Minimal access esophagectomy: where are we up to?

D Gossot, L Toledo, A Cortes
{"title":"Minimal access esophagectomy: where are we up to?","authors":"D Gossot,&nbsp;L Toledo,&nbsp;A Cortes","doi":"10.1053/slas.2000.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic techniques for esophagectomy are disparate. The aim of this article is to describe the main surgical endoscopic techniques applied to esophagectomy and to report their results. In most published series, the benefit in terms of postoperative morbidity cannot be demonstrated. This reflects the fact that postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy is related not only with the type of surgical approach but also with other factors related to the patient's status. Finally, the lack of long-term follow-up in most series does not permit to draw conclusion about the relevance of endoscopic esophagectomy. Contrary to other advanced surgical endoscopic procedures, endoscopic esophagectomy has not yet been convincing.</p>","PeriodicalId":79535,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in laparoscopic surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":"2-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in laparoscopic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/slas.2000.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endoscopic techniques for esophagectomy are disparate. The aim of this article is to describe the main surgical endoscopic techniques applied to esophagectomy and to report their results. In most published series, the benefit in terms of postoperative morbidity cannot be demonstrated. This reflects the fact that postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy is related not only with the type of surgical approach but also with other factors related to the patient's status. Finally, the lack of long-term follow-up in most series does not permit to draw conclusion about the relevance of endoscopic esophagectomy. Contrary to other advanced surgical endoscopic procedures, endoscopic esophagectomy has not yet been convincing.

微创食管切除术:进展如何?
食管切除术的内镜技术是不同的。本文的目的是描述用于食管切除术的主要手术内窥镜技术并报告其结果。在大多数已发表的系列文章中,不能证明在术后发病率方面的益处。这反映了食管切除术后的术后发病率不仅与手术入路类型有关,还与其他与患者状态相关的因素有关。最后,大多数系列缺乏长期随访,无法得出内镜食管切除术相关性的结论。与其他先进的外科内镜手术相反,内镜食管切除术尚未令人信服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信