[Comparison of immunoassay kits for detection of staphylococcal enterotoxins produced by Staphylococcus aureus].

T M Pan, Y L Yu, S I Chiu, S S Lin
{"title":"[Comparison of immunoassay kits for detection of staphylococcal enterotoxins produced by Staphylococcus aureus].","authors":"T M Pan,&nbsp;Y L Yu,&nbsp;S I Chiu,&nbsp;S S Lin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Four commercial kits, SET-RPLA, RIDASCREEN, SET-EIA, and TECRA, were compared for the efficiency of detecting staphylococcal enterotoxins (SE). There was no non-specific reaction for detection of SE produced by 21 Staphylococcus aureus strains from 5 outbreaks of food poisoning using SET-RPLA, SET-EIA and TECRA kits. The background of the results of RIDASCREEN kit was high and non-specific reactions were present in some strains.</p><p><strong>In conclusion: </strong>(i) TECRA kit is suggested to be used for screening SE producing strains; (ii) SET-RPLA and RIDASCREEN kits are suitable for epidemiological investigation of SE types, but the lack of ability for detecting SEE, long time required for testing with SET-RPLA kit and high background when using RIDASCREEN kit must be overcome; and (iii) because of the complicated test procedures and the lack of ability for detecting SEE, the practicality of SET-EIA kit in screening and epidemiological research purposes is low.</p>","PeriodicalId":24009,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua Minguo wei sheng wu ji mian yi xue za zhi = Chinese journal of microbiology and immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua Minguo wei sheng wu ji mian yi xue za zhi = Chinese journal of microbiology and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: Four commercial kits, SET-RPLA, RIDASCREEN, SET-EIA, and TECRA, were compared for the efficiency of detecting staphylococcal enterotoxins (SE). There was no non-specific reaction for detection of SE produced by 21 Staphylococcus aureus strains from 5 outbreaks of food poisoning using SET-RPLA, SET-EIA and TECRA kits. The background of the results of RIDASCREEN kit was high and non-specific reactions were present in some strains.

In conclusion: (i) TECRA kit is suggested to be used for screening SE producing strains; (ii) SET-RPLA and RIDASCREEN kits are suitable for epidemiological investigation of SE types, but the lack of ability for detecting SEE, long time required for testing with SET-RPLA kit and high background when using RIDASCREEN kit must be overcome; and (iii) because of the complicated test procedures and the lack of ability for detecting SEE, the practicality of SET-EIA kit in screening and epidemiological research purposes is low.

[金黄色葡萄球菌产生的葡萄球菌肠毒素免疫测定试剂盒的比较]。
未标记:比较了四种商用试剂盒SET-RPLA、RIDASCREEN、SET-EIA和TECRA检测葡萄球菌肠毒素(SE)的效率。采用SET-RPLA、SET-EIA和TECRA试剂盒检测5起食物中毒事件中21株金黄色葡萄球菌产生的SE均无非特异性反应。RIDASCREEN试剂盒检测结果背景较高,部分菌株存在非特异性反应。综上所述:(1)推荐使用TECRA试剂盒筛选产SE菌株;(ii) SET-RPLA和RIDASCREEN试剂盒适用于SE类型的流行病学调查,但必须克服SET-RPLA试剂盒检测SEE能力不足、检测时间长、使用RIDASCREEN试剂盒本底高等问题;(三)由于检测程序复杂,缺乏检测SEE的能力,SET-EIA试剂盒在筛查和流行病学研究方面的实用性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信