Percutaneous transmyocardial laser revascularization: overview of US clinical trials.

R Kornowski, S Fuchs, M B Leon
{"title":"Percutaneous transmyocardial laser revascularization: overview of US clinical trials.","authors":"R Kornowski,&nbsp;S Fuchs,&nbsp;M B Leon","doi":"10.1006/siic.2000.0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data from four surgical trials of laser transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) show pain reductions of at least two classes occurred among 25-76% of patients, significantly greater than with optimal medical therapy. The safety and feasibility of percutaneous TMR (PTMR) was proved in multiple uncontrolled registry studies. With PTMR in two randomized trials enrolling about 550 patients, improvements were found among 45% and 66% of patients as compared with 13% for best medical therapy. Other encouraging observations included significant improvements in exercise time (85 and 100 seconds) as compared with minimal or negative results for medical therapy, consistent overall exercise time improvements for PTMR, and overall patient perceptions of anginal stability and global health. Peri-procedural mortality is low and ranged from 0% to 0.6%. Some skepticism remains about the procedures, arising from failure in most cases to show improvements with SPECT imaging and lack of conclusive insights into the mechanism of action. A randomized 'blinded' study is underway to establish a definitive therapeutic value for catheter-based TMR. Nonetheless, preliminary clinical data seem promising for catheter-based TMR for obtaining symptomatic improvement in patients with chronic refractory ischemic coronary syndromes.</p>","PeriodicalId":79534,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in interventional cardiology : SIIC","volume":"5 2","pages":"97-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in interventional cardiology : SIIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1006/siic.2000.0124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Data from four surgical trials of laser transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) show pain reductions of at least two classes occurred among 25-76% of patients, significantly greater than with optimal medical therapy. The safety and feasibility of percutaneous TMR (PTMR) was proved in multiple uncontrolled registry studies. With PTMR in two randomized trials enrolling about 550 patients, improvements were found among 45% and 66% of patients as compared with 13% for best medical therapy. Other encouraging observations included significant improvements in exercise time (85 and 100 seconds) as compared with minimal or negative results for medical therapy, consistent overall exercise time improvements for PTMR, and overall patient perceptions of anginal stability and global health. Peri-procedural mortality is low and ranged from 0% to 0.6%. Some skepticism remains about the procedures, arising from failure in most cases to show improvements with SPECT imaging and lack of conclusive insights into the mechanism of action. A randomized 'blinded' study is underway to establish a definitive therapeutic value for catheter-based TMR. Nonetheless, preliminary clinical data seem promising for catheter-based TMR for obtaining symptomatic improvement in patients with chronic refractory ischemic coronary syndromes.

经皮心肌激光血运重建术:美国临床试验综述。
来自四项激光经心肌血管重建术(TMR)手术试验的数据显示,25-76%的患者至少减轻了两类疼痛,显著高于最佳药物治疗。经皮TMR (PTMR)的安全性和可行性在多个非对照注册研究中得到证实。在两项随机试验中,约有550名患者接受PTMR治疗,45%和66%的患者得到改善,而采用最佳药物治疗的患者只有13%。其他令人鼓舞的观察结果包括:与药物治疗相比,运动时间(85秒和100秒)显著改善,PTMR总体运动时间持续改善,以及患者对心绞痛稳定性和整体健康状况的总体感知。术中死亡率低,范围为0%至0.6%。由于在大多数情况下SPECT成像不能显示改善,以及缺乏对作用机制的结论性见解,对该方法仍有一些怀疑。一项随机“盲法”研究正在进行中,以确定导管TMR的确切治疗价值。尽管如此,初步的临床数据似乎表明,基于导管的TMR可以改善慢性难治性缺血性冠状动脉综合征患者的症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书