Comparison of neonatal transient evoked otoacoustic emission responses recorded with linear and QuickScreen protocols.

S Hatzopoulos, M Tsakanikos, A Grzanka, J Ratynska, A Martini
{"title":"Comparison of neonatal transient evoked otoacoustic emission responses recorded with linear and QuickScreen protocols.","authors":"S Hatzopoulos,&nbsp;M Tsakanikos,&nbsp;A Grzanka,&nbsp;J Ratynska,&nbsp;A Martini","doi":"10.3109/00206090009073056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Linear and QuickScreen (non-linear) transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) protocols were compared in terms of standardized clinical parameters in order to define the protocol producing recordings with the highest signal quality. Neonatal responses (520) were obtained from three different screening sites. The linear recordings were evoked by 69 and 75-dB p.e. SPL clicks. All responses were post-windowed by a 3.5- to 12.5-ms window, chosen by time-frequency analysis as the segment representing 97.35 per cent (linear) and 95.6 per cent (quick) of the total cumulative spectral energy. Evidence from hearing loss cases and the high similarity between the profile contours of the QuickScreen and the linear normal recordings have strongly suggested that a linear response evoked by a 75-dB p.e. SPL stimulus and post-processed by a 3.5 to 12.5 window is free of stimulus artefacts. The data indicate that the 75-dB linear protocol produces higher signal to noise ratios at 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 kHz, higher wave reproducibility, and lower TEOAE noise values than the QuickScreen protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":75571,"journal":{"name":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","volume":"39 2","pages":"70-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00206090009073056","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00206090009073056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Linear and QuickScreen (non-linear) transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) protocols were compared in terms of standardized clinical parameters in order to define the protocol producing recordings with the highest signal quality. Neonatal responses (520) were obtained from three different screening sites. The linear recordings were evoked by 69 and 75-dB p.e. SPL clicks. All responses were post-windowed by a 3.5- to 12.5-ms window, chosen by time-frequency analysis as the segment representing 97.35 per cent (linear) and 95.6 per cent (quick) of the total cumulative spectral energy. Evidence from hearing loss cases and the high similarity between the profile contours of the QuickScreen and the linear normal recordings have strongly suggested that a linear response evoked by a 75-dB p.e. SPL stimulus and post-processed by a 3.5 to 12.5 window is free of stimulus artefacts. The data indicate that the 75-dB linear protocol produces higher signal to noise ratios at 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 kHz, higher wave reproducibility, and lower TEOAE noise values than the QuickScreen protocol.

新生儿瞬态诱发耳声发射反应的线性和快速屏幕记录的比较。
根据标准化临床参数对线性和快速屏幕(非线性)瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)方案进行比较,以确定产生最高信号质量录音的方案。新生儿反应(520例)来自三个不同的筛查点。69和75 db p.e SPL的咔哒声诱发线性记录。所有响应都经过3.5到12.5 ms的窗口后加窗,时间-频率分析选择为代表总累积光谱能量的97.35%(线性)和95.6%(快速)的部分。来自听力损失病例的证据以及快速屏幕的轮廓轮廓与线性正常记录之间的高度相似性强烈表明,由75 db p.e SPL刺激引起的线性响应并经过3.5至12.5窗的后处理是没有刺激伪影的。数据表明,与QuickScreen协议相比,75 db线性协议在2.0、3.0和4.0 kHz时具有更高的信噪比,更高的波再现性和更低的TEOAE噪声值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信