Disseminated intravascular coagulation. clinical and pathophysiological mechanisms and manifestations.

Haemostasis Pub Date : 1999-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000022493
R L Bick, B Arun, E P Frenkel
{"title":"Disseminated intravascular coagulation. clinical and pathophysiological mechanisms and manifestations.","authors":"R L Bick,&nbsp;B Arun,&nbsp;E P Frenkel","doi":"10.1159/000022493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a complex disorder, with pathophysiology being variable and highly dependent upon the triggering event(s), host response(s) and comorbid conditions. As a result of these complicated interactions, the clinical expression and laboratory findings are varied, thereby affecting the specifics of diagnosis and therapeutic approaches. The highly complex and variable pathophysiology of DIC often results in a lack of uniformity in clinical manifestations, a lack of consensus in the specific appropriate laboratory criteria of diagnosis, and a lack of specific therapeutic modalities. Indeed, recommendations for therapy are often difficult because the morbidity and survival is more dependent on the specific cause of DIC and because the generally used specific therapeutic approaches, which include for example heparin, low-molecular-weight-heparin antithrombin concentrate and protein C concentrate, have never been subjected to objective prospective randomized trials, except antithrombin concentrates. An analysis of the complex and varied pathophysiological events in DIC provide objective guidelines and criteria for the clinical diagnosis, the laboratory diagnosis, and the definition of severity. These data compounded by an understanding of complex and varied pathophysiology can be used for objective evaluation of therapeutic responses and results. DIC is an intermediary mechanism of disease usually seen in association with well-defined clinical disorders. The pathophysiology of DIC serves as an intermediary mechanism in many disease processes, which sometimes remain organ specific. This catastrophic syndrome spans all areas of medicine and presents a broad clinical spectrum that is confusing to many. Most physicians consider DIC to be a systemic hemorrhagic syndrome; however, this is only because hemorrhage is evident and often impressive. Less commonly appreciated is the profound microvascular thrombosis and sometimes, large vessel thrombosis. The hemorrhage is often simple to contend with in patients with fulminant DIC, but it is the small- and large-vessel thrombosis, with impairment in blood flow, ischemia, and associated end-organ damage that usually leads to irreversible morbidity and mortality. In conclusion, the pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical, and laboratory manifestations of DIC are complex in part due to interrelationships within the hemostasis system. Only by clearly understanding these extraordinarily complex pathophysiological interrelationships can the clinician and laboratory scientist appreciate the divergent and wide spectrum of often confusing clinical and laboratory findings in patients with DIC. Many therapeutic decisions to be made are controversial and lack validation. Nevertheless, newer antithrombotic agents, and agents which can block, blunt or modify cytokine activity and the activity of vasoactive substances appear to be of value. The complexity and variable degree of clinical expression suggests that therapy should be individualized depending on the nature of DIC, age, etiology of DIC, site and severity of hemorrhage or thrombosis and hemodynamics and other appropriate clinical parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":12910,"journal":{"name":"Haemostasis","volume":"29 2-3","pages":"111-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000022493","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000022493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a complex disorder, with pathophysiology being variable and highly dependent upon the triggering