The morselized and impacted bone graft. Animal experiments on proteins, impaction and load.

M Tägil
{"title":"The morselized and impacted bone graft. Animal experiments on proteins, impaction and load.","authors":"M Tägil","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The results of primary hip replacements are good. However, dealing with a loose prosthesis has been problematic, especially when major bone deficiencies are encountered. These problems appear to have been solved by the introduction of the Slooff-Ling method of using morselized and impacted allograft chips. The clinical results are excellent in the hands of the innovators. However, it remains confusing that a thick layer of dead, broken, immunogenic tissue taken from another individual does not resorb and collapse during remodeling. Still harder to understand is the impression, as judged by radiography, that this thick layer seems to incorporate and remodel up to a distance of perhaps 10 mm or more from the host bone, whereas the ingrowth distance into a non-morselized graft is limited to a few mms. To clarify the biological basis of the morselized and impacted grafts better, the present study was stated. Three hypotheses were initially proposed to explain the good clinical results: 1. Morselization releases growth factors present in the graft (osteoinduction). 2. Impaction makes it easier for the ingrowing bone to climb up into the graft (osteoconduction). 3. The compliance or elasticity of the graft allows the load to produce deformations that stimulate bone formation (mechanical load). In the first studies, bone chambers were implanted in rats and the distance of new bone ingrowth into a graft in the chamber was measured. In Paper I, a morselized graft was deproteinized by slow heating under high pressure. Ingrowing bone did not reach so far into the deproteinized graft as into a non-treated one. We concluded that the proteins present in the graft partly determine how far ingrowing new bone will extend into a graft. In Paper II, a cancellous graft was impacted so that the bone volume fraction of the graft rose from 35% in the unimpacted to 65%. The impacted grafts were compared to unimpacted ones and it was shown that impaction reduced the ingrowth of new bone into a graft in the chamber at six weeks. In Paper III, this somewhat unexpected finding was further studied. Syngeneic and allogeneic grafts showed a reduced ingrowth distance at six weeks when impacted, compared to unipacted controls. However, the reduction was not found when the time for ingrowth was extended to 12 weeks, indicating a possible catch-up phenomenon. Moreover, an exogenously applied growth factor, osteogenic protein-1, was found to have increased the ingrowth distance of new bone into impacted grafts at six weeks. In Paper IV, a rabbit knee prosthesis was developed to study the effect of a mechanical load on the remodeling of a morselized and impacted graft. All rabbits had their tibial marrow cavity cleansed of cancellous bone, which was replaced by a morselized and impacted bone graft. Six rabbits received a complete tibial prosthesis with a tibial load-bearing tray and a stem transferring the load to the impacted graft with each step made by the rabbit. Another six rabbits had only the stem, without the tibial tray, inserted into the impacted graft. With this design, the load from walking was not transferred to the graft, since there was no joint surface replacement to transfer the load to the stem and the graft. Thus, the graft was loaded in rabbits receiving a full prosthesis, whereas it was unloaded in the animals receiving only the stem. New bone formation and resorption of the graft were increased in the loaded grafts, and we concluded that a load increases the rate or speed of remodeling. In Paper V, four patients were operated on for vertebral fractures. The fractures were stabilized by plates and the vertebral bodies packed with autogenous morselized graft. After 1.5 years, when the fractures were clinically and radiographically healed, a biopsy was taken. It was found, that even after such a long time, large areas remained unremodeled and sometimes even unrevascularized. In some parts, necrotic graft trabeculae were embedded in fibrous vasc</p>","PeriodicalId":75404,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The results of primary hip replacements are good. However, dealing with a loose prosthesis has been problematic, especially when major bone deficiencies are encountered. These problems appear to have been solved by the introduction of the Slooff-Ling method of using morselized and impacted allograft chips. The clinical results are excellent in the hands of the innovators. However, it remains confusing that a thick layer of dead, broken, immunogenic tissue taken from another individual does not resorb and collapse during remodeling. Still harder to understand is the impression, as judged by radiography, that this thick layer seems to incorporate and remodel up to a distance of perhaps 10 mm or more from the host bone, whereas the ingrowth distance into a non-morselized graft is limited to a few mms. To clarify the biological basis of the morselized and impacted grafts better, the present study was stated. Three hypotheses were initially proposed to explain the good clinical results: 1. Morselization releases growth factors present in the graft (osteoinduction). 