Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy Before Radical Prostatectomy: Update on the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Trials.

Molecular urology Pub Date : 1999-01-01
Fair, Rabbani, Bastar, Betancourt
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy Before Radical Prostatectomy: Update on the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Trials.","authors":"Fair,&nbsp;Rabbani,&nbsp;Bastar,&nbsp;Betancourt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report here the latest follow-up of the Phase II and III trials evaluating pathologic results and relapse-free survival, as judged by serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), in patients with localized prostate cancer who had radical prostatectomy performed at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Center (MSKCC) either with or without neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT). Pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND), radical prostatectomy, or both with or without NHT was performed in 141 patients enrolled in a Phase II trial comparing patients receiving NHT with concurrent controls and 140 patients in a randomized Phase III trial. In the Phase II study, there was a significant difference in the pathologic results, with only 35 (49%) of the 72 patients in the control group having organ-confined margin-negative disease compared with 48 (70%) of the 69 patients in the NHT arm (P = 0.0057; chi(2) test). With a median follow-up of 57 months, there was no significant difference in the PSA relapse rates in the two arms (P = 0.92; log-rank test). In the Phase III study, 39 (59%) of the 66 patients in the control arm had organ-confined margin-negative disease compared with 52 (70%) of the 74 patients in the NHT arm (P = 0.17; chi(2) test). However, the positive-margin rate was significantly lower in the NHT arm (19%) than in the control arm (37%) (P = 0.023; chi(2) test). With a median follow-up of 35 months, there was no significant difference in the PSA relapse rates in the two arms (P = 0.73; log-rank test). Thus, although NHT improves the pathologic results, further follow-up is necessary to determine if this marked reduction in the positive-margin rate will translate into improved disease-free survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":80296,"journal":{"name":"Molecular urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We report here the latest follow-up of the Phase II and III trials evaluating pathologic results and relapse-free survival, as judged by serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), in patients with localized prostate cancer who had radical prostatectomy performed at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Center (MSKCC) either with or without neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT). Pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND), radical prostatectomy, or both with or without NHT was performed in 141 patients enrolled in a Phase II trial comparing patients receiving NHT with concurrent controls and 140 patients in a randomized Phase III trial. In the Phase II study, there was a significant difference in the pathologic results, with only 35 (49%) of the 72 patients in the control group having organ-confined margin-negative disease compared with 48 (70%) of the 69 patients in the NHT arm (P = 0.0057; chi(2) test). With a median follow-up of 57 months, there was no significant difference in the PSA relapse rates in the two arms (P = 0.92; log-rank test). In the Phase III study, 39 (59%) of the 66 patients in the control arm had organ-confined margin-negative disease compared with 52 (70%) of the 74 patients in the NHT arm (P = 0.17; chi(2) test). However, the positive-margin rate was significantly lower in the NHT arm (19%) than in the control arm (37%) (P = 0.023; chi(2) test). With a median follow-up of 35 months, there was no significant difference in the PSA relapse rates in the two arms (P = 0.73; log-rank test). Thus, although NHT improves the pathologic results, further follow-up is necessary to determine if this marked reduction in the positive-margin rate will translate into improved disease-free survival.

根治性前列腺切除术前的新辅助激素治疗:斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心纪念试验的最新进展。
我们在此报告最新的II期和III期临床随访,评估在纪念斯隆-凯特琳中心(MSKCC)接受根治性前列腺切除术的局限性前列腺癌患者的病理结果和无复发生存期,通过血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)来判断,无论是否接受新辅助激素治疗(NHT)。盆腔淋巴结切除术(PLND),根治性前列腺切除术,或合并或不合并NHT的两种手术,在141名II期试验患者中进行,比较同时接受NHT的患者和140名随机III期试验患者。在II期研究中,病理结果有显著差异,对照组72例患者中只有35例(49%)患有器官局限性边缘阴性疾病,而NHT组69例患者中有48例(70%)(P = 0.0057;气(2)测试)。中位随访57个月,两组患者PSA复发率无显著差异(P = 0.92;生存率较)。在III期研究中,对照组66例患者中有39例(59%)患有器官局限性边缘阴性疾病,而NHT组74例患者中有52例(70%)患有器官局限性边缘阴性疾病(P = 0.17;气(2)测试)。然而,NHT组的阳性边缘率(19%)明显低于对照组(37%)(P = 0.023;气(2)测试)。中位随访时间为35个月,两组患者PSA复发率无显著差异(P = 0.73;生存率较)。因此,尽管NHT改善了病理结果,但需要进一步的随访来确定这种阳性边缘率的显著降低是否会转化为无病生存率的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信