Lesions of the internal auditory canal and cerebellopontine angle in an only hearing ear: is surgery ever advisable?

The American journal of otology Pub Date : 2000-07-01
C L Driscoll, R K Jackler, L H Pitts, D E Brackmann
{"title":"Lesions of the internal auditory canal and cerebellopontine angle in an only hearing ear: is surgery ever advisable?","authors":"C L Driscoll,&nbsp;R K Jackler,&nbsp;L H Pitts,&nbsp;D E Brackmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To define the indications for surgery in lesions of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and cerebellopontine angle (CPA) in an only hearing ear.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Seven patients with lesions of the IAC and CPA who were deaf on the side opposite the lesion. Five patients had vestibular schwannoma (VS), and one each had meningioma and progressive osseous stenosis of the IAC, respectively. The opposite ear was deaf from three different causes: VS (neurofibromatosis type 2 [NF2]), sudden sensorineural hearing loss, idiopathic IAC stenosis.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>Middle fossa removal of VS in five, retrosigmoid resection of meningioma in one, and middle fossa IAC osseous decompression in one.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Hearing as measured on pure-tone and speech audiometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative hearing was class A in four patients, class B in two, and class C in one. Postoperative hearing was class A in three patients, class B in one, class C in two, and class D in one.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the vast majority of neurotologic lesions in an only hearing ear are best managed nonoperatively, in highly selected cases surgical intervention is warranted. Surgical intervention should be considered when one or more of the following circumstances is present: (1) predicted natural history of the disease is relatively rapid loss of the remaining hearing, (2) substantial brainstem compression has evolved (e.g., large acoustic neuroma), and/or (3) operative intervention may result in improvement of hearing or carries relatively low risk of hearing loss (e.g., CPA meningioma).</p>","PeriodicalId":76596,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of otology","volume":"21 4","pages":"573-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To define the indications for surgery in lesions of the internal auditory canal (IAC) and cerebellopontine angle (CPA) in an only hearing ear.

Study design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: Seven patients with lesions of the IAC and CPA who were deaf on the side opposite the lesion. Five patients had vestibular schwannoma (VS), and one each had meningioma and progressive osseous stenosis of the IAC, respectively. The opposite ear was deaf from three different causes: VS (neurofibromatosis type 2 [NF2]), sudden sensorineural hearing loss, idiopathic IAC stenosis.

Intervention(s): Middle fossa removal of VS in five, retrosigmoid resection of meningioma in one, and middle fossa IAC osseous decompression in one.

Main outcome measure: Hearing as measured on pure-tone and speech audiometry.

Results: Preoperative hearing was class A in four patients, class B in two, and class C in one. Postoperative hearing was class A in three patients, class B in one, class C in two, and class D in one.

Conclusions: Although the vast majority of neurotologic lesions in an only hearing ear are best managed nonoperatively, in highly selected cases surgical intervention is warranted. Surgical intervention should be considered when one or more of the following circumstances is present: (1) predicted natural history of the disease is relatively rapid loss of the remaining hearing, (2) substantial brainstem compression has evolved (e.g., large acoustic neuroma), and/or (3) operative intervention may result in improvement of hearing or carries relatively low risk of hearing loss (e.g., CPA meningioma).

内耳道和桥小脑角病变的唯一听力:手术是否可取?
目的:探讨单听耳内耳道及桥小脑角病变的手术适应证。研究设计:回顾性病例系列。单位:三级转诊中心。患者:7例IAC和CPA病变患者,对侧耳聋。前庭神经鞘瘤(VS) 5例,脑膜瘤1例,IAC进行性骨性狭窄1例。2型神经纤维瘤病(NF2)、突发性感音神经性听力损失、特发性IAC狭窄3种不同原因导致对耳聋。干预措施:5例中窝VS切除术,1例乙状结肠后脑膜瘤切除术,1例中窝IAC骨减压。主要结果测量:纯音听力和语音听力。结果:术前听力A级4例,B级2例,C级1例。术后听力A级3例,B级1例,C级2例,D级1例。结论:尽管绝大多数单听耳的神经病变最好采用非手术治疗,但在高度选定的病例中,手术干预是必要的。当出现以下一种或多种情况时,应考虑手术干预:(1)预测疾病的自然史是剩余听力的相对快速丧失,(2)大量脑干压迫已演变(例如,大听神经瘤),和/或(3)手术干预可能导致听力改善或听力丧失的风险相对较低(例如,CPA脑膜瘤)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信