Experimental investigations of the use of cartilage in tympanic membrane reconstruction.

T Zahnert, K B Hüttenbrink, D Mürbe, M Bornitz
{"title":"Experimental investigations of the use of cartilage in tympanic membrane reconstruction.","authors":"T Zahnert,&nbsp;K B Hüttenbrink,&nbsp;D Mürbe,&nbsp;M Bornitz","doi":"10.1016/s0196-0709(00)80039-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporalis fascia, perichondrium, and cartilage are commonly used for reconstruction of the tympanic membrane in middle ear surgery. Cartilage grafts offer the advantage of higher mechanical stability, particularly in cases of chronic tubal dysfunction, adhesive processes, or total defects of the tympanic membrane, in contrast to fascia and perichondrium, which presumably offer better acoustic quality.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the acoustic transfer characteristics of cartilage of varying thickness and its mechanical deformation when exposed to fluctuations in atmospheric pressure.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ten pairs of cartilage specimens from the cavum conchae and the tragus were obtained from fresh human cadavers. Young's modulus was determined by mechanical tension tests and statistically evaluated using the t test. The acoustic transfer characteristics of an additional 10 specimens were measured by a laser Doppler Interferometer after stimulation with white noise in an external auditory canal--tympanic membrane model. Mechanical stability was determined by measuring displacement of the cartilage using static pressure loads of < or = 4 kPa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Young's modulus determinations for conchal and tragal cartilage were 3.4 N/mm2 and 2.8 N/mm2, respectively, but the difference was not significant. Acoustic testing showed a 5-dB higher vibration amplitude in the midfrequency range for conchal compared with tragal cartilage, but the difference was not significant. Reducing cartilage thickness led to an improvement of its acoustic transfer qualities, with a thickness < or = 500 microm resulting in an acceptable acoustic transfer loss compared with the tympanic membrane.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both conchal and tragal cartilage are useful for reconstruction of the tympanic membrane from the perspective of their acoustic properties. The acoustic transfer loss of cartilage can be reduced by decreasing its thickness. A thickness of 500 microm is regarded as a good compromise between sufficient mechanical stability and low acoustic transfer loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":76596,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of otology","volume":"21 3","pages":"322-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"211","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0709(00)80039-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 211

Abstract

Background: Temporalis fascia, perichondrium, and cartilage are commonly used for reconstruction of the tympanic membrane in middle ear surgery. Cartilage grafts offer the advantage of higher mechanical stability, particularly in cases of chronic tubal dysfunction, adhesive processes, or total defects of the tympanic membrane, in contrast to fascia and perichondrium, which presumably offer better acoustic quality.

Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the acoustic transfer characteristics of cartilage of varying thickness and its mechanical deformation when exposed to fluctuations in atmospheric pressure.

Method: Ten pairs of cartilage specimens from the cavum conchae and the tragus were obtained from fresh human cadavers. Young's modulus was determined by mechanical tension tests and statistically evaluated using the t test. The acoustic transfer characteristics of an additional 10 specimens were measured by a laser Doppler Interferometer after stimulation with white noise in an external auditory canal--tympanic membrane model. Mechanical stability was determined by measuring displacement of the cartilage using static pressure loads of < or = 4 kPa.

Results: Young's modulus determinations for conchal and tragal cartilage were 3.4 N/mm2 and 2.8 N/mm2, respectively, but the difference was not significant. Acoustic testing showed a 5-dB higher vibration amplitude in the midfrequency range for conchal compared with tragal cartilage, but the difference was not significant. Reducing cartilage thickness led to an improvement of its acoustic transfer qualities, with a thickness < or = 500 microm resulting in an acceptable acoustic transfer loss compared with the tympanic membrane.

Conclusion: Both conchal and tragal cartilage are useful for reconstruction of the tympanic membrane from the perspective of their acoustic properties. The acoustic transfer loss of cartilage can be reduced by decreasing its thickness. A thickness of 500 microm is regarded as a good compromise between sufficient mechanical stability and low acoustic transfer loss.

软骨在鼓膜重建中的实验研究。
背景:颞筋膜、软骨膜和软骨是中耳手术中常用的鼓膜重建材料。与筋膜和软骨膜相比,软骨移植具有更高的机械稳定性的优势,特别是在慢性输卵管功能障碍、粘连过程或鼓膜完全缺损的情况下,后者可能提供更好的声学质量。假设:本研究的目的是确定不同厚度软骨在大气压力波动下的声传递特性及其力学变形。方法:从新鲜人尸体上获取耳蜗腔和耳膜软骨标本10对。杨氏模量由机械张力试验确定,并使用t检验进行统计评估。在外耳道-鼓膜模型中,用激光多普勒干涉仪测量白噪声刺激后10个标本的声传递特性。通过测量软骨在<或= 4 kPa的静压载荷下的位移来确定机械稳定性。结果:耳甲软骨杨氏模量为3.4 N/mm2,耳甲软骨杨氏模量为2.8 N/mm2,差异无统计学意义。声学测试显示耳甲软骨中频振动幅值比耳甲软骨高5db,但差异不显著。减少软骨厚度导致其声传递质量的改善,与鼓膜相比,厚度<或= 500微米导致可接受的声传递损失。结论:从耳甲软骨和耳甲软骨的声学特性来看,耳甲软骨和耳甲软骨均可用于鼓膜重建。减少软骨的厚度可以减少软骨的声传递损失。500微米的厚度被认为是足够的机械稳定性和低声传递损失之间的一个很好的折衷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信