{"title":"Fluid replacement preferences in heat-exposed workers.","authors":"A J Clapp, P A Bishop, J L Walker","doi":"10.1080/00028899908984497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined fluid intake, weight changes, and palatability of water and a carbohydrate-electrolyte (ECHO) beverage in two groups of eight subjects performing 4 hours of simulated industrial work while wearing impermeable protective clothing. Subjects also rated the palatability of a flavorless orange-colored water and four commercially available orange-flavored fluid-replacement drinks. Subjects worked 30 min at 300 Kcal/hour (moderate work rate), followed by 30 min of rest for a total of 4 hours in each of three environments: 18, 23, 27 degrees C wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT). Eight subjects drank water and eight drank an ECHO beverage (Drink 1). Mean sweat production was similar between groups at each WBGT, (p > 0.05). Mean weight changes expressed as percentage of total body weight for the water-drinking group were -0.25 (+/- 0.16) kg in 18 degrees C, -0.55 (+/- 0.09) kg in 23 degrees C, and -0.93 (+/- 0.13) kg in 27 degrees C. Mean weight changes for the ECHO-drinking group were 0.49 (+/- 0.12) kg in 18 degrees C, 0.13 (+/- 0.12) kg in 23 degrees C, and -0.02 (+/- 0.14) kg in 27 degrees C. Each change was significantly different from that of the water-drinking group at the same temperatures (p < 0.05). Mean pre- to post-trial palatability rating results for all temperatures revealed differences in taste perception with strong preferences for Drinks 1 and 2 (pre to post): Drink 1, 3.8 to 3.6; Drink 2, 3.8 to 3.7; Drink 3, 3.0 to 2.7, Drink 4 (water), 3.2 to 3.0, and Drink 5, 2.1 to 1.6. Drinks 1 and 2 were rated significantly more palatable (p < 0.05) than Drink 3. All drinks had a reduced flavor appeal from 3.18 (+0.96) preratings to 2.92 (+1.01) postratings (p < 0.05). Mean voluntary consumption during work across the three temperatures was 1561.5 mL (+/- 720.1) for ECHO versus 1062.7 mL (+/- 666.4) for water (p = 0.054). The water group experienced greater weight loss than the ECHO group, suggesting a greater rate of dehydration when water was used for fluid replacement.</p>","PeriodicalId":7930,"journal":{"name":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","volume":"60 6","pages":"747-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00028899908984497","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00028899908984497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
Abstract
This study examined fluid intake, weight changes, and palatability of water and a carbohydrate-electrolyte (ECHO) beverage in two groups of eight subjects performing 4 hours of simulated industrial work while wearing impermeable protective clothing. Subjects also rated the palatability of a flavorless orange-colored water and four commercially available orange-flavored fluid-replacement drinks. Subjects worked 30 min at 300 Kcal/hour (moderate work rate), followed by 30 min of rest for a total of 4 hours in each of three environments: 18, 23, 27 degrees C wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT). Eight subjects drank water and eight drank an ECHO beverage (Drink 1). Mean sweat production was similar between groups at each WBGT, (p > 0.05). Mean weight changes expressed as percentage of total body weight for the water-drinking group were -0.25 (+/- 0.16) kg in 18 degrees C, -0.55 (+/- 0.09) kg in 23 degrees C, and -0.93 (+/- 0.13) kg in 27 degrees C. Mean weight changes for the ECHO-drinking group were 0.49 (+/- 0.12) kg in 18 degrees C, 0.13 (+/- 0.12) kg in 23 degrees C, and -0.02 (+/- 0.14) kg in 27 degrees C. Each change was significantly different from that of the water-drinking group at the same temperatures (p < 0.05). Mean pre- to post-trial palatability rating results for all temperatures revealed differences in taste perception with strong preferences for Drinks 1 and 2 (pre to post): Drink 1, 3.8 to 3.6; Drink 2, 3.8 to 3.7; Drink 3, 3.0 to 2.7, Drink 4 (water), 3.2 to 3.0, and Drink 5, 2.1 to 1.6. Drinks 1 and 2 were rated significantly more palatable (p < 0.05) than Drink 3. All drinks had a reduced flavor appeal from 3.18 (+0.96) preratings to 2.92 (+1.01) postratings (p < 0.05). Mean voluntary consumption during work across the three temperatures was 1561.5 mL (+/- 720.1) for ECHO versus 1062.7 mL (+/- 666.4) for water (p = 0.054). The water group experienced greater weight loss than the ECHO group, suggesting a greater rate of dehydration when water was used for fluid replacement.