Mechanical environment affects allograft incorporation.

Journal of biomedical materials research Pub Date : 2000-01-01 DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(2000)53:1<67::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-#

J Benevenia, M Zimmerman, J Keating, F Cyran, M Blacksin, J R Parsons

{"title":"Mechanical environment affects allograft incorporation.","authors":"J Benevenia, M Zimmerman, J Keating, F Cyran, M Blacksin, J R Parsons","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(2000)53:1<67::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-#","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a bilateral canine tibial model, the mechanical, radiologic, and histologic characteristics of intercalary allografts stabilized with locked intramedullary nails were compared with those of allografts fixed with compression plates. Both methods of fixation achieved healing to host bone. Tibiae that were plated had more callus with statistically greater mean torsional rigidity and strength than those treated with nails (paired t-test, p </= 0.05). On average, tibiae which had been plated had much higher bending rigidity than those fixed with locked nails; however, the difference in means was not statistically significant. Histomorphometric analysis showed an overall greater total bone formation in those limbs treated with plates compared to nails (paired t-test, p </= 0.04). The mechanical environment created by the different fixation methods are thought to be responsible for the observed differences in healing pattern. The traditional concept of fixation for allografts to achieve maximum rigidity of the construct may not necessarily promote the most appropriate host healing response in all situations. A less rigid fixation method (plates) produced more callus resulting in superior torsional and bending properties. These data show that in this canine intercalary allograft model, limbs fixed with plates produced more external callus resulting in stronger, more rigid healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":15159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research","volume":"53 1","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(2000)53:1<67::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-#","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(2000)53:1<67::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-#","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 17

Abstract

In a bilateral canine tibial model, the mechanical, radiologic, and histologic characteristics of intercalary allografts stabilized with locked intramedullary nails were compared with those of allografts fixed with compression plates. Both methods of fixation achieved healing to host bone. Tibiae that were plated had more callus with statistically greater mean torsional rigidity and strength than those treated with nails (paired t-test, p

查看原文本刊更多论文

机械环境影响同种异体移植物的结合。

在双侧犬胫骨模型中，我们比较了髓内钉固定的同种异体骨移植与加压钢板固定的同种异体骨移植的力学、放射学和组织学特征。两种固定方法均可实现宿主骨的愈合。钢板胫骨骨痂较多，平均扭转刚度和强度均高于钉钉治疗(配对t检验，p

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of biomedical materials research

自引率

0.00%

发文量