2. Impaction makes it easier for the ingrowing bone to climb up into the graft (osteoconduction). 3. The compliance or elasticity of the graft allows the load to produce deformations that stimulate bone formation (mechanical load). In the first studies, bone chambers were implanted in rats and the distance of new bone ingrowth into a graft in the chamber was measured. In Paper I, a morselized graft was deproteinized by slow heating under high pressure. Ingrowing bone did not reach so far into the deproteinized graft as into a non-treated one. We concluded that the proteins present in the graft partly determine how far ingrowing new bone will extend into a graft. In Paper II, a cancellous graft was impacted so that the bone volume fraction of the graft rose from 35% in the unimpacted to 65%. The impacted grafts were compared to unimpacted ones and it was shown that impaction reduced the ingrowth of new bone into a graft in the chamber at six weeks. In Paper III, this somewhat unexpected finding was further studied. Syngeneic and allogeneic grafts showed a reduced ingrowth distance at six weeks when impacted, compared to unipacted controls. However, the reduction was not found when the time for ingrowth was extended to 12 weeks, indicating a possible catch-up phenomenon. Moreover, an exogenously applied growth factor, osteogenic protein-1, was found to have increased the ingrowth distance of new bone into impacted grafts at six weeks. In Paper IV, a rabbit knee prosthesis was developed to study the effect of a mechanical load on the remodeling of a morselized and impacted graft. All rabbits had their tibial marrow cavity cleansed of cancellous bone, which was replaced by a morselized and impacted bone graft. Six rabbits received a complete tibial prosthesis with a tibial load-bearing tray and a stem transferring the load to the impacted graft with each step made by the rabbit. Another six rabbits had only the stem, without the tibial tray, inserted into the impacted graft. With this design, the load from walking was not transferred to the graft, since there was no joint surface replacement to transfer the load to the stem and the graft. Thus, the graft was loaded in rabbits receiving a full prosthesis, whereas it was unloaded in the animals receiving only the stem. New bone formation and resorption of the graft were increased in the loaded grafts, and we concluded that a load increases the rate or speed of remodeling. In Paper V, four patients were operated on for vertebral fractures. The fractures were stabilized by plates and the vertebral bodies packed with autogenous morselized graft. After 1.5 years, when the fractures were clinically and radiographically healed, a biopsy was taken. It was found, that even after such a long time, large areas remained unremodeled and sometimes even unrevascularized. In some parts, necrotic graft trabeculae were embedded in fibrous vasc

块状和阻生骨移植物。蛋白质、内嵌和负荷的动物实验。
原发性髋关节置换术的效果良好。然而,处理松散的假体是有问题的,特别是当遇到严重的骨缺陷时。这些问题似乎已经解决了引入sloff - ling方法,使用碎片化和冲击同种异体移植芯片。在创新者的手中,临床结果非常好。然而,令人困惑的是,从另一个人身上取出的一层厚厚的死亡、破碎的免疫原性组织在重塑过程中不会被吸收和塌陷。更难以理解的是,根据x线摄影判断,这层厚层似乎与宿主骨融合并重塑了10毫米或更大的距离,而向内生长到非块状移植物的距离仅为几毫米。为了更好地阐明碎片化和阻生移植物的生物学基础,本文进行了研究。对于良好的临床结果,初步提出了三种假设:1。碎片化释放移植物中存在的生长因子(成骨)。2. 嵌塞使生长的骨更容易爬上移植物(骨传导)。3.移植物的顺应性或弹性允许载荷产生变形,刺激骨形成(机械载荷)。在最初的研究中,在大鼠体内植入骨腔,并测量新骨长入腔内移植物的距离。在第一篇论文中,采用高压下缓慢加热的方法对块状接枝进行脱蛋白处理。生长的骨在去蛋白的移植物中没有像在未处理的移植物中那样深入。我们的结论是,移植物中存在的蛋白质在一定程度上决定了植入的新骨在移植物中延伸的距离。在论文II中,对松质骨移植物进行撞击,使移植物的骨体积分数从未撞击组的35%上升到65%。将阻生的移植物与未阻生的移植物进行比较,结果表明,在6周时,阻生减少了新骨向腔内移植物的生长。在论文III中,我们进一步研究了这一出人意料的发现。同基因和同种异体移植物与未受影响的对照相比,在受影响6周时显示出较短的长入距离。然而,当生长时间延长到12周时,并没有发现这种减少,这表明可能存在追赶现象。此外,发现外源性生长因子成骨蛋白-1在6周时增加了新骨进入阻生移植物的生长距离。在第四篇论文中,我们开发了一种兔膝假体,研究机械负荷对摩尔化和阻生移植物重塑的影响。所有家兔的胫骨骨髓腔均清除松质骨,用块状和阻生骨移植物代替。6只兔子接受了一个完整的胫骨假体,其中有一个胫骨承重托盘和一个将负载转移到受阻移植物的干,每一步都由兔子完成。另外6只家兔只有胫骨干,没有胫骨托盘,插入到阻生移植物中。在这种设计中,行走的负荷不会转移到移植物上,因为没有关节面替代来将负荷转移到关节杆和移植物上。因此,在接受完整假体的兔子身上装载移植物,而在只接受假体茎的动物身上则卸下移植物。新骨形成和移植物的吸收在负载的移植物中增加,我们得出的结论是负载增加了重塑的速率或速度。在论文V中,有4例患者接受了椎体骨折手术。骨折用钢板固定,椎体用自体块状移植物填充。1年半后,当骨折临床和影像学愈合时,进行活检。人们发现,即使过了这么长时间,仍有大片区域没有重建,有时甚至没有血管重建。部分坏死的移植物小梁嵌入纤维性血管
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信