Has the well run dry? Priming the diversity pump in PhD programs.

D E Wilson, J Balotin
{"title":"Has the well run dry? Priming the diversity pump in PhD programs.","authors":"D E Wilson,&nbsp;J Balotin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>America has always described itself as a melting pot of people and cultures. Perhaps it has become more of a \"boiling pot\" as assaults against affirmative action and charges of racism run rampant. Underrepresented minorities in the United States remain well below the national average with regard to education, employment, and health status. While today these minorities make up nearly 25% of the US population, historically they continue to be underrepresented in the medical and research professions. Some progress has been made during the last several decades, but it has stalled. And there is reason to believe that we are facing potentially rapid reversals of what has been painfully achieved. There is a significant pipeline problem in the production of minority doctorate recipients in America today. A review of a cohort of 17-year-old white and black students using a national longitudinal survey of the high school class of 1980 determined that 28% of white students graduated from college, compared with only 11% of black students--a 60% difference. Less than 1% of this original cohort of black students went on to earn science degrees. Doctoral programs now increasingly compete for the same small group of academically qualified minority students. The only long-term solution is to improve the educational opportunities starting from the early stages of the educational pipeline, beginning in elementary school. High school is too late. This process is complicated and will be costly. Pipeline initiatives will demand creativity, flexibility, and a commitment from all of us. We must increase the motivation and preparation of minority students regarding careers in science, engineering, and health care. We in academic health centers must play a key role in strengthening science education and in changing our behavior. We need to address the reasons why more than half of black students who enter college fail to graduate, why there is so little interest in science, and why minority students are not better prepared in science while they are in secondary school. And we need to address these issues now.</p>","PeriodicalId":77227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians : the official publication of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians : the official publication of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

America has always described itself as a melting pot of people and cultures. Perhaps it has become more of a "boiling pot" as assaults against affirmative action and charges of racism run rampant. Underrepresented minorities in the United States remain well below the national average with regard to education, employment, and health status. While today these minorities make up nearly 25% of the US population, historically they continue to be underrepresented in the medical and research professions. Some progress has been made during the last several decades, but it has stalled. And there is reason to believe that we are facing potentially rapid reversals of what has been painfully achieved. There is a significant pipeline problem in the production of minority doctorate recipients in America today. A review of a cohort of 17-year-old white and black students using a national longitudinal survey of the high school class of 1980 determined that 28% of white students graduated from college, compared with only 11% of black students--a 60% difference. Less than 1% of this original cohort of black students went on to earn science degrees. Doctoral programs now increasingly compete for the same small group of academically qualified minority students. The only long-term solution is to improve the educational opportunities starting from the early stages of the educational pipeline, beginning in elementary school. High school is too late. This process is complicated and will be costly. Pipeline initiatives will demand creativity, flexibility, and a commitment from all of us. We must increase the motivation and preparation of minority students regarding careers in science, engineering, and health care. We in academic health centers must play a key role in strengthening science education and in changing our behavior. We need to address the reasons why more than half of black students who enter college fail to graduate, why there is so little interest in science, and why minority students are not better prepared in science while they are in secondary school. And we need to address these issues now.

井干了吗?为博士项目注入多样性泵。
美国一直把自己描述为一个人民和文化的大熔炉。也许随着对平权法案的攻击和对种族主义的指控猖獗,它更像是一个“沸腾的锅”。在美国,代表性不足的少数民族在教育、就业和健康状况方面仍远低于全国平均水平。虽然今天这些少数民族占美国人口的近25%,但从历史上看,他们在医疗和研究专业中的代表性仍然不足。在过去的几十年里已经取得了一些进展,但它已经停滞不前。我们有理由相信,我们正面临着痛苦取得的成果可能迅速逆转的局面。如今,在美国培养少数族裔博士学位的过程中,存在着一个严重的输送问题。对一组17岁的白人和黑人学生的回顾,使用了一项针对1980年高中班级的全国性纵向调查,发现28%的白人学生从大学毕业,而黑人学生只有11%——差距为60%。在这批最初的黑人学生中,只有不到1%的人获得了科学学位。博士课程现在越来越多地争夺同样一小群学术上合格的少数民族学生。唯一的长期解决办法是从小学开始,从教育管道的早期阶段开始改善教育机会。上高中太晚了。这个过程很复杂,而且代价高昂。管道计划将需要我们所有人的创造力、灵活性和承诺。我们必须增加少数族裔学生在科学、工程和卫生保健领域的就业动力和准备。我们在学术保健中心必须在加强科学教育和改变我们的行为方面发挥关键作用。我们需要解决为什么半数以上进入大学的黑人学生没能毕业,为什么他们对科学兴趣如此之少,为什么少数族裔学生在中学时没有在科学方面做更好的准备。我们现在就需要解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信