6个月时,汉密尔顿量表的症状评分有更大的定量下降(10.38 vs 8.12;P = .006)。远程医疗可改善6周患者的心理功能(47.07 vs 42.64;P = 0.004)和6周治疗满意度(4.41 vs 4.17;P = 0.004)和6个月(4.20 vs 3.94;P =措施)。在远程保健中增加同伴支持并没有改善主要结果。结论:护士远程保健提高了抗抑郁药物治疗的临床效果和患者满意度,适合繁忙的初级保健机构。