[Stent in protected and non-protected left main coronary artery: results and short-term follow-up].

J Farell Campa, J A Palomo Villada, A Abundes Velasco, M Ledesma Velasco
{"title":"[Stent in protected and non-protected left main coronary artery: results and short-term follow-up].","authors":"J Farell Campa,&nbsp;J A Palomo Villada,&nbsp;A Abundes Velasco,&nbsp;M Ledesma Velasco","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>We examined the immediate and short-term outcomes after stenting protected and unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenoses, in patients with normal ventricular function. Left main coronary artery disease is regarded as an absolute contraindication for coronary angioplasty, because it has been associated with high procedural morbidity and poor mid-term results. Between february 1995 and february 1999, 596 procedures were performed in 468 patients. Ten patients who had disease involving the left main coronary artery were included. They were not candidates for coronary surgery. The post-stent antithrombotic regimens were aspirin and ticlopidine. The procedural success rate was 100% without episodes of subacute thrombosis. Three to six months follow-up angiography was performed in all, restenosis occurred only in two patients, there were two repeat PTCA (20%) and there were no deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stenting of unprotected and protected left main coronary artery stenoses may be a safe and effective alternative to surgery in carefully selected patients with normal left ventricular function. The results of our study suggests that when patients have prohibitive surgical risks, elective LMCA angioplasty and/or stenting maybe undertaken with a high procedural success rate as an effective alternative to CABG in carefully selected patients. Further studies in larger patient populations are needed to assess late outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":75556,"journal":{"name":"Archivos del Instituto de Cardiologia de Mexico","volume":"70 1","pages":"38-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos del Instituto de Cardiologia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: We examined the immediate and short-term outcomes after stenting protected and unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenoses, in patients with normal ventricular function. Left main coronary artery disease is regarded as an absolute contraindication for coronary angioplasty, because it has been associated with high procedural morbidity and poor mid-term results. Between february 1995 and february 1999, 596 procedures were performed in 468 patients. Ten patients who had disease involving the left main coronary artery were included. They were not candidates for coronary surgery. The post-stent antithrombotic regimens were aspirin and ticlopidine. The procedural success rate was 100% without episodes of subacute thrombosis. Three to six months follow-up angiography was performed in all, restenosis occurred only in two patients, there were two repeat PTCA (20%) and there were no deaths.

Conclusions: Stenting of unprotected and protected left main coronary artery stenoses may be a safe and effective alternative to surgery in carefully selected patients with normal left ventricular function. The results of our study suggests that when patients have prohibitive surgical risks, elective LMCA angioplasty and/or stenting maybe undertaken with a high procedural success rate as an effective alternative to CABG in carefully selected patients. Further studies in larger patient populations are needed to assess late outcome.

[保护和非保护左冠状动脉支架:结果和短期随访]。
未标记:我们检查了在心室功能正常的患者中,受保护和未受保护的左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)狭窄接受支架植入术后的即时和短期结果。冠状动脉左主干疾病被认为是冠状动脉成形术的绝对禁忌症,因为它与高程序性发病率和较差的中期结果有关。1995年2月至1999年2月期间,对468名患者进行了596次手术。10例患者的疾病累及左冠状动脉主干。他们不适合做冠状动脉手术。支架后抗血栓治疗方案为阿司匹林和噻氯匹定。手术成功率100%,无亚急性血栓形成。所有患者均随访3 ~ 6个月进行血管造影,仅2例发生再狭窄,2例重复PTCA(20%),无死亡。结论:在精心挑选的左心室功能正常的患者中,无保护和有保护的左冠状动脉主干狭窄支架术可能是一种安全有效的手术替代方法。我们的研究结果表明,当患者有手术风险时,选择性LMCA血管成形术和/或支架植入术可以作为一种有效的替代CABG的方法,在精心挑选的患者中进行,手术成功率高。需要在更大的患者群体中进行进一步的研究来评估晚期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信