Quantitative evaluation of two methods of control of bilateral stimulated hand grasps in persons with tetraplegia.

T R Scott, J M Heasman, V A Vare, R Y Flynn, C R Gschwind, J W Middleton, S B Rutkowski
{"title":"Quantitative evaluation of two methods of control of bilateral stimulated hand grasps in persons with tetraplegia.","authors":"T R Scott,&nbsp;J M Heasman,&nbsp;V A Vare,&nbsp;R Y Flynn,&nbsp;C R Gschwind,&nbsp;J W Middleton,&nbsp;S B Rutkowski","doi":"10.1109/86.847827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electrical stimulation has been applied to the paralyzed muscles of both hands of two persons with tetraplegia using percutaneous and implantable electrodes. Two separate methods of user control were being investigated. The first monitored the myoelectric signals from the user's own sternocleidomastoid muscles and the second monitored wrist joint angle. These signals were used as commands to modify the stimulated grasps. The hands were instrumented to detect the degree of hand closure and grip force and the users matched these to specific target parameters using the controller during tracking tasks. Performance in these tracking tasks was measured quantitatively. Wrist control was found to be less sensitive to the direction of hand opening/closing required than the myoelectric control. The user's performance with the myoelectric control demonstrated sensitivity to the target size and the speed of hand movement in response to the command control. The wrist controller required less training than the myoelectric controller for users to become proficient in its use. Based on these results, the wrist controller and the myoelectric controller both provide successful control of bilateral hand grasp and release. Of the two controllers, the wrist controller is likely to provide the greater ease of use, although it is only available to the population of users with active wrist extension.</p>","PeriodicalId":79442,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","volume":"8 2","pages":"259-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/86.847827","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/86.847827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Electrical stimulation has been applied to the paralyzed muscles of both hands of two persons with tetraplegia using percutaneous and implantable electrodes. Two separate methods of user control were being investigated. The first monitored the myoelectric signals from the user's own sternocleidomastoid muscles and the second monitored wrist joint angle. These signals were used as commands to modify the stimulated grasps. The hands were instrumented to detect the degree of hand closure and grip force and the users matched these to specific target parameters using the controller during tracking tasks. Performance in these tracking tasks was measured quantitatively. Wrist control was found to be less sensitive to the direction of hand opening/closing required than the myoelectric control. The user's performance with the myoelectric control demonstrated sensitivity to the target size and the speed of hand movement in response to the command control. The wrist controller required less training than the myoelectric controller for users to become proficient in its use. Based on these results, the wrist controller and the myoelectric controller both provide successful control of bilateral hand grasp and release. Of the two controllers, the wrist controller is likely to provide the greater ease of use, although it is only available to the population of users with active wrist extension.

两种控制四肢瘫痪患者双侧刺激手抓握的方法的定量评价。
电刺激已经应用于两名四肢瘫痪的人的双手麻痹肌肉使用经皮和植入式电极。目前正在研究两种不同的用户控制方法。第一个监测使用者自身胸锁乳突肌的肌电信号,第二个监测手腕关节角度。这些信号被用作命令来修改受刺激的抓取。这些手被用来检测手的闭合程度和握力,用户在跟踪任务中使用控制器将这些与特定的目标参数相匹配。在这些跟踪任务中的表现是定量测量的。研究发现,与肌电控制相比,手腕控制对手打开/关闭的方向不那么敏感。用户的表现与肌电控制表明敏感性的目标大小和手的运动速度响应指令控制。对于用户来说,手腕控制器比肌电控制器需要更少的训练来熟练使用。基于这些结果,手腕控制器和肌电控制器都可以成功地控制双手的抓握和释放。在这两种控制器中,手腕控制器可能提供更大的易用性,尽管它只适用于手腕主动伸展的用户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信