Evaluation of leakage from a metal machining center using tracer gas methods: a case study.

W A Heitbrink, G S Earnest, R L Mickelsen, K R Mead, J B D'Arcy
{"title":"Evaluation of leakage from a metal machining center using tracer gas methods: a case study.","authors":"W A Heitbrink,&nbsp;G S Earnest,&nbsp;R L Mickelsen,&nbsp;K R Mead,&nbsp;J B D'Arcy","doi":"10.1080/00028899908984502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the efficacy of engineering controls in reducing worker exposure to metalworking fluids, an evaluation of an enclosure for a machining center during face milling was performed. The enclosure was built around a vertical metal machining center with an attached ventilation system consisting of a 25-cm diameter duct, a fan, and an air-cleaning filter. The evaluation method included using sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer gas to determine the ventilation system's flow rate and capture efficiency, a respirable aerosol monitor (RAM) to identify aerosol leak locations around the enclosure, and smoke tubes and a velometer to evaluate air movement around the outside of the enclosure. Results of the tracer gas evaluation indicated that the control system was approximately 98% efficient at capturing tracer gas released near the spindle of the machining center. This result was not significantly different from 100% efficiency (p = 0.2). The measured SF6 concentration when released directly into the duct had a relative standard deviation of 2.2%; whereas, when releasing SF6 at the spindle, the concentration had a significantly higher relative standard deviation of 7.8% (p = 0.016). This increased variability could be due to a cyclic leakage at a small gap between the upper and lower portion of the enclosure or due to cyclic stagnation. Leakage also was observed with smoke tubes, a velometer, and an aerosol photometer. The tool and fluid motion combined to induce a periodic airflow in and out of the enclosure. These results suggest that tracer gas methods could be used to evaluate enclosure efficiency. However, smoke tubes and aerosol instrumentation such as optical particle counters or aerosol photometers also need to be used to locate leakage from enclosures.</p>","PeriodicalId":7930,"journal":{"name":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","volume":"60 6","pages":"785-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00028899908984502","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Industrial Hygiene Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00028899908984502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of engineering controls in reducing worker exposure to metalworking fluids, an evaluation of an enclosure for a machining center during face milling was performed. The enclosure was built around a vertical metal machining center with an attached ventilation system consisting of a 25-cm diameter duct, a fan, and an air-cleaning filter. The evaluation method included using sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer gas to determine the ventilation system's flow rate and capture efficiency, a respirable aerosol monitor (RAM) to identify aerosol leak locations around the enclosure, and smoke tubes and a velometer to evaluate air movement around the outside of the enclosure. Results of the tracer gas evaluation indicated that the control system was approximately 98% efficient at capturing tracer gas released near the spindle of the machining center. This result was not significantly different from 100% efficiency (p = 0.2). The measured SF6 concentration when released directly into the duct had a relative standard deviation of 2.2%; whereas, when releasing SF6 at the spindle, the concentration had a significantly higher relative standard deviation of 7.8% (p = 0.016). This increased variability could be due to a cyclic leakage at a small gap between the upper and lower portion of the enclosure or due to cyclic stagnation. Leakage also was observed with smoke tubes, a velometer, and an aerosol photometer. The tool and fluid motion combined to induce a periodic airflow in and out of the enclosure. These results suggest that tracer gas methods could be used to evaluate enclosure efficiency. However, smoke tubes and aerosol instrumentation such as optical particle counters or aerosol photometers also need to be used to locate leakage from enclosures.

用示踪气体方法评价金属加工中心泄漏:一个案例研究。
为了评估工程控制在减少工人接触金属加工液方面的效果,对加工中心在面铣削过程中的外壳进行了评估。这个外壳是围绕一个垂直的金属加工中心建造的,附带一个通风系统,由一个直径25厘米的管道、一个风扇和一个空气净化过滤器组成。评估方法包括使用六氟化硫(SF6)示踪气体来确定通风系统的流量和捕获效率,使用可呼吸性气溶胶监测仪(RAM)来识别围场周围的气溶胶泄漏位置,以及使用烟雾管和速度计来评估围场外部的空气运动。示踪气体评估结果表明,控制系统在捕获加工中心主轴附近释放的示踪气体方面的效率约为98%。该结果与100%有效率无显著差异(p = 0.2)。直接释放到管道中的SF6浓度的相对标准偏差为2.2%;而在纺锤体释放SF6时,浓度的相对标准偏差显著高于7.8% (p = 0.016)。这种增加的可变性可能是由于在外壳的上下部分之间的一个小间隙的循环泄漏或由于循环停滞。还用烟管、测速仪和气溶胶光度计观察了泄漏。工具和流体运动结合在一起,形成周期性的气流进出外壳。这些结果表明,示踪气体法可用于评价围护效率。然而,烟雾管和气溶胶仪器,如光学粒子计数器或气溶胶光度计也需要用于定位外壳的泄漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信