Influence de l'apprentissage et de l'expérience dans le traitement laparoscopique du reflux gastro-œsophagien

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
C. Barrat, R. Cueto-Rozon, J.M. Catheline, N. Rizk, G. Champault
{"title":"Influence de l'apprentissage et de l'expérience dans le traitement laparoscopique du reflux gastro-œsophagien","authors":"C. Barrat,&nbsp;R. Cueto-Rozon,&nbsp;J.M. Catheline,&nbsp;N. Rizk,&nbsp;G. Champault","doi":"10.1016/S0001-4001(99)00072-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Learning curve and experience in laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.</p><p>Study aim: Laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by partial (PF) or total (TF) fundoplication is the most appropriate surgical treatment after failure of medical treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the same series in three consecutive periods in order to determine the effects of the learning curve and experience on the technique and outcome.</p><p>Patients and methods: From January 1993 to January 1998, 150 patients (84 men and 66 women) with a mean age of 52.2 years (18 to 78) were included. Three groups of 49, 50 and 51 patients were chronologically defined. The comparison was established on the following criteria: the operative technique; the conversion rate; the mortality and morbidity rate; the duration of surgery and hospitalization and the results with short and medium follow-up.</p><p>Results: The three groups were comparable with respect to patients and GERD characteristics. One hundred and thirty two patients had a TF and 18 had a PF. Rossetti's type TF became the reference procedure (80,3% in group III) and closure of the diaphragmatic crura was performed systematically in group III (100%). The duration of surgery was significantly reduced between group I and the two other groups (138, 100, 80min). The rate of conversion decreased from 10,2% to 4% and then 0%. The average duration of hospitalization decreased from 5.8 to 4.2 days (p=0.01). There was no mortality and the morbidity rate decreased from 14,3% to 4% and then 0%. Seven cases of recurrence occurred(4.6%), 5 in group I (10,2%), 2 in group II (4%), and 0 in group III, (with a shorter follow-up).</p><p>Conclusion: The effect of the learning curve has to be taken into account in the training of surgeons (within experienced departments, with «guidance» during initial interventions) and also in the evaluation of results, in order to allow a more accurate comparison between the different treatments for GERD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29786,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie","volume":"124 6","pages":"Pages 675-680"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0001-4001(99)00072-0","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001400199000720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Learning curve and experience in laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Study aim: Laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by partial (PF) or total (TF) fundoplication is the most appropriate surgical treatment after failure of medical treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the same series in three consecutive periods in order to determine the effects of the learning curve and experience on the technique and outcome.

Patients and methods: From January 1993 to January 1998, 150 patients (84 men and 66 women) with a mean age of 52.2 years (18 to 78) were included. Three groups of 49, 50 and 51 patients were chronologically defined. The comparison was established on the following criteria: the operative technique; the conversion rate; the mortality and morbidity rate; the duration of surgery and hospitalization and the results with short and medium follow-up.

Results: The three groups were comparable with respect to patients and GERD characteristics. One hundred and thirty two patients had a TF and 18 had a PF. Rossetti's type TF became the reference procedure (80,3% in group III) and closure of the diaphragmatic crura was performed systematically in group III (100%). The duration of surgery was significantly reduced between group I and the two other groups (138, 100, 80min). The rate of conversion decreased from 10,2% to 4% and then 0%. The average duration of hospitalization decreased from 5.8 to 4.2 days (p=0.01). There was no mortality and the morbidity rate decreased from 14,3% to 4% and then 0%. Seven cases of recurrence occurred(4.6%), 5 in group I (10,2%), 2 in group II (4%), and 0 in group III, (with a shorter follow-up).

Conclusion: The effect of the learning curve has to be taken into account in the training of surgeons (within experienced departments, with «guidance» during initial interventions) and also in the evaluation of results, in order to allow a more accurate comparison between the different treatments for GERD.

学习和经验对腹腔镜胃食管反流治疗的影响
腹腔镜治疗胃食管反流病的学习曲线与经验。研究目的:腹腔镜下胃食管反流病(GERD)经部分(PF)或全部(TF)底翻术治疗药物治疗失败后最合适的手术治疗方法。本研究的目的是比较同一系列连续三个时期的结果,以确定学习曲线和经验对技术和结果的影响。患者与方法:1993年1月至1998年1月共纳入150例患者,男84例,女66例,平均年龄52.2岁(18 ~ 78岁)。三组患者分别为49例、50例和51例。比较标准如下:手术技术;转化率;死亡率和发病率;手术时间、住院时间及中短期随访结果。结果:三组在患者和胃反流特征方面具有可比性。132例患者有TF, 18例有PF。Rossetti型TF成为参考手术(III组为80,3%),III组系统地进行膈脚闭合(100%)。与其他两组相比,I组手术时间明显缩短(138,100,80min)。转化率从10.2%下降到4%,再下降到0%。平均住院时间由5.8天降至4.2天(p=0.01)。无死亡,发病率由14.3%降至4%,再降至0%。复发7例(4.6%),I组5例(10.2%),II组2例(4%),III组0例(随访时间较短)。结论:在对外科医生的培训中(在经验丰富的科室中,在初始干预期间有“指导”),以及在对结果的评估中,必须考虑到学习曲线的影响,以便更准确地比较不同的胃食管反流治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
22.20%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信