The effect of implant design and bone density on maximum torque and holding power for femoral neck fracture devices.

Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Pub Date : 2000-01-01
F Eriksson, P Mattsson, S Larsson
{"title":"The effect of implant design and bone density on maximum torque and holding power for femoral neck fracture devices.","authors":"F Eriksson,&nbsp;P Mattsson,&nbsp;S Larsson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Displacement of internally fixed femoral neck fractures due to implant migration is a common problem. This in vitro study was performed to compare maximum torque and holding power for five different implants.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Synthetic porous material with low, medium or high density was used to simulate cancellous bone. The tested implants included three conventional screws (AO, Olmed, Hansson), one screw with threads and a barb (Hybrid), and a pin with a hook (LIH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Hansson screw provided higher maximum torque in low and medium density blocks when compared with the other implants (p < 0.0001) followed by LIH, Hybrid, Olmed, and AO. For high-density blocks there was no significant difference between Hansson and Hybrid screws, both with significantly higher torque than the other implants. The maximal pullout in low-density blocks differed significantly between all five implants with the Hansson screw providing the highest holding power. For medium and high-density blocks the conventional screws had significantly higher pullout resistance compared with the Hybrid and LIH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The in vitro model used seemed to provide reproducible and clinically relevant results. There was a good correlation between material density and holding power for all implants. Screws inserted without predrilling provided higher maximal torque while maximal pull out load seemed less affected by predrilling being used or not.</p>","PeriodicalId":75495,"journal":{"name":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae","volume":"89 2","pages":"119-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Displacement of internally fixed femoral neck fractures due to implant migration is a common problem. This in vitro study was performed to compare maximum torque and holding power for five different implants.

Material and methods: Synthetic porous material with low, medium or high density was used to simulate cancellous bone. The tested implants included three conventional screws (AO, Olmed, Hansson), one screw with threads and a barb (Hybrid), and a pin with a hook (LIH).

Results: The Hansson screw provided higher maximum torque in low and medium density blocks when compared with the other implants (p < 0.0001) followed by LIH, Hybrid, Olmed, and AO. For high-density blocks there was no significant difference between Hansson and Hybrid screws, both with significantly higher torque than the other implants. The maximal pullout in low-density blocks differed significantly between all five implants with the Hansson screw providing the highest holding power. For medium and high-density blocks the conventional screws had significantly higher pullout resistance compared with the Hybrid and LIH.

Conclusion: The in vitro model used seemed to provide reproducible and clinically relevant results. There was a good correlation between material density and holding power for all implants. Screws inserted without predrilling provided higher maximal torque while maximal pull out load seemed less affected by predrilling being used or not.

股骨颈骨折假体设计和骨密度对最大扭矩和握持力的影响。
背景与目的:股骨颈内固定骨折移位是常见的问题。这项体外研究比较了五种不同种植体的最大扭矩和保持力。材料与方法:采用低、中、高密度合成多孔材料模拟松质骨。测试的植入物包括三个常规螺钉(AO, Olmed, Hansson),一个带螺纹和倒刺的螺钉(Hybrid)和一个带钩的销钉(LIH)。结果:与LIH、Hybrid、Olmed和AO等其他种植体相比,Hansson螺钉在低密度和中密度块上提供了更高的最大扭矩(p < 0.0001)。对于高密度块,Hansson螺钉和Hybrid螺钉之间没有显著差异,两者的扭矩都明显高于其他种植体。在所有五种种植体中,低密度块的最大拔出力有显著差异,Hansson螺钉提供最高的保持力。对于中等和高密度的砌块,常规螺钉与Hybrid和LIH相比具有明显更高的拉出阻力。结论:所建立的体外模型具有可重复性和临床相关性。所有种植体的材料密度与持力之间存在良好的相关性。未使用预钻的螺钉可提供更高的最大扭矩,而最大拔出载荷受是否使用预钻的影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信