Comparison of the effects of acetylsalicylic acid, ticlopidine and cilostazol on primary hemostasis using a quantitative bleeding time test apparatus.

Haemostasis Pub Date : 1999-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000022512
Y Tamai, H Takami, R Nakahata, F Ono, A Munakata
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of acetylsalicylic acid, ticlopidine and cilostazol on primary hemostasis using a quantitative bleeding time test apparatus.","authors":"Y Tamai,&nbsp;H Takami,&nbsp;R Nakahata,&nbsp;F Ono,&nbsp;A Munakata","doi":"10.1159/000022512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined and compared the effects of aspirin (ASA), ticlopidine (TP) and cilostazol (CS) on bleeding time (BT) in 10 healthy adult male subjects using a newly developed quantitative bleeding time (QBT) test apparatus capable of simultaneously measuring total blood loss (Tv), maximum bleeding rate (Rmax), and bleeding pattern in addition to BT. All 3 drugs inhibited platelet aggregation response to ADP, collagen, epinephrine and arachidonic acid (p < 0.05), but not to ristocetin. Following oral administration of ASA (330 mg/day) or TP (300 mg/day) for 3 days, BT was significantly prolonged (mean BT increased from 359.3 to 646.0 s, p < 0.001, and from 323.3 to 528. 7 s, p < 0.01, respectively) and Tv was significantly increased (from 14.5 to 30.2 microl, p < 0.05, and from 12.5 to 19.2 microl, p < 0.01, respectively). Aspirin also increased Rmax (from 0.118 to 0. 159 microl/s, p < 0.05). The prolonged bleeding patterns after administration of ASA and TP were both type III, which has been reported to be less likely to lead to bleeding accidents. In contrast, none of these QBT parameters were altered by CS administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12910,"journal":{"name":"Haemostasis","volume":"29 5","pages":"269-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000022512","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000022512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

We examined and compared the effects of aspirin (ASA), ticlopidine (TP) and cilostazol (CS) on bleeding time (BT) in 10 healthy adult male subjects using a newly developed quantitative bleeding time (QBT) test apparatus capable of simultaneously measuring total blood loss (Tv), maximum bleeding rate (Rmax), and bleeding pattern in addition to BT. All 3 drugs inhibited platelet aggregation response to ADP, collagen, epinephrine and arachidonic acid (p < 0.05), but not to ristocetin. Following oral administration of ASA (330 mg/day) or TP (300 mg/day) for 3 days, BT was significantly prolonged (mean BT increased from 359.3 to 646.0 s, p < 0.001, and from 323.3 to 528. 7 s, p < 0.01, respectively) and Tv was significantly increased (from 14.5 to 30.2 microl, p < 0.05, and from 12.5 to 19.2 microl, p < 0.01, respectively). Aspirin also increased Rmax (from 0.118 to 0. 159 microl/s, p < 0.05). The prolonged bleeding patterns after administration of ASA and TP were both type III, which has been reported to be less likely to lead to bleeding accidents. In contrast, none of these QBT parameters were altered by CS administration.

应用定量出血时间测试仪比较乙酰水杨酸、噻氯匹定和西洛他唑对原发性止血的影响。
采用新开发的定量出血时间(QBT)试验装置,对10例健康成年男性受试者进行了阿司匹林(ASA)、噻氯匹定(TP)和西洛他唑(CS)对出血时间(BT)的影响进行了比较。该定量出血时间(QBT)试验装置可同时测量总出血量(Tv)、最大出血率(Rmax)和除BT外的出血类型,3种药物均可抑制ADP、胶原蛋白、肾上腺素和花生四烯酸的血小板聚集反应(p < 0.05),但对里斯托司汀没有作用。口服ASA (330 mg/d)或TP (300 mg/d) 3天后,BT显著延长(平均BT从359.3 s增加到646.0 s, p < 0.001),从323.3 s增加到528 s。7 s, p < 0.01)和Tv显著升高(分别从14.5 ~ 30.2 microl, p < 0.05和12.5 ~ 19.2 microl, p < 0.01)。阿司匹林也增加了Rmax(从0.118到0)。159微升/秒,p < 0.05)。ASA和TP治疗后出血时间延长均为III型,有报道称其不太可能导致出血事故。相比之下,这些QBT参数均未因服用CS而改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信