event(s), host response(s) and comorbid conditions. As a result of these complicated interactions, the clinical expression and laboratory findings are varied, thereby affecting the specifics of diagnosis and therapeutic approaches. The highly complex and variable pathophysiology of DIC often results in a lack of uniformity in clinical manifestations, a lack of consensus in the specific appropriate laboratory criteria of diagnosis, and a lack of specific therapeutic modalities. Indeed, recommendations for therapy are often difficult because the morbidity and survival is more dependent on the specific cause of DIC and because the generally used specific therapeutic approaches, which include for example heparin, low-molecular-weight-heparin antithrombin concentrate and protein C concentrate, have never been subjected to objective prospective randomized trials, except antithrombin concentrates. An analysis of the complex and varied pathophysiological events in DIC provide objective guidelines and criteria for the clinical diagnosis, the laboratory diagnosis, and the definition of severity. These data compounded by an understanding of complex and varied pathophysiology can be used for objective evaluation of therapeutic responses and results. DIC is an intermediary mechanism of disease usually seen in association with well-defined clinical disorders. The pathophysiology of DIC serves as an intermediary mechanism in many disease processes, which sometimes remain organ specific. This catastrophic syndrome spans all areas of medicine and presents a broad clinical spectrum that is confusing to many. Most physicians consider DIC to be a systemic hemorrhagic syndrome; however, this is only because hemorrhage is evident and often impressive. Less commonly appreciated is the profound microvascular thrombosis and sometimes, large vessel thrombosis. The hemorrhage is often simple to contend with in patients with fulminant DIC, but it is the small- and large-vessel thrombosis, with impairment in blood flow, ischemia, and associated end-organ damage that usually leads to irreversible morbidity and mortality. In conclusion, the pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical, and laboratory manifestations of DIC are complex in part due to interrelationships within the hemostasis system. Only by clearly understanding these extraordinarily complex pathophysiological interrelationships can the clinician and laboratory scientist appreciate the divergent and wide spectrum of often confusing clinical and laboratory findings in patients with DIC. Many therapeutic decisions to be made are controversial and lack validation. Nevertheless, newer antithrombotic agents, and agents which can block, blunt or modify cytokine activity and the activity of vasoactive substances appear to be of value. The complexity and variable degree of clinical expression suggests that therapy should be individualized depending on the nature of DIC, age, etiology of DIC, site and severity of hemorrhage or thrombosis and hemodynamics and other appropriate clinical parameters.

弥散性血管内凝血。临床病理生理机制及表现。
弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)是一种复杂的疾病,其病理生理学是可变的,高度依赖于触发事件、宿主反应和合并症。由于这些复杂的相互作用,临床表现和实验室结果各不相同,从而影响了诊断和治疗方法的细节。DIC的病理生理高度复杂多变,常常导致临床表现缺乏一致性,在特定的适当的实验室诊断标准上缺乏共识,以及缺乏特定的治疗方式。事实上,推荐治疗通常是困难的,因为发病率和生存率更多地取决于DIC的特定原因,因为通常使用的特定治疗方法,包括肝素、低分子量肝素抗凝血酶浓缩物和蛋白C浓缩物,除了抗凝血酶浓缩物外,从未进行过客观的前瞻性随机试验。对DIC复杂多样的病理生理事件的分析为临床诊断、实验室诊断和严重程度的定义提供了客观的指导和标准。这些数据加上对复杂多样的病理生理学的理解,可用于客观评价治疗反应和结果。DIC是一种疾病的中间机制,通常与明确的临床疾病相关。DIC的病理生理在许多疾病过程中充当中介机制,有时仍然是器官特异性的。这种灾难性的综合征跨越了医学的所有领域,呈现出广泛的临床谱,使许多人感到困惑。大多数医生认为DIC是一种全身性出血性综合征;然而,这仅仅是因为出血明显且常常令人印象深刻。较不常见的是深度微血管血栓形成,有时是大血管血栓形成。暴发性DIC患者的出血通常很容易处理,但它是小血管和大血管血栓形成,血流障碍,缺血和相关的终末器官损伤,通常导致不可逆转的发病率和死亡率。总之,DIC的病理生理机制、临床和实验室表现是复杂的,部分原因是止血系统内部的相互关系。只有清楚地了解这些异常复杂的病理生理相互关系,临床医生和实验室科学家才能理解DIC患者的临床和实验室结果的分歧和广泛,这些结果往往令人困惑。许多治疗决定是有争议的,缺乏有效性。然而,新的抗血栓药物,以及能够阻断、减弱或改变细胞因子活性和血管活性物质活性的药物似乎是有价值的。临床表现的复杂性和多变性表明,应根据DIC的性质、年龄、DIC的病因、出血或血栓形成的部位和严重程度、血流动力学和其他适当的临床参数进行个体化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信