Conjectures and refutations on the mode of action of heparins. The limited importance of anti-factor xa activity as a pharmaceutical mechanism and a yardstick for therapy.

Haemostasis Pub Date : 1999-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000022497
S Béguin, D Welzel, R Al Dieri, H C Hemker
{"title":"Conjectures and refutations on the mode of action of heparins. The limited importance of anti-factor xa activity as a pharmaceutical mechanism and a yardstick for therapy.","authors":"S Béguin,&nbsp;D Welzel,&nbsp;R Al Dieri,&nbsp;H C Hemker","doi":"10.1159/000022497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), like unfractionated heparin (UFH), exert their action primarily by accelerating the interaction between antithrombin (AT) and thrombin. At the levels of aXa activity that are attained in human pharmacology, it does not cause significant (>15%) inhibition of the clotting system. The essential differences between LMWHs and UFH are: (a) LMWHs attain higher plasma concentrations after subcutaneous injection (high bioavailability), and (b) in contrast to LMWHs, UFH contains very large heparin molecules with a putative hemorrhagic action. The reputedly higher aXa activity of LMWH can be shown to be largely due to the absence of Ca(2+) using the current laboratory methods to estimate this activity. Via this artifact the apparently high aXa activity of LMWHs is correlated but not related to their favorable pharmacokinetic properties. Consequently dosage guidelines for the use of different LMWHs cannot be based upon their aXa activity. Until better laboratory methods are available, clinical results are the only reliable guideline to heparin dosage.</p>","PeriodicalId":12910,"journal":{"name":"Haemostasis","volume":"29 2-3","pages":"170-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000022497","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000022497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), like unfractionated heparin (UFH), exert their action primarily by accelerating the interaction between antithrombin (AT) and thrombin. At the levels of aXa activity that are attained in human pharmacology, it does not cause significant (>15%) inhibition of the clotting system. The essential differences between LMWHs and UFH are: (a) LMWHs attain higher plasma concentrations after subcutaneous injection (high bioavailability), and (b) in contrast to LMWHs, UFH contains very large heparin molecules with a putative hemorrhagic action. The reputedly higher aXa activity of LMWH can be shown to be largely due to the absence of Ca(2+) using the current laboratory methods to estimate this activity. Via this artifact the apparently high aXa activity of LMWHs is correlated but not related to their favorable pharmacokinetic properties. Consequently dosage guidelines for the use of different LMWHs cannot be based upon their aXa activity. Until better laboratory methods are available, clinical results are the only reliable guideline to heparin dosage.

关于肝素作用方式的猜想与反驳。抗xa因子活性作为药物机制和治疗标准的重要性有限。
低分子量肝素(LMWHs),如未分级肝素(UFH),主要通过加速抗凝血酶(AT)和凝血酶之间的相互作用来发挥作用。在人类药理学中获得的aXa活性水平下,它不会引起凝血系统的显着(>15%)抑制。低分子肝素和UFH之间的本质区别是:(a)低分子肝素在皮下注射后获得更高的血浆浓度(高生物利用度);(b)与低分子肝素相比,UFH含有非常大的肝素分子,被认为具有出血作用。据称,低分子肝素的aXa活性较高,可以证明主要是由于缺乏Ca(2+),使用目前的实验室方法来估计这种活性。通过这一神器,低分子肝素明显的高aXa活性与其良好的药代动力学特性相关,但与之无关。因此,使用不同低分子肝素的剂量指南不能基于它们的aXa活性。在更好的实验室方法出现之前,临床结果是唯一可靠的肝素剂量指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信