H H Chen, A J Iroatulam, O Alabaz, J S Joo, E G Weiss, J J Nogueras, S D Wexner
{"title":"Laparoscopic colectomy is superior to laparotomy for reduction of disability in patients with colorectal adenoma.","authors":"H H Chen, A J Iroatulam, O Alabaz, J S Joo, E G Weiss, J J Nogueras, S D Wexner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was to evaluate disability after laparoscopic colectomy in patients with colorectal adenomas as compared to disability after laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal adenoma were compared to patients who underwent laparotomy for the same problem by the same surgeons during the same time period in Cleveland Clinic Florida. A standard questionnaire was used to assess disability which included the number of days to return to partial activity, full activity, and work.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients who underwent laparoscopy were compared with 31 patients who underwent laparotomy. There were no significant differences in age (70.4 vs 72.5 years) (p = 0.405) or gender (M:F 13:16 vs 20:11) (p = 0.126) between the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups. The operative time was longer for the laparoscopy group than the laparotomy group: 170 vs 131 minutes (p = 0.014). However, the duration of postoperative ileus, hospitalization, time until return to partial activity, time until return to full activity, and time off of work were significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group: 3.3 vs 5.2 days, 6.2 vs 8.7 days, 2.3 vs 4.2 weeks, 4.4 vs 9.3 weeks, and 3.7 vs 7.3 weeks, respectively (p < 0.041 for all). Although the incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different (24% for laparoscopy vs 29% for laparotomy, p = 0.325), the incidence of postoperative prolonged ileus was statistically significantly lower in the laparoscopy group (3% vs 26%, p = 0.027).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic colectomy for patients with colorectal adenoma can reduce postoperative ileus, postoperative hospitalization, and disability in terms of a quicker return to partial activity, full activity, and employment. Laparoscopic colectomy should be considered for all patients who have colorectal adenomas which require resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":77066,"journal":{"name":"Changgeng yi xue za zhi","volume":"22 4","pages":"586-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Changgeng yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study was to evaluate disability after laparoscopic colectomy in patients with colorectal adenomas as compared to disability after laparotomy.
Methods: Patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal adenoma were compared to patients who underwent laparotomy for the same problem by the same surgeons during the same time period in Cleveland Clinic Florida. A standard questionnaire was used to assess disability which included the number of days to return to partial activity, full activity, and work.
Results: Twenty-nine patients who underwent laparoscopy were compared with 31 patients who underwent laparotomy. There were no significant differences in age (70.4 vs 72.5 years) (p = 0.405) or gender (M:F 13:16 vs 20:11) (p = 0.126) between the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups. The operative time was longer for the laparoscopy group than the laparotomy group: 170 vs 131 minutes (p = 0.014). However, the duration of postoperative ileus, hospitalization, time until return to partial activity, time until return to full activity, and time off of work were significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group: 3.3 vs 5.2 days, 6.2 vs 8.7 days, 2.3 vs 4.2 weeks, 4.4 vs 9.3 weeks, and 3.7 vs 7.3 weeks, respectively (p < 0.041 for all). Although the incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different (24% for laparoscopy vs 29% for laparotomy, p = 0.325), the incidence of postoperative prolonged ileus was statistically significantly lower in the laparoscopy group (3% vs 26%, p = 0.027).
Conclusion: Laparoscopic colectomy for patients with colorectal adenoma can reduce postoperative ileus, postoperative hospitalization, and disability in terms of a quicker return to partial activity, full activity, and employment. Laparoscopic colectomy should be considered for all patients who have colorectal adenomas which require resection.
背景:本研究旨在评价腹腔镜结肠切除术后致残的结肠腺瘤患者与剖腹手术后致残的患者。方法:将佛罗里达州克利夫兰诊所同一时间内接受腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗结直肠腺瘤的患者与接受剖腹手术治疗相同问题的患者进行比较。使用标准问卷评估残疾,包括恢复部分活动、完全活动和工作的天数。结果:29例患者行腹腔镜手术,31例患者行开腹手术。腹腔镜组和开腹组在年龄(70.4 vs 72.5岁)(p = 0.405)和性别(M:F 13:16 vs 20:11) (p = 0.126)上无显著差异。腹腔镜组手术时间较开腹组更长,分别为170分钟和131分钟(p = 0.014)。然而,腹腔镜组术后肠梗阻持续时间、住院时间、恢复部分活动时间、恢复完全活动时间和休息时间均明显短于开腹组:分别为3.3 vs 5.2天、6.2 vs 8.7天、2.3 vs 4.2周、4.4 vs 9.3周和3.7 vs 7.3周(均p < 0.041)。虽然两组术后并发症发生率无显著差异(腹腔镜组为24%,开腹组为29%,p = 0.325),但腹腔镜组术后延长性肠梗阻发生率明显低于开腹组(3%,p = 0.027)。结论:腹腔镜结肠切除术对结直肠腺瘤患者可减少术后肠梗阻、术后住院和残疾,更快地恢复部分活动、完全活动和就业。所有需要切除的结直肠腺瘤患者都应考虑腹腔镜结肠切除术。