Haemodialysis in acute renal failure.

EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed.) Pub Date : 1999-07-01
A Taratufolo, M Manzi, F Pedulla, F De Bernardini, O Carofei, M R Alaimo, N Ugolini, P Galeotti
{"title":"Haemodialysis in acute renal failure.","authors":"A Taratufolo,&nbsp;M Manzi,&nbsp;F Pedulla,&nbsp;F De Bernardini,&nbsp;O Carofei,&nbsp;M R Alaimo,&nbsp;N Ugolini,&nbsp;P Galeotti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Haemodialysis in acute renal failure differs from chronic uraemia. We describe our clinical experience comparing tolerance to dialysis and dialysis efficacy of bicarbonate haemodialysis in comparison to haemofiltration. Both provide adequate treatment for ARF, Kt/v 0.6 +/- 0.1, URR 56% in bicarbonate haemodialysis compared to Kt/v 0.4 +/- 0.06, URR 60% in haemofiltration. Clinical outcome was the same in both groups, in particular the overall survival was satisfactory at about 70%. These results are likely to reflect close control of these patients by nursing staff committed to haemodialysis in acute renal failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":79589,"journal":{"name":"EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed.)","volume":"25 3","pages":"43-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDTNA/ERCA journal (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Haemodialysis in acute renal failure differs from chronic uraemia. We describe our clinical experience comparing tolerance to dialysis and dialysis efficacy of bicarbonate haemodialysis in comparison to haemofiltration. Both provide adequate treatment for ARF, Kt/v 0.6 +/- 0.1, URR 56% in bicarbonate haemodialysis compared to Kt/v 0.4 +/- 0.06, URR 60% in haemofiltration. Clinical outcome was the same in both groups, in particular the overall survival was satisfactory at about 70%. These results are likely to reflect close control of these patients by nursing staff committed to haemodialysis in acute renal failure.

血液透析在急性肾衰竭中的应用。
急性肾衰竭的血液透析不同于慢性尿毒症。我们描述了我们的临床经验,比较透析耐受性和透析效果的碳酸氢盐血液透析与血液过滤。两者都能提供足够的ARF治疗,Kt/v 0.6 +/- 0.1,碳酸氢盐血液透析的URR为56%,而Kt/v 0.4 +/- 0.06,血液过滤的URR为60%。两组临床结果相同,特别是总生存率约为70%,令人满意。这些结果可能反映了护理人员对急性肾功能衰竭患者进行血液透析的密切控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书