Rationale for intergroup trial E-3695 comparing concurrent biochemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, and DTIC alone in patients with metastatic melanoma.

L E Flaherty
{"title":"Rationale for intergroup trial E-3695 comparing concurrent biochemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, and DTIC alone in patients with metastatic melanoma.","authors":"L E Flaherty","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The modest activity of chemotherapy and biologic agents in the treatment of advanced metastatic melanoma has prompted investigators to consider combinations of chemotherapy and biologic agents (i.e., biochemotherapy) as a way of improving response rates and survival. Although biochemotherapy has generated a great deal of interest over the last several years, and these regimens have produced high response rates in single-institution phase II trials, they have yet to demonstrate a significant survival benefit in randomized trials compared with either chemotherapy or biotherapy alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The available literature regarding the clinical experience with single- and multiagent chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and biochemotherapy was reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment of metastatic melanoma with either single-agent or combination chemotherapy regimens is clearly suboptimal; the majority of responses are partial and of short duration. In contrast, interleukin (IL)-2 produces long-term durable complete remission in a subset of patients. Over 1,000 patients have been treated with IL-2-based biochemotherapy regimens in single-institution phase II trials, and response rates have ranged from 40% to 60%. Most encouraging have been the durable responses observed in 10% to 20% of patients in most of these trials. Large databases, including two meta-analyses, have confirmed the substantial improvement in response rate associated with biochemotherapy regimens that include both IL-2 and interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) compared with chemotherapy or biotherapy alone. Biochemotherapy is currently being evaluated in randomized controlled trials to determine if this treatment strategy can provide a survival benefit compared with current standard treatments. A pilot study at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center has demonstrated the feasibility of administering a modification of a concurrent biochemotherapy regimen, initially described by Legha et al, consisting of cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (CVD) plus IL-2 and IFN-alpha in the cooperative group setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These studies provided the rationale for intergroup trial E-3695, which is currently randomizing patients to concurrent biochemotherapy with CVD plus IL-2 and IFN-alpha versus CVD alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":79462,"journal":{"name":"The cancer journal from Scientific American","volume":"6 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The cancer journal from Scientific American","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The modest activity of chemotherapy and biologic agents in the treatment of advanced metastatic melanoma has prompted investigators to consider combinations of chemotherapy and biologic agents (i.e., biochemotherapy) as a way of improving response rates and survival. Although biochemotherapy has generated a great deal of interest over the last several years, and these regimens have produced high response rates in single-institution phase II trials, they have yet to demonstrate a significant survival benefit in randomized trials compared with either chemotherapy or biotherapy alone.

Methods: The available literature regarding the clinical experience with single- and multiagent chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and biochemotherapy was reviewed.

Results: Treatment of metastatic melanoma with either single-agent or combination chemotherapy regimens is clearly suboptimal; the majority of responses are partial and of short duration. In contrast, interleukin (IL)-2 produces long-term durable complete remission in a subset of patients. Over 1,000 patients have been treated with IL-2-based biochemotherapy regimens in single-institution phase II trials, and response rates have ranged from 40% to 60%. Most encouraging have been the durable responses observed in 10% to 20% of patients in most of these trials. Large databases, including two meta-analyses, have confirmed the substantial improvement in response rate associated with biochemotherapy regimens that include both IL-2 and interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) compared with chemotherapy or biotherapy alone. Biochemotherapy is currently being evaluated in randomized controlled trials to determine if this treatment strategy can provide a survival benefit compared with current standard treatments. A pilot study at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center has demonstrated the feasibility of administering a modification of a concurrent biochemotherapy regimen, initially described by Legha et al, consisting of cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (CVD) plus IL-2 and IFN-alpha in the cooperative group setting.

Conclusion: These studies provided the rationale for intergroup trial E-3695, which is currently randomizing patients to concurrent biochemotherapy with CVD plus IL-2 and IFN-alpha versus CVD alone.

组间试验E-3695比较转移性黑色素瘤患者同时使用顺铂、长春碱和DTIC进行生物化疗的基本原理。
目的:化疗和生物制剂在晚期转移性黑色素瘤治疗中的适度活性促使研究人员考虑化疗和生物制剂(即生物化疗)的联合使用,作为提高反应率和生存率的一种方式。尽管生物化疗在过去几年中引起了极大的兴趣,并且这些方案在单机构II期试验中产生了很高的反应率,但在随机试验中,与单独化疗或生物治疗相比,它们尚未显示出显著的生存益处。方法:查阅有关单药和多药化疗、免疫治疗和生物化疗的临床经验。结果:单药或联合化疗方案治疗转移性黑色素瘤显然是次优的;大多数反应是局部的,持续时间短。相反,白细胞介素(IL)-2在一部分患者中产生长期持久的完全缓解。在单机构II期试验中,超过1000名患者接受了基于il -2的生物化疗方案的治疗,反应率从40%到60%不等。最令人鼓舞的是,在大多数这些试验中,10%至20%的患者观察到持久的反应。包括两项荟萃分析在内的大型数据库证实,与单独化疗或生物治疗相比,包括IL-2和干扰素α (ifn - α)的生物化疗方案在缓解率方面有实质性改善。生物化疗目前正在随机对照试验中进行评估,以确定与目前的标准治疗相比,这种治疗策略是否能提供生存优势。贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心的一项试点研究表明,在合作组环境下,对Legha等人最初描述的同步生物化疗方案进行修改是可行的,该方案由顺铂、长春花碱和达卡巴嗪(CVD)加IL-2和ifn - α组成。结论:这些研究为组间试验E-3695提供了理论依据,该试验目前将患者随机分组,接受CVD + IL-2和ifn - α同步生物化疗,而不是单独CVD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书