Conservative treatment of scaphoid fractures: a follow up study.

Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae Pub Date : 1999-01-01
L Raudasoja, M Rawlins, P Kallio, J Vasenius
{"title":"Conservative treatment of scaphoid fractures: a follow up study.","authors":"L Raudasoja,&nbsp;M Rawlins,&nbsp;P Kallio,&nbsp;J Vasenius","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This investigation was made to elucidate the outcome of conservatively treated scaphoid fractures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>63 patients with a scaphoid fracture were treated initially conservatively and examined retrospectively. The mean follow up time was 54 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this group bone union was achieved in 56 cases (89%). Three of the patients ended up to operation because of delayed union soon after conservative treatment and three nonunions were found in the follow up appointment. One fracture did not heal because of dislocation during cast treatment and was treated with operation. Incidence of osteoarthrosis and residual symptoms were studied in the group with totally conservative treatment. Osteoarthrosis was found in 19 (32%) wrists, but no correlation with wrist problems (pain, reduced grip strength or problems at work) was found. 20 (34%) of the patients complained residual symptoms. Most of the symptoms were mild and did not impair their ability to work or cause serious problems during free time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the present study conservative treatment is a safe method for the treatment of undislocated stabile scaphoid fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":75495,"journal":{"name":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae","volume":"88 4","pages":"289-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: This investigation was made to elucidate the outcome of conservatively treated scaphoid fractures.

Material and methods: 63 patients with a scaphoid fracture were treated initially conservatively and examined retrospectively. The mean follow up time was 54 months.

Results: In this group bone union was achieved in 56 cases (89%). Three of the patients ended up to operation because of delayed union soon after conservative treatment and three nonunions were found in the follow up appointment. One fracture did not heal because of dislocation during cast treatment and was treated with operation. Incidence of osteoarthrosis and residual symptoms were studied in the group with totally conservative treatment. Osteoarthrosis was found in 19 (32%) wrists, but no correlation with wrist problems (pain, reduced grip strength or problems at work) was found. 20 (34%) of the patients complained residual symptoms. Most of the symptoms were mild and did not impair their ability to work or cause serious problems during free time.

Conclusion: According to the present study conservative treatment is a safe method for the treatment of undislocated stabile scaphoid fractures.

舟骨骨折的保守治疗:一项随访研究。
背景和目的:本研究旨在阐明保守治疗舟状骨骨折的结果。材料和方法:对63例舟状骨骨折患者进行初步保守治疗和回顾性检查。平均随访时间54个月。结果:本组骨愈合56例(89%)。其中3例患者在保守治疗后不久因延迟愈合而最终手术,3例患者在随访时发现不愈合。1例骨折在铸型治疗中因脱位未愈合,手术治疗。观察全保守治疗组骨关节病及残余症状的发生情况。19例(32%)腕部发现骨关节病,但与腕部问题(疼痛、握力下降或工作问题)无关。20例(34%)患者有残留症状。大多数症状都很轻微,不会影响他们的工作能力,也不会在空闲时间造成严重问题。结论:保守治疗是治疗未脱位的稳定型舟状骨骨折的一种安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信