Interactive telecardiology for the evaluation of heart murmurs in children.

M E McConnell, R D Steed, J M Tichenor, D W Hannon
{"title":"Interactive telecardiology for the evaluation of heart murmurs in children.","authors":"M E McConnell,&nbsp;R D Steed,&nbsp;J M Tichenor,&nbsp;D W Hannon","doi":"10.1089/107830299312113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the accuracy, patient satisfaction, and cost of telecardiographic evaluations of pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients referred to a rural pediatric cardiology outreach clinic were examined in person by a pediatric cardiologist. A second pediatric cardiologist who had no knowledge of the findings of face-to-face examination reevaluated the same patients utilizing a 768-Kbps telemedicine system. Any additional testing was performed by personnel who had no knowledge of the face-to-face evaluation. The main outcome measures included the final cardiac diagnosis, frequency of additional tests such as electrocardiography, (ECG) echocardiography (ECHO), and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The diagnosis was agreed upon in 19 of the 21 patients studied. Two patients with small ventricular septal defects were missed during the telemedicine evaluation. The utilization rates of additional studies for both the face-to-face cardiologist and the telemedicine cardiologist were not significantly different. Patient satisfaction with the telemedicine encounter was good.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telemedicine appears to be effective and useful for the cardiac evaluation of pediatric patients. In spite of high data-transfer rates, differences between telemedicine and face-to-face patient encounters were observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":79734,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":"5 2","pages":"157-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/107830299312113","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/107830299312113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Objective: To study the accuracy, patient satisfaction, and cost of telecardiographic evaluations of pediatric patients.

Materials and methods: Patients referred to a rural pediatric cardiology outreach clinic were examined in person by a pediatric cardiologist. A second pediatric cardiologist who had no knowledge of the findings of face-to-face examination reevaluated the same patients utilizing a 768-Kbps telemedicine system. Any additional testing was performed by personnel who had no knowledge of the face-to-face evaluation. The main outcome measures included the final cardiac diagnosis, frequency of additional tests such as electrocardiography, (ECG) echocardiography (ECHO), and patient satisfaction.

Results: The diagnosis was agreed upon in 19 of the 21 patients studied. Two patients with small ventricular septal defects were missed during the telemedicine evaluation. The utilization rates of additional studies for both the face-to-face cardiologist and the telemedicine cardiologist were not significantly different. Patient satisfaction with the telemedicine encounter was good.

Conclusions: Telemedicine appears to be effective and useful for the cardiac evaluation of pediatric patients. In spite of high data-transfer rates, differences between telemedicine and face-to-face patient encounters were observed.

交互式心电学评价儿童心脏杂音。
目的:探讨小儿心电图评估的准确性、患者满意度和成本。材料和方法:转诊到农村儿科心脏病门诊的患者由儿科心脏病专家亲自检查。另一位不知道面对面检查结果的儿科心脏病专家利用768-Kbps远程医疗系统重新评估了相同的患者。任何额外的测试都是由不了解面对面评估的人员进行的。主要结局指标包括最终的心脏诊断、心电图(ECG)超声心动图(ECHO)等附加检查的频率和患者满意度。结果:21例患者中有19例的诊断一致。2例小室间隔缺损患者在远程医疗评估中被遗漏。面对面心脏科医生和远程医疗心脏科医生的额外研究利用率没有显著差异。患者对远程医疗的满意度很高。结论:远程医疗对儿科患者的心脏评估是有效和有用的。尽管数据传输速率高,但观察到远程医疗和面对面患者接触之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信