COX-2 inhibitors and dental pain control.

A H Jeske
{"title":"COX-2 inhibitors and dental pain control.","authors":"A H Jeske","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Celecoxib (CELEBREX) and rofecoxib (VIOXX) appear to offer the following advantages: reduced incidence of gastric ulceration during long-term administration; little or no effect on platelet aggregation; longer clinical duration of action than aspirin, acetaminophen and ibuprofen. However, in the context of the management of dental pain and inflammation, the following points and disadvantages should be considered: no greater effectiveness than conventional NSAIDs (e.g., ibuprofen) for dental pain; greater cost than conventional NSAIDs (especially those available in generic forms); not available over-the-counter; possible inadequate duration of action for postoperative dental pain (see references 6 and 7); similar contraindications and drug interactions to less expensive, equally effective conventional non-selective NSAIDs. At this time, celebrex and rofecoxib cannot be recommended over conventional, non-selective NSAIDs as first-choice drugs for pain and inflammation in dentistry. Practitioners are cautioned against selecting any new drug based on \"clinical trials of one\", in which both the dentist and the patient know the drug being prescribed, (as opposed to double-blind studies), usually in the context of considerable \"hype\" about the drug (based on comments about the fact that the agent being tried is \"new\") and strong placebo reinforcement based on the dentist's enthusiasm for the new product, which does not usually accompany the prescription of older, routinely prescribed drugs. Finally, such \"clinical trials of one\" invariably involve close follow-up about the outcome of the treatment, which is usually not done with more common, older drugs, and which only introduces further bias into the interpretation of the effectiveness of the drug by both the patient and the dentist. Anaglesic drugs should be selected on the basis of controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trials which utilize a reasonable, dentally-related pain model. The older NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen, naproxen, diflunisal and others, remain first-choice drugs for the treatment of mild-to-moderate pain in dentistry in patients lacking the contraindications for such drugs. As proposed by this author several years ago, the major contraindications to NSAIDs can be remembered by the \"SAAB Rule\", an acronym which stands for \"Stomach problems\", Aspirin Allergy\" and \"Bleeding problems\", in addition to pregnancy and hepatic/renal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":77430,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Greater Houston Dental Society","volume":"71 4","pages":"39-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Greater Houston Dental Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Celecoxib (CELEBREX) and rofecoxib (VIOXX) appear to offer the following advantages: reduced incidence of gastric ulceration during long-term administration; little or no effect on platelet aggregation; longer clinical duration of action than aspirin, acetaminophen and ibuprofen. However, in the context of the management of dental pain and inflammation, the following points and disadvantages should be considered: no greater effectiveness than conventional NSAIDs (e.g., ibuprofen) for dental pain; greater cost than conventional NSAIDs (especially those available in generic forms); not available over-the-counter; possible inadequate duration of action for postoperative dental pain (see references 6 and 7); similar contraindications and drug interactions to less expensive, equally effective conventional non-selective NSAIDs. At this time, celebrex and rofecoxib cannot be recommended over conventional, non-selective NSAIDs as first-choice drugs for pain and inflammation in dentistry. Practitioners are cautioned against selecting any new drug based on "clinical trials of one", in which both the dentist and the patient know the drug being prescribed, (as opposed to double-blind studies), usually in the context of considerable "hype" about the drug (based on comments about the fact that the agent being tried is "new") and strong placebo reinforcement based on the dentist's enthusiasm for the new product, which does not usually accompany the prescription of older, routinely prescribed drugs. Finally, such "clinical trials of one" invariably involve close follow-up about the outcome of the treatment, which is usually not done with more common, older drugs, and which only introduces further bias into the interpretation of the effectiveness of the drug by both the patient and the dentist. Anaglesic drugs should be selected on the basis of controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trials which utilize a reasonable, dentally-related pain model. The older NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen, naproxen, diflunisal and others, remain first-choice drugs for the treatment of mild-to-moderate pain in dentistry in patients lacking the contraindications for such drugs. As proposed by this author several years ago, the major contraindications to NSAIDs can be remembered by the "SAAB Rule", an acronym which stands for "Stomach problems", Aspirin Allergy" and "Bleeding problems", in addition to pregnancy and hepatic/renal disease.

COX-2抑制剂与牙痛控制。
塞来昔布(CELEBREX)和罗非昔布(VIOXX)似乎具有以下优势:在长期给药期间减少胃溃疡的发生率;对血小板聚集作用小或无影响;比阿司匹林、对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬的临床作用持续时间更长。然而,在治疗牙痛和炎症方面,应考虑到以下几点和缺点:对牙痛的治疗效果并不比传统的非甾体抗炎药(如布洛芬)更好;比传统的非甾体抗炎药(尤其是那些通用形式的非甾体抗炎药)成本更高;非处方;治疗术后牙痛的时间可能不足(见参考文献6和7);类似的禁忌症和药物相互作用更便宜,同样有效的传统非选择性非甾体抗炎药。此时,西乐brex和罗非昔布不能被推荐为常规的非选择性非甾体抗炎药,作为治疗牙科疼痛和炎症的首选药物。从业人员被告诫不要选择任何基于“单一临床试验”的新药,在这种情况下,牙医和病人都知道所开的药物(与双盲研究相反),通常是在对药物进行大量“炒作”的背景下(基于对正在试用的药物是“新”这一事实的评论),以及基于牙医对新产品的热情而产生的强有力的安慰剂强化,这种热情通常不会伴随旧的处方。常规处方药物。最后,这种“一个人的临床试验”总是涉及对治疗结果的密切跟踪,这通常不是用更常见的、更老的药物做的,这只会给病人和牙医对药物有效性的解释带来进一步的偏见。止痛药物的选择应基于对照、双盲、随机临床试验,并利用合理的牙齿相关疼痛模型。较老的非甾体抗炎药,如布洛芬、萘普生、迪氟尼拉等,仍然是治疗无此类药物禁忌症的患者轻度至中度牙痛的首选药物。正如作者几年前提出的,除了妊娠和肝脏/肾脏疾病外,非甾体抗炎药的主要禁忌症可以通过“SAAB规则”来记住,“SAAB规则”是“胃部问题”、“阿司匹林过敏”和“出血问题”的缩写。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信