The quality of general dental care: public and users' perceptions.

M Calnan, M Dickinson, G Manley
{"title":"The quality of general dental care: public and users' perceptions.","authors":"M Calnan,&nbsp;M Dickinson,&nbsp;G Manley","doi":"10.1136/qshc.8.3.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systematic evidence about how the public and users perceive and experience the quality of general dental care is in short supply, particularly in light of the recent changes in the general dental service. The study reported here attempted to fill this gap.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the criteria the public and users adopt in evaluating the quality of general dental care, and to identify the extent and nature of perceived concerns with general dental care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Postal questionnaires were sent to random samples of adults living in an inner city area (I) and semi-rural area (R) in southern England. Fifty six per cent (1499) in area R and 48% (1388) in area I completed the questionnaire after four mailings. Follow up face-to-face interviews were done with a purposive subsample (n = 50) of responders from the postal survey.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Public/user views about quality of dental care were measured through groups of questions about the importance of and satisfaction with different aspects of dental care (access/availability including cost; facilities; technical skills; and interpersonal care) and a scale (Dentsat) measuring general satisfaction was constructed from questions on different aspects of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evaluation of quality of general dental care from the users' point of view hinges on perceived technical skills, particularly pain management. Major dissatisfaction stems from concerns about costs of dental care and privatisation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The criteria adopted by the public/users to assess general dental care are similar to other areas of health care, apart from the priority placed on technical skills and pain management. However, the major source of decline in satisfaction with the quality of general dental care is the barrier to access created by the rising cost of dental care and the increasing involvement of dentists in private practice. This evidence suggests that the public and users find the drift towards private practice and away from NHS practice a major source of concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":20773,"journal":{"name":"Quality in health care : QHC","volume":"8 3","pages":"149-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/qshc.8.3.149","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in health care : QHC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.8.3.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Background: Systematic evidence about how the public and users perceive and experience the quality of general dental care is in short supply, particularly in light of the recent changes in the general dental service. The study reported here attempted to fill this gap.

Objectives: To identify the criteria the public and users adopt in evaluating the quality of general dental care, and to identify the extent and nature of perceived concerns with general dental care.

Design: Postal questionnaires were sent to random samples of adults living in an inner city area (I) and semi-rural area (R) in southern England. Fifty six per cent (1499) in area R and 48% (1388) in area I completed the questionnaire after four mailings. Follow up face-to-face interviews were done with a purposive subsample (n = 50) of responders from the postal survey.

Main measures: Public/user views about quality of dental care were measured through groups of questions about the importance of and satisfaction with different aspects of dental care (access/availability including cost; facilities; technical skills; and interpersonal care) and a scale (Dentsat) measuring general satisfaction was constructed from questions on different aspects of care.

Results: Evaluation of quality of general dental care from the users' point of view hinges on perceived technical skills, particularly pain management. Major dissatisfaction stems from concerns about costs of dental care and privatisation.

Conclusions: The criteria adopted by the public/users to assess general dental care are similar to other areas of health care, apart from the priority placed on technical skills and pain management. However, the major source of decline in satisfaction with the quality of general dental care is the barrier to access created by the rising cost of dental care and the increasing involvement of dentists in private practice. This evidence suggests that the public and users find the drift towards private practice and away from NHS practice a major source of concern.

普通牙科保健的质量:公众和使用者的看法。
背景:关于公众和使用者如何感知和体验普通牙科护理质量的系统证据缺乏,特别是考虑到最近普通牙科服务的变化。本文报道的研究试图填补这一空白。目的:确定公众和使用者在评估普通牙科保健质量时采用的标准,并确定对普通牙科保健的关注程度和性质。设计:邮寄调查问卷随机发送给居住在英格兰南部内城地区(I)和半农村地区(R)的成年人。区域R的56%(1499)和区域I的48%(1388)在四次邮寄后完成了问卷。后续面对面访谈是通过邮政调查中有目的的子样本(n = 50)进行的。主要措施:公众/使用者对牙科保健质量的看法通过对牙科保健不同方面的重要性和满意度的问题组来衡量(可及性/可获得性,包括费用;设施;技术技能;和人际关怀)和一个测量总体满意度的量表(Dentsat)是由护理的不同方面的问题构建的。结果:从用户的角度评价一般牙科保健的质量取决于感知的技术技能,特别是疼痛管理。主要的不满来自对牙科保健费用和私有化的担忧。结论:除了优先重视技术技能和疼痛管理之外,公众/用户评估普通牙科保健所采用的标准与其他保健领域类似。然而,对一般牙科护理质量满意度下降的主要原因是牙科护理费用上升和牙医越来越多地参与私人执业所造成的障碍。这一证据表明,公众和用户发现向私人执业和远离NHS实践的漂移是一个主要的担忧来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信