Lateral internal sphincterotomy together with haemorrhoidectomy for treatment of haemorrhoids: a randomised prospective study.

G Galizia, E Lieto, P Castellano, L Pelosio, V Imperatore, C Pigantelli
{"title":"Lateral internal sphincterotomy together with haemorrhoidectomy for treatment of haemorrhoids: a randomised prospective study.","authors":"G Galizia,&nbsp;E Lieto,&nbsp;P Castellano,&nbsp;L Pelosio,&nbsp;V Imperatore,&nbsp;C Pigantelli","doi":"10.1080/110241500750009320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate anorectal manometric findings in patients with haemorrhoids and to evaluate the clinical effects and physiological consequences of adding a lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) to haemorrhoidectomy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised prospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Teaching hospital, Naples.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>48 consecutive patients with prolapsed piles who had anorectal manometry; 10 healthy volunteers served as controls.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Resting and squeeze pressures, sphincter length and rectoanal inhibitory reflex were recorded. 6 patients were excluded because anal pressures were not raised, so 42 patients were randomised. 22 patients had haemorrhoidectomy plus LIS; and 20 had haemorrhoidectomy alone.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Morbidity, continence, and anorectal manometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sphincter anomalies were found in 87.5% (n = 42) of patients. Haemorrhoidectomy alone did not affect anal pressures, which returned to the normal ranges after sphincterotomy. Those who had LIS did better postoperatively than those who had did not. 4 patients who did not have a sphincterotomy developed anal strictures. No patient who had LIS developed incontinence of faeces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High anal pressures are common in patients with haemorrhoids suggesting that they may have a pathogenetic role; anorectal manometry is useful in the investigation of anal pressure patterns; and when indicated, lateral sphincterotomy avoids pain, urinary retention, and stenosis, and is safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":22411,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","volume":"166 3","pages":"223-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241500750009320","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Objective: To investigate anorectal manometric findings in patients with haemorrhoids and to evaluate the clinical effects and physiological consequences of adding a lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) to haemorrhoidectomy.

Design: Randomised prospective study.

Setting: Teaching hospital, Naples.

Patients: 48 consecutive patients with prolapsed piles who had anorectal manometry; 10 healthy volunteers served as controls.

Interventions: Resting and squeeze pressures, sphincter length and rectoanal inhibitory reflex were recorded. 6 patients were excluded because anal pressures were not raised, so 42 patients were randomised. 22 patients had haemorrhoidectomy plus LIS; and 20 had haemorrhoidectomy alone.

Main outcome measures: Morbidity, continence, and anorectal manometry.

Results: Sphincter anomalies were found in 87.5% (n = 42) of patients. Haemorrhoidectomy alone did not affect anal pressures, which returned to the normal ranges after sphincterotomy. Those who had LIS did better postoperatively than those who had did not. 4 patients who did not have a sphincterotomy developed anal strictures. No patient who had LIS developed incontinence of faeces.

Conclusions: High anal pressures are common in patients with haemorrhoids suggesting that they may have a pathogenetic role; anorectal manometry is useful in the investigation of anal pressure patterns; and when indicated, lateral sphincterotomy avoids pain, urinary retention, and stenosis, and is safe.

外侧内括约肌切开术联合痔疮切除术治疗痔疮:一项随机前瞻性研究。
目的:探讨痔患者肛门直肠测压的表现,评价痔切除术加侧内括约肌切开术(LIS)的临床效果和生理后果。设计:随机前瞻性研究。环境:那不勒斯教学医院。患者:连续48例行肛肠测压术的痔疮脱垂患者;10名健康志愿者作为对照。干预措施:记录静息和挤压压力、括约肌长度和直肠抑制反射。6例患者因肛门压力未升高而被排除,共42例患者被随机分组。痔切除术加LIS 22例;20人单独做了痔疮切除术。主要结局指标:发病率、尿失禁和肛肠测压。结果:87.5% (n = 42)的患者发现括约肌异常。单纯痔切除术不影响肛门压力,括约肌切开术后肛门压力恢复正常。患有LIS的患者术后表现优于未患有LIS的患者。4例未行括约肌切开术的患者出现肛门狭窄。没有LIS患者出现大便失禁。结论:高肛压在痔疮患者中很常见,提示其可能具有发病作用;肛门直肠测压法在肛门压力模式的调查中是有用的;当需要时,外侧括约肌切开术可以避免疼痛、尿潴留和狭窄,而且是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信