[Assessment on intermittent intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis].

Ryumachi. [Rheumatism] Pub Date : 2000-06-01
T Okubo, H Ideguchi, A Ihata, M Nakamura, A Ueda, S Ohno, E Hagiwara, A Aoki, A Shirai, Y Ishigatsubo
{"title":"[Assessment on intermittent intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis].","authors":"T Okubo,&nbsp;H Ideguchi,&nbsp;A Ihata,&nbsp;M Nakamura,&nbsp;A Ueda,&nbsp;S Ohno,&nbsp;E Hagiwara,&nbsp;A Aoki,&nbsp;A Shirai,&nbsp;Y Ishigatsubo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy (IVCY) is effective for treating patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis (DPLN) who were 1) refractory to methylprednisolone pulse therapy (MP) or 2) could not be treated with MP because of severe diabetes or steroid induced psychosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven patients with biopsy proven DPLN were studied after informed consent. Five of them received IVCY after a failure to achieve renal remission with at least 2 cycles of MP therapy. Of the other 2 patients, one had severe diabetes and the other a history of steroid induced psychosis. Bolus therapy with cyclophosphamide (0.5 g/m2 body surface area) was given once a month for 6 consecutive months and then once every 3 months for a total treatment period of 1 year. All patients were given oral prednisone, 0.5 mg/kg per day. The prednisone dose was tapered to the minimal dose required for controlling the disease. After 1 year, the renal status of the patients were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1 year, 4 of the 7 patients achieved substantial improvement. Although the other 3 patients did not satisfy the definition of substantial improvement, none of them had progressive disease. Adverse events were mild and did not require any treatment, with 2 cases of leukocytopenia without fever or major infection. No cases of hemorrhagic cystitis or amenorrhea were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IVCY was 1) effective in the treatment of DPLN which was refractory to MP and 2) relatively safe with minimal side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":76507,"journal":{"name":"Ryumachi. [Rheumatism]","volume":"40 3","pages":"605-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ryumachi. [Rheumatism]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy (IVCY) is effective for treating patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis (DPLN) who were 1) refractory to methylprednisolone pulse therapy (MP) or 2) could not be treated with MP because of severe diabetes or steroid induced psychosis.

Methods: Seven patients with biopsy proven DPLN were studied after informed consent. Five of them received IVCY after a failure to achieve renal remission with at least 2 cycles of MP therapy. Of the other 2 patients, one had severe diabetes and the other a history of steroid induced psychosis. Bolus therapy with cyclophosphamide (0.5 g/m2 body surface area) was given once a month for 6 consecutive months and then once every 3 months for a total treatment period of 1 year. All patients were given oral prednisone, 0.5 mg/kg per day. The prednisone dose was tapered to the minimal dose required for controlling the disease. After 1 year, the renal status of the patients were evaluated.

Results: At 1 year, 4 of the 7 patients achieved substantial improvement. Although the other 3 patients did not satisfy the definition of substantial improvement, none of them had progressive disease. Adverse events were mild and did not require any treatment, with 2 cases of leukocytopenia without fever or major infection. No cases of hemorrhagic cystitis or amenorrhea were observed.

Conclusions: IVCY was 1) effective in the treatment of DPLN which was refractory to MP and 2) relatively safe with minimal side effects.

间歇性静脉注射环磷酰胺治疗弥漫性增殖性狼疮性肾炎疗效评价
目的:探讨静脉环磷酰胺脉冲治疗(IVCY)治疗弥漫性增殖性狼疮性肾炎(DPLN)患者是否有效:1)甲基强的松龙脉冲治疗(MP)难治性或2)因严重糖尿病或类固醇性精神病而不能使用MP治疗。方法:在知情同意后,对7例活检证实的DPLN患者进行研究。其中5名患者在接受至少2个周期的MP治疗后未能达到肾脏缓解后接受了IVCY。另外2例患者中,1例患有严重糖尿病,另1例有类固醇性精神病史。环磷酰胺(0.5 g/m2体表面积)每月1次,连续6个月,然后每3个月1次,共治疗1年。所有患者口服强的松,0.5 mg/kg / d。泼尼松剂量逐渐减少到控制疾病所需的最小剂量。1年后,评估患者的肾脏状况。结果:1年后,7例患者中有4例获得明显改善。另外3例患者虽未达到实质性改善的定义,但均无进展。不良事件轻微,不需要任何治疗,2例白细胞减少,无发热或严重感染。无出血性膀胱炎、闭经病例。结论:IVCY治疗难治性MP的DPLN有效,且相对安全,副作用小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信