Stenosis quantification from post-stenotic signal loss in phase-contrast MRA datasets of flow phantoms and renal arteries.

J J Westenberg, R J van der Geest, M N Wasser, J Doornbos, P M Pattynama, A de Roos, J Vanderschoot, J H Reiber
{"title":"Stenosis quantification from post-stenotic signal loss in phase-contrast MRA datasets of flow phantoms and renal arteries.","authors":"J J Westenberg,&nbsp;R J van der Geest,&nbsp;M N Wasser,&nbsp;J Doornbos,&nbsp;P M Pattynama,&nbsp;A de Roos,&nbsp;J Vanderschoot,&nbsp;J H Reiber","doi":"10.1023/a:1006329032742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study a semi-automated and observer-independent algorithm for quantifying post-stenotic signal loss (PSL) in 3D phase-contrast (PC) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of patients with renal artery stenosis is presented. This algorithm was developed on MRA datasets of stenotic phantoms, which were included in a flow circuit with stationary flows. The length and the severity of the PSL (incorporating both length and degree of PSL) in the maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of MRA datasets were proposed for quantifying stenoses. The algorithm was tested in renal arteries of ten patients with renal artery stenosis and seven healthy volunteers. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in the patients and served as the gold standard. Stenosis severity showed better correlation with the severity of the PSL than with the length, both for in vitro as in vivo. Spearman correlation coefficients (rS) showed statistically significant correlations between the severity of the PSL and parameters determined by DSA, i.e. percent diameter stenosis (rS = 0.90). The length of the PSL showed no correlation with the diameter stenosis (rS = 0.37).</p>","PeriodicalId":77179,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiac imaging","volume":"15 6","pages":"483-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006329032742","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiac imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006329032742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In this study a semi-automated and observer-independent algorithm for quantifying post-stenotic signal loss (PSL) in 3D phase-contrast (PC) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of patients with renal artery stenosis is presented. This algorithm was developed on MRA datasets of stenotic phantoms, which were included in a flow circuit with stationary flows. The length and the severity of the PSL (incorporating both length and degree of PSL) in the maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of MRA datasets were proposed for quantifying stenoses. The algorithm was tested in renal arteries of ten patients with renal artery stenosis and seven healthy volunteers. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in the patients and served as the gold standard. Stenosis severity showed better correlation with the severity of the PSL than with the length, both for in vitro as in vivo. Spearman correlation coefficients (rS) showed statistically significant correlations between the severity of the PSL and parameters determined by DSA, i.e. percent diameter stenosis (rS = 0.90). The length of the PSL showed no correlation with the diameter stenosis (rS = 0.37).

血流幻影和肾动脉相对比MRA数据集中狭窄后信号丢失的狭窄量化。
在这项研究中,提出了一种半自动化和观察者无关的算法,用于量化肾动脉狭窄患者的三维相位对比(PC)磁共振血管造影(MRA)中的狭窄后信号损失(PSL)。该算法是在固定流的流动回路中包含狭窄幻影的MRA数据集上开发的。在MRA数据集的最大强度预测(MIPs)中,提出了PSL的长度和严重程度(包括PSL的长度和程度)来量化狭窄。该算法在10例肾动脉狭窄患者和7名健康志愿者的肾动脉中进行了测试。患者行数字减影血管造影(DSA)作为金标准。无论在体内还是体外,狭窄严重程度与PSL严重程度的相关性强于与长度的相关性。Spearman相关系数(rS)显示PSL的严重程度与DSA测定的参数(即直径狭窄百分比)之间具有统计学意义(rS = 0.90)。PSL长度与狭窄直径无相关性(rS = 0.37)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信