Assessment of the ability of the topical skin protectant (TSP) to protect against contact dermatitis to urushiol (Rhus) antigen.

D A Vidmar, M K Iwane
{"title":"Assessment of the ability of the topical skin protectant (TSP) to protect against contact dermatitis to urushiol (Rhus) antigen.","authors":"D A Vidmar,&nbsp;M K Iwane","doi":"10.1053/AJCD01000190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Military personnel have a need for effective protection against cutaneous exposure to chemical warfare agents (CWA). Topical Skin Protectant (TSP) is being developed to supplement chemical warfare protective garments. TSP protects against CWA exposure in animals, but does it work for humans? Because humans should not be tested with live CWA, urushiol (poison ivy) extract was used as a surrogate substance in place of CWA for human efficacy testing of TSP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine whether TSP protects human skin against experimentally-induced urushiol dermatitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Open urushiol patch testing of 50 rhus-sensitive subjects comparing the 96-hour dermatitis severity scores between TSP protected and TSP unprotected sites. There were 4 paired sites (i.e., protected versus unprotected) per subject. Test sites were scored using a 9-point dermatitis scale of 0.0 to 4.0 (using 0.5 increments).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of variance of the dermatitis scores from 192 paired sites on 48 evaluable subjects showed that TSP protected sites had mean dermatitis scores about 2 points lower than TSP unprotected sites (P <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although this study does not provide direct scientific evidence that TSP protects humans against the percutaneous absorption of CWA, it does provide circumstantial evidence that this is the case. The fact that TSP is so highly effective against a lipophilic substance like urushiol and that most common vesicant CWAs are lipophilic and are weaponized in oleaginous vehicles, makes the effectiveness of TSP in preventing absorption and dermatitis from CWA seem likely.</p>","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/AJCD01000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Military personnel have a need for effective protection against cutaneous exposure to chemical warfare agents (CWA). Topical Skin Protectant (TSP) is being developed to supplement chemical warfare protective garments. TSP protects against CWA exposure in animals, but does it work for humans? Because humans should not be tested with live CWA, urushiol (poison ivy) extract was used as a surrogate substance in place of CWA for human efficacy testing of TSP.

Objective: Determine whether TSP protects human skin against experimentally-induced urushiol dermatitis.

Methods: Open urushiol patch testing of 50 rhus-sensitive subjects comparing the 96-hour dermatitis severity scores between TSP protected and TSP unprotected sites. There were 4 paired sites (i.e., protected versus unprotected) per subject. Test sites were scored using a 9-point dermatitis scale of 0.0 to 4.0 (using 0.5 increments).

Results: Analysis of variance of the dermatitis scores from 192 paired sites on 48 evaluable subjects showed that TSP protected sites had mean dermatitis scores about 2 points lower than TSP unprotected sites (P <.001).

Conclusion: Although this study does not provide direct scientific evidence that TSP protects humans against the percutaneous absorption of CWA, it does provide circumstantial evidence that this is the case. The fact that TSP is so highly effective against a lipophilic substance like urushiol and that most common vesicant CWAs are lipophilic and are weaponized in oleaginous vehicles, makes the effectiveness of TSP in preventing absorption and dermatitis from CWA seem likely.

评价局部皮肤保护剂(TSP)对漆酚(Rhus)抗原对接触性皮炎的保护作用。
背景:军事人员需要有效保护皮肤免受化学战剂(CWA)的暴露。局部皮肤保护剂(TSP)正在开发中,以补充化学战防护服。TSP可以防止动物接触CWA,但它对人类有效吗?由于人类不应该用活的CWA进行测试,漆酚(毒藤)提取物被用作替代CWA的替代物质进行TSP的人体功效测试。目的:探讨皂苷对实验性漆酚性皮炎的保护作用。方法:采用开放式漆酚贴片试验,对50例rhus敏感受试者进行TSP保护部位和TSP未保护部位的96小时皮炎严重程度评分比较。每位受试者有4个配对位点(即受保护与未受保护)。测试部位使用9分皮炎量表评分,评分范围从0.0到4.0(使用0.5个增量)。结果:对48名可评估受试者的192个配对部位的皮炎评分的方差分析显示,TSP保护部位的平均皮炎评分比TSP未保护部位的平均皮炎评分低约2分(P)。结论:虽然本研究没有提供TSP保护人体免受CWA经皮吸收的直接科学证据,但它确实提供了间接证据。事实上,TSP对漆酚等亲脂性物质非常有效,而且大多数常见的发泡剂CWAs是亲脂性的,并且在产油载体中被武武化,这使得TSP在防止CWA吸收和皮炎方面的有效性似乎是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信