[Rh (D) alloimmunization and pregnancy. Analysis of the causes after prophylaxis introduction].

Sangre Pub Date : 1999-12-01
J R Furundarena, A Ibisate, Y Burguete, E González de Langarica, N González, R Urquiza, A Mendizabal, N Hernando, C Pérez Clausell
{"title":"[Rh (D) alloimmunization and pregnancy. Analysis of the causes after prophylaxis introduction].","authors":"J R Furundarena,&nbsp;A Ibisate,&nbsp;Y Burguete,&nbsp;E González de Langarica,&nbsp;N González,&nbsp;R Urquiza,&nbsp;A Mendizabal,&nbsp;N Hernando,&nbsp;C Pérez Clausell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prenatal and postnatal prophylaxis of the Rh (D) haemolytic disease of the newborn have clearly reduced the number of cases but still there are alloimmunizations.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All cases detected in our Hospital in the last 24 years have been reviewed and possible causes analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 10,332 deliveries in Rh (D) negative women we have detected 114 anti-D in 86 women. In 74 women anti-D was the only antibody and in 12 there were more antibodies. Data were managed in 3-year periods and we see a progressive decrease in the incidence of alloimmunization with a minimum of 0.03 per 1000 pregnancies in the period 89-91 and a posterior progression to an incidence of 0.12 in the last 3-year period 95-97. The causes were: pregnancies before 1970 in 31, incorrect prophylaxis in 12, despite a correct prophylaxis in 6, previous pregnancies without complete information about the prophylaxis in 13, previous transfusion in 6, previous pregnancies or transfusion in 8 and indetermined in 10.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is desirable to reduce at minimum the number of Rh (D) alloimmunizations by strictly following the prophylaxis protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":76513,"journal":{"name":"Sangre","volume":"44 6","pages":"429-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangre","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Prenatal and postnatal prophylaxis of the Rh (D) haemolytic disease of the newborn have clearly reduced the number of cases but still there are alloimmunizations.

Patients and methods: All cases detected in our Hospital in the last 24 years have been reviewed and possible causes analyzed.

Results: From a total of 10,332 deliveries in Rh (D) negative women we have detected 114 anti-D in 86 women. In 74 women anti-D was the only antibody and in 12 there were more antibodies. Data were managed in 3-year periods and we see a progressive decrease in the incidence of alloimmunization with a minimum of 0.03 per 1000 pregnancies in the period 89-91 and a posterior progression to an incidence of 0.12 in the last 3-year period 95-97. The causes were: pregnancies before 1970 in 31, incorrect prophylaxis in 12, despite a correct prophylaxis in 6, previous pregnancies without complete information about the prophylaxis in 13, previous transfusion in 6, previous pregnancies or transfusion in 8 and indetermined in 10.

Conclusion: It is desirable to reduce at minimum the number of Rh (D) alloimmunizations by strictly following the prophylaxis protocols.

[Rh (D)异体免疫与妊娠。]预防用药后原因分析[j]。
目的:产前和产后预防新生儿Rh (D)溶血性疾病的病例数明显减少,但仍有异体免疫接种。患者和方法:回顾我院近24年来发现的所有病例,分析可能的原因。结果:在10332例Rh (D)阴性产妇中,86例检测到114例抗D。74名妇女中只有抗d抗体,12名妇女中有更多抗体。数据是在3年期间进行管理的,我们看到同种异体免疫的发生率逐渐下降,在89-91年期间,每1000例妊娠中至少有0.03例,在95-97年的最后3年期间,发生率向后发展到0.12例。原因是:1970年以前怀孕31例,不正确预防12例,尽管有正确的预防6例,以前怀孕没有完整的预防信息13例,以前输血6例,以前怀孕或输血8例,不确定10例。结论:应严格遵守预防方案,至少减少Rh (D)同种异体免疫接种的次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信