Toward a clinical procedure for narrowband gap detection I: a psychophysical procedure.

M Florentine, S Buus, W Geng
{"title":"Toward a clinical procedure for narrowband gap detection I: a psychophysical procedure.","authors":"M Florentine,&nbsp;S Buus,&nbsp;W Geng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines a possible procedure for a clinical gap-detection test that is simple, frequency specific, and reliable. A cued yes-no method of maximum likelihood (MML) procedure was compared to an up-down three-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice procedure. Results from five trained and seven naive listeners indicate that the yes-no MML procedure yields valid and efficient estimates of narrowband gap-detection thresholds. Preliminary tests yield encouraging results.</p>","PeriodicalId":75571,"journal":{"name":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","volume":"39 3","pages":"161-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines a possible procedure for a clinical gap-detection test that is simple, frequency specific, and reliable. A cued yes-no method of maximum likelihood (MML) procedure was compared to an up-down three-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice procedure. Results from five trained and seven naive listeners indicate that the yes-no MML procedure yields valid and efficient estimates of narrowband gap-detection thresholds. Preliminary tests yield encouraging results.

窄带间隙检测的临床程序ⅰ:心理物理程序。
本文探讨了一个可能的程序,为临床间隙检测测试,是简单的,频率特异性,和可靠的。最大似然(MML)过程的提示是-否方法与上下三区间,两种选择,强制选择过程进行比较。来自5个训练过的听者和7个幼稚听者的结果表明,是-否MML过程产生了有效和有效的窄带间隙检测阈值估计。初步测试产生了令人鼓舞的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信