Outpatient satisfaction: validation of a French-language questionnaire: data quality and identification of associated factors.

J Labarère, P François, D Bertrand, J C Peyrin, C Robert, M Fourny
{"title":"Outpatient satisfaction: validation of a French-language questionnaire: data quality and identification of associated factors.","authors":"J Labarère,&nbsp;P François,&nbsp;D Bertrand,&nbsp;J C Peyrin,&nbsp;C Robert,&nbsp;M Fourny","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Following 1996 legislation requiring French hospitals to assess patient satisfaction, this study developed and validated a brief French-language multidimensional questionnaire designed to measure outpatient satisfaction with hospital visits and compared data quality for two patient-satisfaction survey methods.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Authors developed a 19-item questionnaire following a strict procedure (identification of dimensions to explore, formulation, and selection of items).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Validation data were obtained from patients of six outpatient clinics in a teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>586 consenting eligible patients were randomized to receive the questionnaire 2 weeks after their visit with one of two survey methods: a mailed self-administered questionnaire or a telephone interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate (79%) was not significantly different between the two survey methods. The risk of having one or more missing values was higher in the mail survey group (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.63), but mail respondents were less likely to use the \"extremely positive\" response category. Principal component analysis identified four factors that accounted for 56% of the variance: interpersonal skills and information transfer, physical surroundings, convenience, and appointment delay. Patients' comments on open-ended questions validated the semantic content of the factorial construct. The internal consistency coefficient was greater than 0.70 for three of four subscales. Patient background characteristics accounted for less than 10% of the factorial score variance. Patient satisfaction was correlated with age, type of visit, and, to a lesser extent, gender and education level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This easily administered, multidimensional out-patient-satisfaction questionnaire provided encouraging preliminary psychometric characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":79831,"journal":{"name":"Clinical performance and quality health care","volume":"7 2","pages":"63-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical performance and quality health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Following 1996 legislation requiring French hospitals to assess patient satisfaction, this study developed and validated a brief French-language multidimensional questionnaire designed to measure outpatient satisfaction with hospital visits and compared data quality for two patient-satisfaction survey methods.

Design: Authors developed a 19-item questionnaire following a strict procedure (identification of dimensions to explore, formulation, and selection of items).

Setting: Validation data were obtained from patients of six outpatient clinics in a teaching hospital.

Participants: 586 consenting eligible patients were randomized to receive the questionnaire 2 weeks after their visit with one of two survey methods: a mailed self-administered questionnaire or a telephone interview.

Results: The response rate (79%) was not significantly different between the two survey methods. The risk of having one or more missing values was higher in the mail survey group (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.63), but mail respondents were less likely to use the "extremely positive" response category. Principal component analysis identified four factors that accounted for 56% of the variance: interpersonal skills and information transfer, physical surroundings, convenience, and appointment delay. Patients' comments on open-ended questions validated the semantic content of the factorial construct. The internal consistency coefficient was greater than 0.70 for three of four subscales. Patient background characteristics accounted for less than 10% of the factorial score variance. Patient satisfaction was correlated with age, type of visit, and, to a lesser extent, gender and education level.

Conclusion: This easily administered, multidimensional out-patient-satisfaction questionnaire provided encouraging preliminary psychometric characteristics.

门诊满意度:法语问卷的验证:数据质量和相关因素的识别。
目的:继1996年立法要求法国医院评估患者满意度之后,本研究开发并验证了一份简短的法语多维问卷,旨在衡量门诊患者对医院就诊的满意度,并比较了两种患者满意度调查方法的数据质量。设计:作者按照严格的程序(确定要探索的维度,制定和选择项目)开发了一份19项问卷。背景:验证数据来自某教学医院6个门诊的患者。参与者:586名符合条件的患者在就诊2周后随机接受问卷调查,采用两种调查方法之一:邮寄自填问卷或电话访谈。结果:两种调查方法的有效率均为79%,差异无统计学意义。邮件调查组有一个或多个缺失值的风险更高(优势比,1.65;95%置信区间,1.03-2.63),但邮件受访者不太可能使用“非常积极”的回应类别。主成分分析确定了四个因素占56%的差异:人际交往能力和信息传递、物理环境、便利性和约会延迟。患者对开放式问题的评论验证了析因结构的语义内容。4个分量表中有3个的内部一致性系数大于0.70。患者背景特征占因子评分方差的比例小于10%。患者满意度与年龄、就诊类型相关,与性别和受教育程度相关程度较小。结论:这个易于操作的多维门诊满意度问卷提供了令人鼓舞的初步心理测量特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信