Wound cell variation in closed surgical wounds as measured with two independent methods.

Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Pub Date : 2000-01-01
O T Pajulo, K K Lertola, K J Pulkki, H K Vuorio, S M Sivula, J A Viljanto
{"title":"Wound cell variation in closed surgical wounds as measured with two independent methods.","authors":"O T Pajulo,&nbsp;K K Lertola,&nbsp;K J Pulkki,&nbsp;H K Vuorio,&nbsp;S M Sivula,&nbsp;J A Viljanto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>It is not known, to what extent the observed cellular changes in healing surgical wounds are species-, individual- or site-specific or whether they depend on the research method used. The aim of this study was to compare two independent methods for harvesting wound cells from porcine wounds after two time intervals, and to assess individual changes of wound cell composition.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In a standardised wound model in six pigs, with eight dorsal skin incision wounds in each, the Cellstick device and the Wound Edge Contact (WEC) method were used to collect inflammatory cells from the same wounds at hour 6 or 24 post-surgery. The wound cells were stained by the May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) -method and counted differentially.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference was found between the 6 and 24 hour Cellstick specimen in the proportions of wound neutrophils (p = 0.007), lymphocytes (p = 0.02) and monocytes (p < 0.001). The differential counts of wound cells within each individual animal did not significantly differ from each other. Instead, a significant difference was found in the wound neutrophils (p = 0.001), lymphocytes (p = 0.04) and monocytes (p < 0.001) between the wounds of individual animals. The WEC method revealed the same significant differences in the wound cell proportions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Cellstick and the WEC method gave analogous results with equal variances from the incision wounds for up to at least 24 hours after injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":75495,"journal":{"name":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae","volume":"89 2","pages":"107-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: It is not known, to what extent the observed cellular changes in healing surgical wounds are species-, individual- or site-specific or whether they depend on the research method used. The aim of this study was to compare two independent methods for harvesting wound cells from porcine wounds after two time intervals, and to assess individual changes of wound cell composition.

Material and methods: In a standardised wound model in six pigs, with eight dorsal skin incision wounds in each, the Cellstick device and the Wound Edge Contact (WEC) method were used to collect inflammatory cells from the same wounds at hour 6 or 24 post-surgery. The wound cells were stained by the May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) -method and counted differentially.

Results: A significant difference was found between the 6 and 24 hour Cellstick specimen in the proportions of wound neutrophils (p = 0.007), lymphocytes (p = 0.02) and monocytes (p < 0.001). The differential counts of wound cells within each individual animal did not significantly differ from each other. Instead, a significant difference was found in the wound neutrophils (p = 0.001), lymphocytes (p = 0.04) and monocytes (p < 0.001) between the wounds of individual animals. The WEC method revealed the same significant differences in the wound cell proportions.

Conclusions: The Cellstick and the WEC method gave analogous results with equal variances from the incision wounds for up to at least 24 hours after injury.

用两种独立的方法测量闭合性手术创面的创面细胞变化。
背景和目的:目前尚不清楚,在手术伤口愈合过程中观察到的细胞变化在多大程度上是物种、个体或部位特异性的,或者它们是否取决于所使用的研究方法。本研究的目的是比较两种独立的方法在两个时间间隔后从猪伤口中收集伤口细胞,并评估伤口细胞组成的个体变化。材料和方法:在6只猪的标准化伤口模型中,每只猪有8个背侧皮肤切口伤口,在手术后6小时或24小时,使用细胞棒装置和伤口边缘接触(WEC)法收集同一伤口的炎症细胞。采用may - gr nwald- giemsa (MGG)染色法对创面细胞进行染色计数。结果:6、24 h细胞棒标本创面中性粒细胞比例(p = 0.007)、淋巴细胞比例(p = 0.02)、单核细胞比例(p < 0.001)差异有统计学意义。每只动物的伤口细胞计数差异无显著差异。不同动物创面间中性粒细胞(p = 0.001)、淋巴细胞(p = 0.04)和单核细胞(p < 0.001)差异有统计学意义。WEC方法在创面细胞比例上也显示出同样显著的差异。结论:细胞棒法和WEC法在伤口损伤后至少24小时内得到了相似的结果,差异相等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信