Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score predict the risk of extracapsular extension and the risk of failure following radiotherapy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Seminars in urologic oncology Pub Date : 2000-05-01
M Roach, A Chen, J Song, A Diaz, J Presti, P Carroll
{"title":"Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score predict the risk of extracapsular extension and the risk of failure following radiotherapy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.","authors":"M Roach,&nbsp;A Chen,&nbsp;J Song,&nbsp;A Diaz,&nbsp;J Presti,&nbsp;P Carroll","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a relatively simple equation for predicting the risk of extracapsular extension (ECE) based on the pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score (GS) in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Three hundred and seventy-four patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 1994 and 521 men undergoing definitive radiotherapy during a similar time period were eligible for this analysis. Surgically treated patients were considered eligible if the pathological stage, preoperative PSA, and GS were available. Among these patients, the median preoperative PSA was 8.1 ng/mL (range, 0 to 195 ng/mL), and the median preoperative GS was 6 (range, 2 to 10). The empirically derived equation tested was (1.5 x PSA + [GS - 3] x 10). For this equation, the range of calculated risk was limited to 0% to 100%. Using the empirically derived equation, patients with a low calculated risk (CR) of < or = 33% had an average calculated risk (ACR) of 21.9% and an observed incidence (OI) of ECE was 17.8%. Patients with a moderate CR of 34% to 66% had an ACR of 46.3%, and an OI of ECE was 46.7%. Patients with a CR of 67% to 100% had an ACR of 83.7% and an OI of ECE of 66.7%. Of the 21 patients who had a PSA < or = 4 and a GS < or = 4, only 1 patient (4.8%) was found to have ECE. Men with an estimated risk of ECE of <33%, 33% to 67%, and >67% had a 4-year risk of biochemical failure following radiotherapy of 29%, 56%, and 78% (P < .00001). This empirically derived data appears to be reasonably accurate at estimating the incidence of ECE in patients with at low or intermediate risk before surgery. The risk of biochemical failure following radiotherapy also correlated the risk of ECE. Future staging systems for prostate cancer should use similar approach for defining risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":79436,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in urologic oncology","volume":"18 2","pages":"108-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in urologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a relatively simple equation for predicting the risk of extracapsular extension (ECE) based on the pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score (GS) in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Three hundred and seventy-four patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 1994 and 521 men undergoing definitive radiotherapy during a similar time period were eligible for this analysis. Surgically treated patients were considered eligible if the pathological stage, preoperative PSA, and GS were available. Among these patients, the median preoperative PSA was 8.1 ng/mL (range, 0 to 195 ng/mL), and the median preoperative GS was 6 (range, 2 to 10). The empirically derived equation tested was (1.5 x PSA + [GS - 3] x 10). For this equation, the range of calculated risk was limited to 0% to 100%. Using the empirically derived equation, patients with a low calculated risk (CR) of < or = 33% had an average calculated risk (ACR) of 21.9% and an observed incidence (OI) of ECE was 17.8%. Patients with a moderate CR of 34% to 66% had an ACR of 46.3%, and an OI of ECE was 46.7%. Patients with a CR of 67% to 100% had an ACR of 83.7% and an OI of ECE of 66.7%. Of the 21 patients who had a PSA < or = 4 and a GS < or = 4, only 1 patient (4.8%) was found to have ECE. Men with an estimated risk of ECE of <33%, 33% to 67%, and >67% had a 4-year risk of biochemical failure following radiotherapy of 29%, 56%, and 78% (P < .00001). This empirically derived data appears to be reasonably accurate at estimating the incidence of ECE in patients with at low or intermediate risk before surgery. The risk of biochemical failure following radiotherapy also correlated the risk of ECE. Future staging systems for prostate cancer should use similar approach for defining risk groups.

前列腺特异性抗原预处理和Gleason评分可预测临床上局限性前列腺癌患者囊外延伸风险和放疗失败风险。
本研究的目的是评估基于预处理前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和Gleason评分(GS)的相对简单的公式在临床上局限性前列腺癌患者中预测囊外延伸(ECE)风险的应用。在1988年至1994年期间接受根治性前列腺切除术的374名患者和在类似时期接受明确放疗的521名男性符合此分析。如果有病理分期、术前PSA和GS,手术治疗的患者被认为是合格的。在这些患者中,术前中位PSA为8.1 ng/mL(范围0 ~ 195 ng/mL),术前中位GS为6(范围2 ~ 10)。检验的经验推导方程为(1.5 × PSA + [GS - 3] × 10)。对于这个方程,计算风险的范围被限制在0%到100%。根据经验推导的公式,计算风险(CR) <或= 33%的低患者的平均计算风险(ACR)为21.9%,ECE的观察发生率(OI)为17.8%。中度CR为34%至66%的患者,ACR为46.3%,ECE成骨不全为46.7%。CR为67% ~ 100%的患者,ACR为83.7%,ECE OI为66.7%。在PSA < or = 4和GS < or = 4的21例患者中,只有1例(4.8%)发现有ECE。估计ECE风险为67%的男性放射治疗后4年生化失败风险分别为29%、56%和78% (P < 0.001)。这一经验性数据在估计手术前低或中等风险患者的ECE发生率方面似乎是相当准确的。放射治疗后生化失败的风险也与ECE的风险相关。未来的前列腺癌分期系统应该使用类似的方法来确定风险群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信