Evaluation of migraineurs' preferences for naratriptan over conventional first-line agents.

C Powers, S Szeto, D Pangtay, T Bort, M Cervi, R Cady
{"title":"Evaluation of migraineurs' preferences for naratriptan over conventional first-line agents.","authors":"C Powers,&nbsp;S Szeto,&nbsp;D Pangtay,&nbsp;T Bort,&nbsp;M Cervi,&nbsp;R Cady","doi":"10.1001/archfami.9.8.753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess patient satisfaction with and preference for naratriptan hydrochloride therapy over previous \"nontriptan\" therapy for migraines.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Open-label study conducted at 15 primary care clinics.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>One hundred forty-three adults meeting International Headache Society diagnostic criteria for migraine who were not using triptans as first-line therapy for migraines were enrolled; 115 completed the study. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS: At baseline, satisfaction with current migraine therapy was assessed. Patients were provided with naratriptan hydrochloride, 2.5 mg, to treat 3 migraines and diaries to record headache symptoms and response to treatment. After treating 3 migraines, satisfaction with naratriptan therapy and preference for either previous or naratriptan therapy were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-nine (62%) of 143 patients had previous exposure to triptans, with lack of prescribing (55%) as the primary reason for not continuing their use as first-line therapy. Medications used for first-line therapy included simple analgesics (59%), combination products (46%), and narcotics (13%). After treating 3 migraines with naratriptan, satisfaction with migraine therapy increased from 47% to 75%. Sixty-three percent of patients preferred naratriptan therapy over their previous nontriptan therapy, 27% preferred their previous therapy, and 10% had no preference. The main reasons for preference for naratriptan therapy were \"relieves pain effectively\" (86%) and \"restores ability to function/perform task\" (81%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Naratriptan for first-line migraine therapy was preferred by most patients over previous nontriptan therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8295,"journal":{"name":"Archives of family medicine","volume":"9 8","pages":"753-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.8.753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Objective: To assess patient satisfaction with and preference for naratriptan hydrochloride therapy over previous "nontriptan" therapy for migraines.

Design and setting: Open-label study conducted at 15 primary care clinics.

Patients: One hundred forty-three adults meeting International Headache Society diagnostic criteria for migraine who were not using triptans as first-line therapy for migraines were enrolled; 115 completed the study. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS: At baseline, satisfaction with current migraine therapy was assessed. Patients were provided with naratriptan hydrochloride, 2.5 mg, to treat 3 migraines and diaries to record headache symptoms and response to treatment. After treating 3 migraines, satisfaction with naratriptan therapy and preference for either previous or naratriptan therapy were assessed.

Results: Eighty-nine (62%) of 143 patients had previous exposure to triptans, with lack of prescribing (55%) as the primary reason for not continuing their use as first-line therapy. Medications used for first-line therapy included simple analgesics (59%), combination products (46%), and narcotics (13%). After treating 3 migraines with naratriptan, satisfaction with migraine therapy increased from 47% to 75%. Sixty-three percent of patients preferred naratriptan therapy over their previous nontriptan therapy, 27% preferred their previous therapy, and 10% had no preference. The main reasons for preference for naratriptan therapy were "relieves pain effectively" (86%) and "restores ability to function/perform task" (81%).

Conclusion: Naratriptan for first-line migraine therapy was preferred by most patients over previous nontriptan therapy.

评价偏头痛患者对纳曲坦的偏好优于传统一线药物。
目的:评价患者对盐酸纳曲坦治疗偏头痛的满意度和偏好。设计和设置:在15个初级保健诊所进行的开放标签研究。患者:纳入143名符合国际头痛协会偏头痛诊断标准的成年人,他们没有使用曲坦类药物作为偏头痛的一线治疗方法;115人完成了这项研究。干预和结果评估:基线时,评估当前偏头痛治疗的满意度。患者给予盐酸纳曲坦2.5 mg治疗3次偏头痛,并记录头痛症状和治疗效果。治疗3次偏头痛后,评估对纳曲坦治疗的满意度和对既往或纳曲坦治疗的偏好。结果:143例患者中有89例(62%)曾接触过曲坦类药物,缺乏处方(55%)是不继续使用曲坦类药物作为一线治疗的主要原因。用于一线治疗的药物包括简单镇痛药(59%)、联合用药(46%)和麻醉药(13%)。用纳曲坦治疗3例偏头痛后,偏头痛治疗的满意度从47%提高到75%。与之前的非曲坦类药物治疗相比,63%的患者更喜欢纳曲坦治疗,27%的患者更喜欢以前的治疗,10%的患者没有偏好。选择纳曲坦治疗的主要原因是“有效缓解疼痛”(86%)和“恢复功能/执行任务的能力”(81%)。结论:与以往的非曲曲坦类药物治疗相比,大多数患者更倾向于将纳曲坦作为偏头痛的一线治疗药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信